J
jrosenstein
New member
I'm in the market for a new hard drive, and i'm wondering whether it would be worth it to shell out the extra money for a drive with an 8MB buffer instead of 2MB. I currently have a 7200rpm Maxtor, I've had it for a year or so, and maybe I got a dud, but this thing squeals like hell, i NEED it quieter. Right now it's the loudest part of my system.
My machine isn't running RAID or anything, just ATA100. (AMD XP1700+, ASUS A7V333 board, 512mb of 2100 DDR.) I've read a bunch of reviews, and I'd like to keep this at about 80GB, and within shouting distance of $100.
Places like storagereview.com seem to benchmark the Seagate Barracudas significantly lower than, say, an IBM Deskstar 180GXP, which also has fluid bearings. This is the PC I use for work, too, so I can't slow it down. Would I be foolish to buy a Seagate solely on account of its low noise? Or should I shell out a little extra cash step up to a larger cache? (cash ... cache ... that was actually an accident)
thanks,
jacob
My machine isn't running RAID or anything, just ATA100. (AMD XP1700+, ASUS A7V333 board, 512mb of 2100 DDR.) I've read a bunch of reviews, and I'd like to keep this at about 80GB, and within shouting distance of $100.
Places like storagereview.com seem to benchmark the Seagate Barracudas significantly lower than, say, an IBM Deskstar 180GXP, which also has fluid bearings. This is the PC I use for work, too, so I can't slow it down. Would I be foolish to buy a Seagate solely on account of its low noise? Or should I shell out a little extra cash step up to a larger cache? (cash ... cache ... that was actually an accident)
thanks,
jacob