IMO, yes! OMMV.................distortedrumble said:blue bear...are you serious? you mean i've been recording at 96 when i could do this at 48 with the same results?
Blue Bear Sound said:I generally track at 24/48 and mixdown (analog) to 24/88............
Bulls Hit said:Why 48, ie why not track at 88?
Also if you've tracked at 48 what's the benefit of mixdown at 88?
I track to an HD24, which doesn't do 88Khz -- and even if it did, I'm not convinced the additional storage is worth it. 24-bit/48KHz sounds pretty damn good to my ears -- and I'm picky!Bulls Hit said:Why 48, ie why not track at 88?
Also if you've tracked at 48 what's the benefit of mixdown at 88?