
SouthSIDE Glen
independentrecording.net
Oh, absolutely. I didn't mean to minimalize the procedure or to say it wasn't a valid option to add to the deal. I just wanted to specify for those listening in that it wasn't as simple as just recording a solo hum and inverting it; that there were a few more steps involved than that, that's all.mrface2112 said:FWIW, i've done this with some marginal success in the past. it's ugly, but you *can* make it work.....

Another potential complication to the procedure, and one that possibly may have caused the only "marginal" success at times is that the procedure assumes there are no variances whatsoever in the frequency of the hum; i.e. that it's a solid 50 or 60Hz hum with no modulations in the carrier frequency whatsoever. In real world situtions this is often not the case. The guitar track may have a 59.9Hz hum in it with a regular 0.5 Hz/sec modulation in it, and when the solo hum was recorded later the hum may be at 60.1 Hz with a random .3Hz fluctuation to it. Those numbers may not seem like much, but their plenty to keep the two hums from cleanly canceling each other out over any reasonable period of time.
While I have the conch shell here, though, I'd like to advance another technique that I have used often with good success:
Gate the guitar tracks just above the noise level of the hum and then go back and add a small reverb tail at the end of the fade just before the point where the gate kicks in.
HTH,
G.