A Fail-Safe Method for Mixing

  • Thread starter Thread starter markb287
  • Start date Start date
Obviously, since different mixers will have different approaches to mixing, there are no right or wrong answers here. I'm just very curious as to what you guys think.
It's important to keep this in mind before another thread breaks into internicine warfare......
 
Mix at low volume
I've recently learned that lesson. Not only is it much easier to hear what's going on when your mixes aren't peaking all the time, but it makes it easier to master in the end.
If I had to have a method, which I don't yet, I'd have this one:
1.Tweak the drums and lower their volume so they're not peaking
2.Mix other "rhythm" tracks with the drums
3.Add more melodic tracks with the exception of vocals
4. Mix vocals to these tracks
5.EQ tracks as needed
6.Add compression and effects as needed
7. Adjust volume to compressed/effected tracks

There's probably some issues with that methodology, and it's based on doing popular music, but it's what I'd do right now with a few years of experience.
 
Last edited:
I've recently learned that lesson. Not only is it much easier to hear what's going on when your mixes aren't peaking all the time, but it makes it easier to master in the end.
If I had to have a method, which I don't yet, I'd have this one:
1.Tweak the drums and lower their volume so they're not peaking
2.Mix other "rhythm" tracks with the drums
3.Add more melodic tracks with the exception of vocals
4. Mix vocals to these tracks
5.EQ tracks as needed
6.Add compression and effects as needed
7. Adjust volume to compressed/effected tracks

There's probably some issues with that methodology, and it's based on doing popular music, but it's what I'd do right now with a few years of experience.

Are you sure you're not confusing volume with signal/level? You can mix at low volume and still have everything peaking and clipping all over the joint... the two aren't related.

I'm a "mix as you go" person. I try to build up a song track by track (usually, until I try some other approach), rather than track a bunch of stuff and see if I can squeeze it in.... but I'm a solo recordist who plays everything and then adds my, or someone else's vocals at the end... so that's probably not the way someone running a real studio would do it.
 
Hey guys!

I'm new here and just wanted to get your opinions on a question.

If you had to stick to one basic method or procedure for mixing for the rest of your life, what would that method or procedure be?

Obviously, since different mixers will have different approaches to mixing, there are no right or wrong answers here. I'm just very curious as to what you guys think.

GIVE US FREE!!!! I record alotta dff shit, cant just be one way for me to track or mix really!

Ugghh!!!?? Frankly Im confused by the question are we talkin bout mixers? or Mixing procedure? and what procedure? Gain staging/Balancing/panning/Eqing?
 
OK. How about if I word the question like this:

If you had four weeks to train me (a complete beginner) for a mixing competition and you had a million dollars on the line, what would the training look like? What key lessons or principles would you want me to take away from the training?

I'd spend the 4 weeks training you how to dial in sounds and mic them properly. Everything after that is simple.
 
OK. How about if I word the question like this:

If you had four weeks to train me (a complete beginner) for a mixing competition and you had a million dollars on the line, what would the training look like? What key lessons or principles would you want me to take away from the training?

Easy, one key lesson be an Engine"EAR" not an Engine"Eye".
 
I'm not asking whether it's possible to become a pro in 4 weeks. I'm asking what would such a hypothetical training look like. Nor have I said anything about shortcuts. It would probably help you in the future if you read the question right.

I mean RAMI is deaf and he literally just fiddles wit knobs and just makes MAGIC!!! Its hard to explain any particular lesson's or key points for that. I mean i guess buy Bose Noise canceling headphones and try it out I guess.
 
I'm not asking whether it's possible to become a pro in 4 weeks. I'm asking what would such a hypothetical training look like. Nor have I said anything about shortcuts. It would probably help you in the future if you read the question right.

I read the question, I thought you said there are no wrong answers?....
 
I read the question, I thought you said there are no wrong answers?....

There are right answers to the wrong question.

So I did some math. I've probably spent 1000-1200 hours in the last 12 years working on all stages of recording combined (tracking, mixing, mastering). They say true mastery of a skill takes 10,000 hours. This means that if you come ask me for one piece of advice on mixing when I'm 135, I'm sure to have a great answer for you! Until then... grain of salt, I guess.

Also, why is everyone dropping the ball on quoting Rush here? Do BSG and I have to carry that entire thread?
 
A planet of playthings, we dance on the strings of powers we cannot perceive......

Are you sure you're not confusing volume with signal/level? You can mix at low volume and still have everything peaking and clipping all over the joint... the two aren't related.
The two aren't necessarilly related. I mix at low volume because I'm not a good mixer and I can't get as good a sense of balance if the volume is up. It feels like I'm in a whirlwind of sound. But low volume enables me to judge the balance of everything together somewhat better.

They say true mastery of a skill takes 10,000 hours.
I've never bought that. It takes what it takes, especially with all this machinery making modern music....:D
Also, why is everyone dropping the ball on quoting Rush here? Do BSG and I have to carry that entire thread?
Well, you may choose a ready guide in some celestial voice........
 
I fiddle with knobs and faders until it sounds good.

While I know this was a joke, in all seriousness, a lot of people will say this. I'd have to disagree to use this method to some degree. At least in my experience, lets say you called up a bunch of plugins on various tracks in your session, and just tweaked them until they sounded good but you didn't really know exactly what you were doing, or what those settings are really doing, other than just "it sounds good". So let's say somewhere down the line in your mix you notice something you're all of the sudden disliking. Maybe it was an eq move you made on the bass and now it isn't sitting right with the guitars. Maybe it was a compression move you made on a snare and had too fast of an attack so it sounds choked. So if you don't know what each tweak and turn was doing for each plugin you called up, when a problem arises like that further down the line, you're not going to know what to re-call and re-adjust in order to rid yourself of this problem you are hearing. You'll be overwhelmed and have learned nothing. Rather than spending your novice time learning what the stuff is doing and why.

See where I'm going? I'm I'm addressing you, Rami, for the record. Just a remark.
 
While I know this was a joke
If you knew it was a joke, why did you address it? :D

The
in all seriousness
....was your decision.

But, in all seriousness :D, when I say I just fiddle with knobs and faders until it sounds good, it's semi-serious, but it's not that far off. It doesn't mean I do it aimlessly. I do things in a certain order, for example, first bringing up faders and getting a ballpark level, etc.....

I don't just throw plugs on anything unless I think it will help achieve the final product I have in my head. I don't EQ, compress, pan, or add reverb to anything unless I think it needs it.

So, in essence, fiddling with knobs and faders until is sounds good is what we all do. But it doesn't mean you have to do anything without a purpose. :cool:
 
Last edited:
If you knew it was a joke, why did you address it? :D

The ....was your decision.

But, in all seriousness :D, when I say I just fiddle with knobs and faders until it sounds good, it's semi-serious, but it's not that far off. It doesn't mean I do it aimlessly. I do things in a certain order, for example, first bringing up faders and getting a ballpark level, etc.....

I don't just throw plugs on anything unless I think it will help achieve the final product I have in my head. I don't EQ, compress, pan, or add reverb to anything unless I think it needs it.

So, in essence, fiddling with knobs and faders until is sounds good is what we all do. But it doesn't mean you have to do anything without a purpose. :cool:

I addressed it, because a lot of people actually DO just mess around not knowing what they are doing and think they are mixing. So at the end I mentioned I wasn't targeting you.

But I guess you're right, at the end of the day that is really all we do (whther we know what we're doing or not). If you sat a deaf guy in the room and he watched you work, that's all he'd think anyways. :o
 
Its called the RAMI mix technique, "I just try to fiddle with mines a little faster"...ummm did that sound weird?
 
Well, that's what threw me off. You had a typo there and it reads

:cool:

I mean ya! Woops, no I meant to do that! I like causing confusion around these parts. Keeps you guys in tip top condition! :)
 
To be honest, I'm something of a "twiddle the knobs until it sounds good" merchant. Things like frequencies and amplitude scupper me. When I see some of the guys talking about 'cutting 4Db at 250 Hz' or 'the meat of the voice is in the such and such KHz region' or whatever, I'm torn between the light {admiration} and dark {ignorance¬> I haven't got a clue !}. Setting a compressor or expander knowledgeably is as simple for me as charting a course to Pluto, with a whistle stop to Saturn's rings, on a rocket.
However, my twiddling isn't aimless or random either. If I'm looking for a sound I'll try various EQ or effect settings to see if I can get an approximation. I've come to know that, for instance, boosting the various mid settings on my DAW can do wonders for the drums and percussion, but can be the kiss of death in distortion on the vocals or flappiness on the acoustic guitar. So I have to rely on how things sound. Of course, familiarity has bred a little more deliberation on my part.
 
I though you were supposed to fiddle with the knobs until it sounds bad, then go back to the last version of the mix and call it done :-)
 
Back
Top