G
Gunther
New member
So I went shopping for monitors on Friday.
I took a trip to Sam Ash and listened to a few monitors.
I did not like the M-Audio monitors… they were not bad for the price, but the $470 BX8s did not compare to the passive speakers in that price range. But a lot of their price is for the AMP, so these are no doubt a great buy.
The Tannoy reveals were a nice speaker, I can see why they get so much praise.
But I think of all the monitors I looked at in this range I preferred the Event 20/20s. They had a depth of sound and a clarity that the others in this price range did not. Since they were on sale and could be had for $299 I was really tempted.
Then I took the trip to the high-end audio store. Man, the B&Ws rock. They sound MUCH better than the monitors, that’s for sure… but we expected that from hi fi speakers, didn’t we? They were very neutral sounding, voices sounded like voices, trumpets sounded like trumpets… They were great, really exciting to listen to. Not much hype, just crystal clear sound.
But what was important to me was ‘can I hear those hidden little details?’ I suppose we can all learn the strengths and weaknesses of our monitors and keep them in mind with our mixes… but unheard detail will be unheard, and never fixed. The answer is a definite yes. Does it compete with the studio monitors on this level? Probably… Ill have to get used to my B&Ws then take a CD I know well to Sam Ash and make a second listen, but I am pretty sure the B&Ws will either match or out perform the $400 and under studio monitors in this aspect.
So I am no expert, but I don’t think the B&Ws are a bad choice as monitors on a budget. And for me, where my studio is also my listening room, for $400 these might be the ideal speakers.
I took a trip to Sam Ash and listened to a few monitors.
I did not like the M-Audio monitors… they were not bad for the price, but the $470 BX8s did not compare to the passive speakers in that price range. But a lot of their price is for the AMP, so these are no doubt a great buy.
The Tannoy reveals were a nice speaker, I can see why they get so much praise.
But I think of all the monitors I looked at in this range I preferred the Event 20/20s. They had a depth of sound and a clarity that the others in this price range did not. Since they were on sale and could be had for $299 I was really tempted.
Then I took the trip to the high-end audio store. Man, the B&Ws rock. They sound MUCH better than the monitors, that’s for sure… but we expected that from hi fi speakers, didn’t we? They were very neutral sounding, voices sounded like voices, trumpets sounded like trumpets… They were great, really exciting to listen to. Not much hype, just crystal clear sound.
But what was important to me was ‘can I hear those hidden little details?’ I suppose we can all learn the strengths and weaknesses of our monitors and keep them in mind with our mixes… but unheard detail will be unheard, and never fixed. The answer is a definite yes. Does it compete with the studio monitors on this level? Probably… Ill have to get used to my B&Ws then take a CD I know well to Sam Ash and make a second listen, but I am pretty sure the B&Ws will either match or out perform the $400 and under studio monitors in this aspect.
So I am no expert, but I don’t think the B&Ws are a bad choice as monitors on a budget. And for me, where my studio is also my listening room, for $400 these might be the ideal speakers.