Search results

Thanks to all that made it clear that the majority of you are talentless fat old f*cks wiith no inspiration, humour, wit, graciousness or creativity fact is i have better things to do then talk shop with you dinosaurs. Im fresh, talented and a better musician thanyou basket-cases will ever know...

Over-use of EQ i would imagine! :D

Are you saying i'm wrong? ..or just grandstanding as usual..*sigh* :rolleyes:

:confused:

Thanks again for your feedback. :rolleyes:

Thanks everyone for your feedback. :rolleyes: I think alot of you need to do a little more focusing on the topic at hand rather than kissing each other's ass in locker roomesque bravado.Shameful.I will be looking forward to all your posted threads in the future ~~~ Anyways... REVERB! was just...

LOL..that's funny.It's not to late for you,if you change your attutude now you wont be obsolete next year.There's still hope for you!

This is a discussion forum about mastering.I'm hardly going to write a post asking for everyones view on the weather.I don't think you want to discuss mastering. What is your view on EQ? Do you have an opinion on mastering? Or just an opinion on me...If you have what to discuss mastering...

My point is that payed professional mastering engineers rely to heavily on using an EQ and that there are other resources available (even to you and I) that do they same job but add dimension and clarity without adding loudness.OK, granted that this is a home-recording forum - why should i talk...

I don't understand why anyone would use EQ cutting in mastering more so than EQ boosting in mastering other than it being unfinished from mix-down in which case it should be re-mixed - it's not at a finishing stage.

Umm Hello? I was being sarcasmystical (new word) But im glad you argree. :rolleyes:

Maybe i should Ask Jeeves? I forgot...mastering is all about fixing errors caused in tracking and mix-down. All you need is a EQ - fix it right up! LOL

OMG... salt is good? But seriously... if you wanna use analogies.. Cooks use salt, sure. Do you not add you own salt aswell? no? Would it be too much salt? Like wow, do you think someday they will build audio systems with an intergrated Equalizer? :p

Define "loud"...does it mean when your ears hurt from adding too much volume on the EQ? Using an EQ in this manner will only make your production one-dimensional,noisy and fatiquing to the ear - i mean..where does using an EQ actually stop?.If they're a "loud" group it should have been...

Simply explained, big rooms: bass. medium room: mid .small rooms:treble. Sound balance and definition are easily achievable adding reverb.Im positive most of you have software that enables adding 'room reberb' you just have to balance it.This will add dimension and space rather than frequency...

Well this is the reason i posted my post. It's time for a new attitude. We get all these folk saying how great all these recordings from the 60's/70's sound but yet all these so-called wonderfully crafted albums from the 80's and 90's when EQ's were making such an impact on sound quality failed...

Sorry, but what is your point? are you disagreeing that waves L1 isnt good for dithering..and that you can't get free software from a p2p?..i don't get your angle. :confused:

EQ and mastering should not be used in the same sentence (except now)..I hate the thought that professional mastering engineers would use any kind of EQ in a final master! I'm outraged that people make i living out of primarily using an EQ for mastering!!!!- i don't care if it's loaded with hot...

try Waves L1 Ultramaxermizer plugin if your system is compatable. this FAQ might give you a better understanding. http://www.waves.com/old/htmls/service/faq/idr_faq.html -goodluck

Hello ecktronic, Try browsing http://downloads-zdnet.com.com/3150-2170-0.html?tag=dir which is mostly shareware -if you can't find anything there that is useful i suggest you try a p2p sharing network like limewire where you can download programs from........-goodluck