An amazing day with a legend: Bob Katz

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeeRosario
  • Start date Start date
LeeRosario

LeeRosario

New member
To my fellow threadsters! I hope it's alright to type this. I just want to share an experience with you all that I'm pretty excited about!

A Day with a Legend​

By: Lee Rosario
I've never been the type of person to become dazzled by any particular experience, but I suppose there comes a moment when I have to realize the importance of a situation.

In this case, a visit and a consultation with one of the top mastering engineers in the world, Mr. Bob Katz. Keep in mind that at 22, I'm considered a "boy" in the field.

It started the week of the 18th, December 2005. I had currently been working on a latin jazz project, of which some members had already established a personal relationship with Bob a long time before the conception of this project.

As fate would of have it, one of musicians had met up with Bob at a social function of some type and landed some time to listen to the album I was engineering. They explained a little bit of my history, how I am just a young kid who is really holding an amazingly complex album together very well. So they sat with Bob in at the Digital Domain mastering room and gave the album a listen. Keep in mind, I had no idea this ever happened.

The day after, I received a call from the producer of the project. I would later find out that he had met up with Bob and that Bob Katz was interested in meeting me. The man George Massenburg, inventor of the parameteric EQ, hails with tremendous respect in a digital era. Veteran engineers would kill for the opportunity. I almost didn't feel worthy.

That was the first shock. A professional, who's time is very valuable, requesting me. As if that wasn't breath taking enough, I later found out that he graded me a very generous B on the entire project. And comming from Bob, thats a huge deal and a tremendous honor.

So in the next few days, I set out to make the appointment with him to meet him at his request. And let me tell you, I was a wreck!

Speaking with him on the phone was nothing short of a great introduction to his genious. He calmly advised that I review his notes on prepping files.

December 28, 2005-

I was scheduled to come in at 12 in the afternoon. I made it at 11:30 with the sax player of the group. Digital Domain, Bob's private mastering facility, proved the rumors true. The room reflected a minimalist and audiophile's purist style.

With nothing more than a couch sitting in front of prestine Weiss eq's and compression units, along with Bob's personally designed Digital Domain's "K Box", you could already tell simplicty was extremely important.. In the back, I glimpshed a reel to reel machine of some type , Dorrough metering as well as some high end A/D converstion stuff. I felt it rude to stare at the computer screen. So I couldn't be too sure what he was working with. Sadie and Wavelab was all that I could read for the moment. All in all, it was a very simple set up. You could tell the room was optimized for the single purpose of prestine mastering.

The set up was something to be admired. You could almost compare it to a space ship's command deck. In the middle of the room layed a leather green "listening couch" with a flat screen in front of it. I call it the captains chair. Behind the couch is another desk equipped with another flat screen. This is where one of Bob's assistants will make session additons during a mastering session (entering serial numbers for songs, typing in an applicatable information for the album, etc). This can be done in conjunction with the mastering. So in essence, one person is editing while the other masters the song.

We took our shoes off, in Bob's eccentric manner and stepped into his "world". A simplistic white room with a steeply angled high ceiling was our environment. Absorption material was stratigically placed throughout the room. I managed to sit down next to Bob as he carefully listened to historic latin salsa material that I assume he was hired to preserve. "Those are real strings", he said. I nodded and replied with a comment on one of the brass arrangments that stood out in my head. I noticed he was sorta fighting his wireless keyboard, in which he then added, "I'm always having problems with this thing". It reminded me of all the times I had to fight with my shitty wireless keyboard.

In that moment, you could feel a vibe of deep of concentration. Having arrived half an hour early, it was a treat to simply be sitting next to a master and watching him "do his thing". He listened and lightly grooved with the music, and then afterwards perhaps made a minor adjustment here and there.

He has a very subtle nature to him. Very straight foward and well spoken. When you speak with Bob, you realize you are speaking to a true fanatic of music in its completeness. You realize he is not simply just a mastering engineer, but a protector of intellectual and musical communication. A very opiniated man that gives it to you straight and clear.

In the next 2 and a half hours (when originally I was scheduled for 1), we look at my material and I was proud to receive very uplifting comments. We worked on my weaknesses and how I can improve myself, not just technically, but spiritually. The ability to approach a mix with a global and individualistic mind. "Seeing the forest and the trees" as he puts it.

The material I presented him would be along the lines of a Herbie Hancock meets Paquito D' Rivera with a touch of something completely different. Bob was able to pick up on that and explain his views on how he would approach the mix and how I can get it sounding even better. "But that's just me, now I'm just knit picking" he explained. I replied very energectically, "But thats exactly what I want! Pick away!"

His explinations are what you might expect, insightful and holistic. "Too much of that and it turns to shit, too little of that and it turns to shit. So always just trust your judgement", striving to make his point subtle and crystal clear.

We talked about eq technique, reverb calibration, the importance of predelays in finding "that spot" for an instrument and so much more. Context was a big part of our talk. "Logically, no one instrument should be as loud as your mix, so remember that for your intros", he said.

How to treat digitally recorded instruments and putting life back into them. That was a great experience for me. The differences between treating a mix in a digital vs natural sense. And probably most importantly, the dangers of comb filtering. Proper tracking will always set up a good mix.

"Of course, I might just be full of shit...just remember to ride with the mix and listen to whats going on", he adds. If that came from any other engineer, it probably would never set in.

On the technical front, Bob is just as quick. The man is not the father of the analog to digital front for nothing. He was quick to explain the short commings of programs like Pro Tools LE and M-Powered stuff and how the conception of cheap and afordable gear can fool many. Although he was not completely denouncing them, either. When I asked what he thought of the Motu stuff, he replied, "The Digital Performer stuff is for masocists, too many limitations". Not that I was particularly interested in Motu stuff, but it had been itching me for a long time, so what better way than to ask a professional. He did, however, mention Nuendo and Logic. "Nuendo is good, but expensive. Logic seems to be a very good program these days, just very weird", he explained. I having had some background in Logic, could understand him perfectly. Logic, at least I beleive, is powerful in the MIDI front and extremely flexible. Not exactly to the level that I care for.

At the end of our consultation, I did manage to spring up one last question as I put my shoes back on. "So what are your thoughts on the 192khz revolution with all thats comming out, like the Focusrite Sapphire?", I asked. Now something you have to understand about the guy is that he is a man of his beliefs. His reply was simple and very heartfelt, as if he already knew I was going to ask. "It's all bullshit, that's entirely too much for tracking and even mixing. Anything more than 96khz is probably unnessessary. And that might even be too much. Save the high samplerate stuff for the mastering engineer", he casually put it. You could say I'm a bit sold on the answer.

I think an important and admirable characteristic to Bob is his humble persona. As busy as he is, he was able to go out of his way to sit with me and guide "a young talent" as he put it. Yet, he stresses that the world is a big place, and to not take his teachings as a rule of thumb. He reminds me of what it is to be excited to work in a field such as this one and that proper timing and hard work do pay off in the long run. "So if it takes you 6 hours to mix a section, then let it take 6 hours. Next time it may take 3 and so on...".

Although 2 and a half hours felt like 5 minutes, the memory is forever. The experience will mark a very important part in my development. It feels comforting to know that skillful and kind people, like Bob, are still out there making music happen for the world to enjoy. I look forward to the future! @
 
Last edited:
Obviously those guys heard something in your music that they liked a lot. There's no way they would have spent that time with you if they didn't think you were worth it. You showed them potential, but also the need for guidance, and they generously shared what they consider important.

I'd suggest you write down in as great detail as possible what Bob said to you that day. Time can have a way of blurring things, and written notes will be something you can go back to for years and years to refresh the memory.
 
Oh yes, exactly!

I brought my notebook, and jotted down key notes. I've always been a better listener, so my notes are always one word or like a simple phrase.


But I very much agree with your advice!
 
That was a great post - I enjoyed reading it. Thanks for sharing it with us! Peace, Rez
 
This is great. Congrats. Care to share any of those reverb remarks?


Had to ask.
 
Thanks for taking the time to share your experience. And congratulations! Good luck with your career.
 
Middleman said:
This is great. Congrats. Care to share any of those reverb remarks?


Had to ask.


Well the emphasis was on predelays and how they relate to a clear mix.

For example, the nature of reverberation is simply viewed as a traveling entity from a direct source. By us hearing the reverb attached to a certain source, we are able to determine it's space in relation to our ears.

Predelay is what travels with the sound source before bouncing off an object or objects. Once it bounces, it is known as reverberation.

You'd adjust predelay to match and recreate the room in which the source was recorded in.

Adjusting predelay correctly gives a source a stronger place in the mix, which in turn makes it easier to identify its spatial relationship.

Cool, huh?
 
Ooh... cool. If I only knew enough about rooms and reverbs to actually do that!
 
LeeRosario said:
Well the emphasis was on predelays and how they relate to a clear mix.

For example, the nature of reverberation is simply viewed as a traveling entity from a direct source. By us hearing the reverb attached to a certain source, we are able to determine it's space in relation to our ears.

Predelay is what travels with the sound source before bouncing off an object or objects. Once it bounces, it is known as reverberation.

You'd adjust predelay to match and recreate the room in which the source was recorded in.

Adjusting predelay correctly gives a source a stronger place in the mix, which in turn makes it easier to identify its spatial relationship.

Cool, huh?

It seems the term "predelay" can be confusing at times. Basically, it's pre-reflection, right?
 
Use of reverbs, and predelays as well as pitch shifting really is the high art of mixing. Pan and volume are usually easy to figure out and emulate. EQ is more difficult as is compression but overtime these concepts kind of develop in anyone who does this on a regular basis.

Reverb and delay are a little more tricky as you start to paint the environment in which the music sits. In the old days, they just fired up the plate and set it on the vocal, occasionally on anything that needed to be set back in the mix. I hear older stuff just steeped in reverb across the whole mix.

Today, its become a high art with multiple instances of verb and pitch shifting one side up and one side down. Chuck Ainlay, the notorious Nashville engineer actually documented his process 6 years ago http://emusician.com/mag/emusic_day_life_mix/index.html .

I actually charted this article in excel to understand how everything was routed. Mind you most of your average rock n roll or hip hop albums are not this extensive but it interesting to know what's going on here.

Thanks for response Lee. You reminded me to get back to learning this stuff so I can build up my reverb chops.

MM
 
tkingen said:
It seems the term "predelay" can be confusing at times. Basically, it's pre-reflection, right?

pre-delay can be incorrectly read as meaning something that comes before the delay, but it actually means the delay that comes before the reverb. I guess it could be called pre-reverb, but that makes me think of the reverse verb trick.
 
i think the terms "pre delay" and "early reflections" may get turned around a little sometimes.
 
Nice reads, and experience for ya!!

Now could you divuldge in the "Latin Jazz" project that you worked on?

T
 
This is incredible.

Being a user of Pro Tools LE I'm very interested to know what he thought were the shortcomings this "cheap and affordable gear". Any elaborationon this would be appreciated!
 
Middleman said:
Today, its become a high art with multiple instances of verb and pitch shifting one side up and one side down. Chuck Ainlay, the notorious Nashville engineer actually documented his process 6 years ago http://emusician.com/mag/emusic_day_life_mix/index.html .

MM

Middleman,

Thanks for providing this link to the Chuck Ainlay article. I've been reading Behind The Glass by Howard Massey and Mixing With Your Mind by Michael Stavrou. The Chuck article falls in line with some concepts I've been pondering while studying these books.
It's been interesting to find out how much tweaking actually goes on with an 'A-Team' production. It's a sure bet that Toby Keith had a top notch recording team - but Chuck Ainlay still found the need to tweak their hard work to get the song to gell. I'm really amazed at how much eq boosting is done by the mixing masters. Conventional advice usually tells us to cut eq rather than boost, less is more with reverb, etc. When you read stories like the session with Chuck it's almost like no one ever told him about the rules! He relies on personal vision, intuition and experience - never mind about the rules. That in itself is a mindblowing lesson for me. :)
 
wunderbarmusic said:
This is incredible.

Being a user of Pro Tools LE I'm very interested to know what he thought were the shortcomings this "cheap and affordable gear". Any elaborationon this would be appreciated!


Well he described each version of Pro Tools like a stairway. He had good things to say about HD, but suggested that Pro Tools LE and M-Powered are simply lacking features to get people excited enough to buy HD. So M-powered would be at the bottom of the chain, followed by LE and then HD. So it's mostly a money thing, but he didnt go into details.

And it's true, having worked with HD/ TDM,I could instantly tell it's better suited for world class stuff.


On the subject of mixing technique,

I think the most important thing (aside from continuos studies), is a sense of context. That's where the best engineers make thier bread. The ability to find unison in any mix. So naturally you tend to know how to place instruments just right, EQ them perfectly, find a perfect blend of FX, etc.


A lot of people debate whether it can be taught or not. I personally think it can't be taught, just like someone who just has a gift for any art.

However, I believe there are two types of people: The person who has a natural ability to do something and someone who learns technique over time. Both equally effective.
 
I'd like to join the ranks thanking you for sharing that experience; it was very generous of you and Katz.

I'm so glad to hear you take the basic and "holistic" stuff of his to heart. There is one passage that really strike a chord related to these forums, I think:
LeeRosario said:
"Of course, I might just be full of shit...just remember to ride with the mix and listen to whats going on", he adds. If that came from any other engineer, it probably would never set in.
There are two real nuggets here. The first is his "just remember" comment, which is as true as it gets. The second is your following comment about it coming from "any other engineer".

The bittersweet fact behind the combination of these nuggets is that apparently one does not know what they are talking about unless they have a big name; experience itself is meaningless. There are folks who are regulars on this board like Bruce, Tom, John, Al and Jason* who have great knowledge and experience who say here on a dialy basis the very thing(s) Katz said to Lee.

The difference is when these guys say something like "ride with the mix and listen to what's going on", they get flamed left and right by newbs who think they are just blowing smoke or keeping secrets or just don't know what they're talking about. If the amount of experience any of these folks has is brough up, then the response often (not always) that these guys are too old and just not hip enough to get respect for their opinions. Not because of what they say - that's rarely even taken into consideration - but rather because they were not lucky enough by virtue of circumstance to have cut their teeth on Sunset Boulivard or Beale Street and gotten some gold record names under their belts; therefore they must not know what they're talking about anymore than the newbs here do. But when someone like Katz comes along and says the exact same thing, it suddenly sounds like a Revalation passed down from the Mount.

I'd also like to note that nowhere in Lee's posts re The Katz Encounter were any kind of specific recipies mentioned. Lee, I assume that's because they never came up and not that you're leaving them out? I think that's important to note, and also it's important to note that nobody, including Lee, is complaining about any lack of such mythical "recipies" to come out of a 2.5 hour brain picking with a celebrity name. :)

This rant is not addressed to you, Lee, or to anybody specifically. Just an open letter to the forum, I guess. :)

G.

* Don't get pissed or otherwise hurt if I didn't include your name; there are others here whose opinions I respect as well. I just couldn't feasibly list all of them...my posts are long enough! :D )
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
I'd like to join the ranks thanking you for sharing that experience; it was very generous of you and Katz.

I'm so glad to hear you take the basic and "holistic" stuff of his to heart. There is one passage that really strike a chord related to these forums, I think:
There are two real nuggets here. The first is his "just remember" comment, which is as true as it gets. The second is your following comment about it coming from "any other engineer".

The bittersweet fact behind the combination of these nuggets is that apparently one does not know what they are talking about unless they have a big name; experience itself is meaningless. There are folks who are regulars on this board like Bruce, Tom, John, Al and Jason* who have great knowledge and experience who say here on a dialy basis the very thing(s) Katz said to you.

The difference is when these guys say something like "ride with the mix and listen to what's going on", they get flamed left and right by newbs who think they are just blowing smoke or keeping secrets or just don't know what they're talking about. If the amount of experience any of these folks has is brough up, then the response often (not always) that these guys are too old and just not hip enough to get respect for their opinions. Not because of what they say - that's rarely even taken into consideration - but rather because they were not lucky enough by virtue of circumstance to have cut their teeth on Sunset Boulivard or Beale Street and gotten some gold record names under their belts; therefore they must not know what they're talking about anymore than the newbs here do. But when someone like Katz comes along and says the exact same thing, it suddenly sounds like a Revalation passed down from the Mount.

I'd also like to note that nowhere in Lee's posts re The Katz Encounter were any kind of specific recipies mentioned. Lee, I assume that's because they never came up and not that you're leaving them out? I think that's important to note, and also it's important to note that nobody, including Lee, is complaining about any lack of such mythical "recipies" to come out of a 2.5 hour brain picking with a celebrity name. :)

G.

* Don't get pissed or otherwise hurt if I didn't include your name; there are others here whose opinions I respect as well. I just couldn't feasibly list all of them...my posts are long enough! :D )

:D Tooshay!


Of course I didn't mean any disrespect to the fellows here at Home Recording by saying that. But it's true, big names do shock people into listening. At first.

But you take it with a grain of salt, and you develope this weird shell after a while. Like this "well, they are human just like me" shell. Of course, the responsilbilities you have are what give you that power.

I've always just liked to listen to people, but with a mental filter. Like if I like what someone says and it works, then obviously I do it. But if something dosn't sound right to me, I simply won't do it until someone proves me wrong or I see for myself.

The recipies where further elaborations of concepts I already knew, he just simply "opened my mind" to them. So I couldn't really say in detail, word for word. It's just like riding a bike, I just do it. I can't really tell someone how to properly mount a bike, how to push the pedals, move foward and expect success from my jumbled explinations.

But just so I don't leave anyone empty handed, doubling FX on digital instruments is a starting point to restoring or creating good imaging *hint hint*


You do know the guy has a great book out. I highly suggest buying it. "Mastering Audio: The Art and Science". Very good book.

I truly appreciate the comments from all! :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top