I know I've told you this before, but I love the way you jump on a song once you start getting feedback. I mean, you usually post something that's got more than one or 2 rough edges, then you see what sticks to the wall, take out the shit that doesn't...remix. YESSSS!!!
I've still got a couple of things to piss you off and drive you nuts:
1. When you go into "ambience" modeat the end of the tune, I'd turn the flanger off quicker if you can still do that. I'm hearing a flange on your shirt, LOL.
Also, it's really only at the very very beginning that the timing is really noticeable to me...I mean, the bongos are cool, and then the bass and the gits just come in all weird at :10 seconds, and it stays screwed up until about :13 seconds in. Actually, it might toally fix it if you just brought the bass in a hair later. Splice that sucker and move it over to the right a bit.
Anyway, this sounds much more like a finished product, so I guess it almost is, eh?
I'm glad you decided to record this.
[edit] Good decision on killing that high part...I'm listening to ver. 1 and ver3 (or 4?) side by side. yes, i think Pete steered you in the right direction there.
You obviously retracked some of the backups somewhere along the line, b/c they're much better in the second chorus.
The reason I'm posting is to offer a suggestion about the backups. When you have 3 vocal parts going, you do what I do, which is split the 2 bg vox left and right somewhat. But it sounds like when you have one bg vocal, you're just centering it...which is okay, but if you wanna' give it even more separation, try making a copy of it, panning one left 30, one right 30, and offset the two parts by 25 or 30 milliseconds. You know, the old "fake stereo" guitar trick. It's adds a natural chorus to the bg vox, and I think they sound more like "background" vox when I do that.
These backups are totally cool, btw...I'm not saying you need to do that for this tune...just something to keep in mind; and I didn't mean to insult you if you already do this...LOL.
Later