I think it just a matter of the application you need this equipment for-
are you a pro, are you a musician, are you playing around in
a homestudio (to all homestudio owners - no offense ment - I do have one myself)
fact is that you cant beat their prices, on the other side the age of miracles has passed- you get what you pay for.
Me personal , I'm trying to avoid behringer whereever I can, on all my live tech riders beringer is strictly forbidden, and I'm not happy when I see it in the racks, but when I'm doing live sound I'd not cancel a show because of it.
The main problem I have with this kind of gear (not just B) is that you don't know hat happens to the audio, because it's surely NOT whats printed on the front panel. E.g. the mentioned composer: the threshold settings are most inaccurate in terms of dynamic response times - cheap peak tetection unit - compression ratio : ever tried to set an Urei or
a dbx 160 to 4:1 - you don't want do that to your singer unless you do a radio mix or you want to quit that job anyway. Me poor thing having to use behringer from time to time on small live shows I usually end up with 3,5:1 and I still get not the result of a dbx set to 2db - and I'm loosing all the brilliance and high end on the voice...
SO WHY SHOULD I USE IT?
apart from the fact that a box named 'COMPOSER' and 'AUTOCOM PRO' (!) really annoyes me...