A nice sonding cheaper Mic pre

  • Thread starter Thread starter johndavid
  • Start date Start date
I don't have any high end pres, but here are my thoughts on the low/mid end (is there such thing as a mid-end?) ones that I have:

Presonus Tube Pre -- as these things go, pretty good sounding, as long as you don't crank the "toob" part. *Not* something that you can take a soldering iron to, because it uses surface mount ICs. You can change the tube, but that's sort of a waste of time, since it's a starved plate design. I think I was able to reduce hiss some by changing the tube, which allowed for more clean gain. After getting the other pres, I started using it for bass guitar DI, but stopped that recently, too.

Presonus Inspire 1394 -- this in an interface, of course, but it contains two pres that are very different from the Tube Pre. Much lower gain. Actually not bad if you have a high output condenser microphone, but not too useful for dynamics, because they get noisy when you turn them up.

ART Tube MP (project or something - an older one - got it for $20 used) -- mine sounded like complete ass and changing the tube made no improvement. Unlike the Tube Pre, this one *is* capable of being worked on, although not easily because of the way the components are mounted on the board -- hopefully this got better with later units. Recently, I managed to install sockets for the opamps, replacing them with Burr Browns, and replaced a lot of capacitors. It actually sounds OK now (better than the Tube Pre, I think), and if I had done this mod earlier, I might have used this for something.

MOTU Traveler (out of price range, I think) -- this interface has 4 pres in it. Lots of gain and not too much noise, but sound was a little edgy/phasey or something and not something I wanted to use much (but I did, because they were the best I had). Also, the first pre flaked out and got *really* noisy and completely unusable. I got a replacement unit, and the first pre in that one flaked out too -- I wondered if it was a bad mic on my part, dunno. Anyway, I sent the traveler to Black Lion Audio, and it came back with all 4 pres working beautifully and sounding very clean and quiet, with all the gain, if not more. I happily use it all the time now, mostly for instruments.

M-Audio DMP3 - I got this after the MOTU, but before the BLA mod. If I had got it earlier, I probably would have used it more. Nice clean sound - not as much gain as the MOTU (before or after the mod), but better sound than the MOTU prior to the mod. But now, I think the modded MOTU pres are much better than the DMP3 so I don't use it too much.

ART Digital MPA (out of price range, I think) -- Very different animal from the Toob MP -- uses a combination of opamps (Burr Brown stock) and actual (300 volt) tube gain. Also has a variable input impedance control. I use this a lot for vocals and things I want to be smooth sounding. Great for bass DI for mellow tracks. I got it before the BLA mod, but I continue to use it along with the modded MOTU, because it's different and good. I think the ART MPA Gold is essentially the same unit, but doesn't have A/D conversion.

Ashly SC-40 instrument preamp -- not a mic preamp, but I'm including it for completeness here, since it's my go-to unit for energetic bass D.I. (I swapped the opamps for Burr Browns)

Digi 001 -- just got this and my son and I installed it on his computer -- no comments yet. This is another interface with two built in pres.


I'm *not* going to say something like: don't bother buying a cheap one, but instead save up and get a nice one, even though that's a great plan. I don't regret buying the cheap ones I don't use any more, and I still enjoy listening to the recordings I made with them (although I occasionally do "remakes" with the nicer equipment). If I had spend a bunch of $ on a unit I didn't like, I think I *would* regret that, though :)
 
Okay--so the Joe Meek is one I've always wondered about. And short of getting to check one out in my own studio, perhaps the best review is one that compares it to something I already know.

So since we both have and like SX202's--what's the Joe Meek like relative to the 202?

(Geez that sounded pushy...sorry!)


It's sort of like advertised. While the 202 is very clean and even sounding, the VC6Q can run the gamut. It's still a very clean preamp, but you can get a really fat and thick sound by adjusting the compression and EQ a bit. I was very surprised after trying various tube mic/pre combinations looking for a thick sound for a country singer. I plugged into the VC6Q and had it almost immediately. A few adjustments and it was perfect. You can't do any adjustments to the sx202. For acoustic instruments, the 202 is just right because you get what you hear. For vocals, the Joe Meek is the ticket to get something very flattering.
 
It's sort of like advertised. While the 202 is very clean and even sounding, the VC6Q can run the gamut. It's still a very clean preamp, but you can get a really fat and thick sound by adjusting the compression and EQ a bit. I was very surprised after trying various tube mic/pre combinations looking for a thick sound for a country singer. I plugged into the VC6Q and had it almost immediately. A few adjustments and it was perfect. You can't do any adjustments to the sx202. For acoustic instruments, the 202 is just right because you get what you hear. For vocals, the Joe Meek is the ticket to get something very flattering.

Great comparison--and that's exactly how I feel about the 202--it's my favorite for my acousitc guitar. And yet, you're right about not being able to do anything additional w/a voice on it--very interesting.

Something else for me to consider. Thanks!
 
To the 'Joe Meek' guys....


I've never heard any Joe Meek pre, so I'm wondering.... why do some people say they sound "gritty, or aggressive, or edgy".

Is there any truth to any of that ?

Do they tend to be a little, aggressive ?
 
Last edited:
Gritty? No.

Aggressive? Yes. Very "out front" sound. Vocals get through a mix easy.

Edgy? Maybe the real low end stuff like the 3Q or the newer Chinese stuff, but not the mid to higher end gear.
 
+1 for the Behringer

I've had good luck with the Behringer MIC200 Tube Ultragain, especially for the price. It does a good job with the lower end of the guitar spectrum and isn't bad for vocals, although obviously it could be better.
 
I just tested out my new Grace Design m101..and it sounds great..even made my sm57 shine!!
just a thought!!:)
 
another vote for the DMP3. its nice and clean and doesn't get in the way.
 
Didn't read all the way down page one, but enough to see your response to the "Joemeek guys", obviously I'm assuming someone recommended one. Joemeek "TrakPak" was the first condensor (JM47 earlier model) and an MQ3 recording channel (amp pre, "meequalizer", and signature Joemeek compression). I still have it, still use it, and it was an excellent first buy. You can get a VC3 (which I own one of the early gold silk-screened lettering versions), maybe a VC3Q or MQ3 for around $100 used on ebay. They have a signature sound, sure, but if you are looking in this price range, that signature sound will likely help your recordings, not give you unwanted color that detracts from your U47 tone.

btw, I'm not a professional studio, but have a pretty modestly decent setup including the room itself, and I still use my joemeek products in many of my applications.
 
Not that that price isn't every bit worth it, but shop around a little to get the best one you can if decide to go the joemeek route. My silkscreened early VC3 I did buy on a wanted ad from this site and had a great transaction, though, fwiw.
 

Similar threads

rob aylestone
Replies
13
Views
3K
neaxudos
neaxudos
rob aylestone
Replies
17
Views
1K
Scott Baxendale
Scott Baxendale
CrowsofFritz
Replies
7
Views
1K
TalismanRich
TalismanRich
Back
Top