There's another sort of odd way you can look at the issue of "bad manuals/tech support".
With the growing usage of USENET, private message boards, and kick ass search tools like DejaNews....I'm sure that more and more people are turning to the net as a reference and NOT calling the 1-800-STILL-HOLDING tech support line to complain about the manuals.
So here we are bitching about poor manuals on this message board that was started I'm sure in part as a result of poor manuals which are poor as a result of the free advise available from thousands of generous souls on the net like those found on this message board.
Heh, that's weird. (no it's not based on any facts or shit like that, my brain's just been switched from suck to blow)
Anyway, speaking as someone who has had to write a couple small software manuals (operating procedures actually...not so bad) .... it's not as easy as it looks man. In fact it's incredibly hard as there are SOOO many levels of computer knowledge from "what's right-click mean?" to "I can use the right acronyms in the proper order!"
In fact, you'd be amazed at the results you'd get if you were to take 10 random people off the street and have them press "ALT S", or even more difficult, "ALT + S" on the keyboard. From "hey nothing happened" to "where's the plus key?"...a mess all in all.
I don't think I've ever seen a great manual of any sort. In fact, I'd be happy if all manuals were reduced to schematics and diagrams and charts. As long as the how is THERE, I'll get they why from "so-and-so" on the "such-and-such" website.
I think on the whole you'd be suprised at how many psychology/communcations 'experts' are hired by technology companies to come up with the complete jibberish that is the Manual. Heh.
Slackmaster 2000