12 LD-Condenser-mics testet, here are the results!

Eurythmic said:
It... might be worth mentioning that this page isn't in English. :)
Click to expand...
puh, my english...
you see inthe list with the miks, the points & the files from each mic, i start with the winner :)
the first 3 mic's are great, the next 3 are ok & the last 6 are cheap or bad...
the best mic for not to much money is the rode nt1000...
 
Eurythmic said:
It... might be worth mentioning that this page isn't in English. :)
Click to expand...

german is a wonderful language, worth learning it!
((-;



MOnty,
if you like, I could try to translate the page
Harald
 
that just shows that I cant trust my ears. I liked it second best of all the mics and it came in last.

I know that warlock liked it best, and another guy on musicplayer liked it second best.

Anyhow.

hey monty,

I did not see the mk416 on the sound room page. I only saw the mk516. Do they sell the mk416 under a different name in the u.s?
 
h kuhn said:


german is a wonderful language, worth learning it!
((-;



MOnty,
if you like, I could try to translate the page
Harald
Click to expand...
very good idea!
just send me your translation & i put it on my page :)
 
CyanJaguar said:
that just shows that I cant trust my ears. I liked it second best of all the mics and it came in last.

I know that warlock liked it best, and another guy on musicplayer liked it second best.

Anyhow.

hey monty,

I did not see the mk416 on the sound room page. I only saw the mk516. Do they sell the mk416 under a different name in the u.s?
Click to expand...
the soundroom only sell the mc51, but write a mail to taylor, he will mabye import the mc416 for you.
 
I actually rated 5 9 & 10 the same...... 10 points. ;)
First I did like the B2 the most... but then when I started to put them in order I couldn't pick the best out of the three......
And I gave 9 points to NT1000 ;)

Keijo
 
Yeah, its a bit awkward. here's the first paragraph on that page, translated.


while November 2001 I have the files of 12 miks, with which I am correct in each case, saxophone & more shaker took up, on does not wet placed thereby was not betrayed, behind which number which is mik, around to an evaluation without influence of label names & price to come I have 30 evaluations get worth between 1 & 10 could do is assigned, 1 for mieserabel, 10 for greatly here is the result:
 
JFogarty said:
Yeah, its a bit awkward. here's the first paragraph on that page, translated.


while November 2001 I have the files of 12 miks, with which I am correct in each case, saxophone & more shaker took up, on does not wet placed thereby was not betrayed, behind which number which is mik, around to an evaluation without influence of label names & price to come I have 30 evaluations get worth between 1 & 10 could do is assigned, 1 for mieserabel, 10 for greatly here is the result:
Click to expand...
better than the most comedys, not?
 
from R.A.P

'During November, 2001 I placed sound files onto the Net of twelve
microphones, each of which I had used to record voice, saxophone
and shaker. But I did not reveal which microphone was used to record
which file, so that people could judge them without the influence of
brand name or price."

"I received 30 ratings. The range which could be given was from
1 to 10, with 1 being 'miserable' and 10 being 'great.' Here are the
results:"

[rank] [microphone] [total points] [average points]

--followed by three columns in which the wav files are
identified for the voice recording, the saxophone recording
and the shaker recording with each microphone on the list.

Then there are comments on the winning and losing microphones.

--best regards
Post a follow-up to this message
 
R.A.P = rec.audio.pro = the newsgroup where bigshots hang out and where newbies get eaten alive.
It's interesting to read, just don't post there :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top