Search results

Yes, this is my theory about the issue too.

Yeah, but unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. But that takes quite a bit of maths to understand, and this is the wrong place. The argument that digital somehow fails to accurately represent sound has been proven false many times. So the question is rather what analog does to the sound that...

I wouldn't use the word "fails to preserve". "Fails to impose" rather. Otherwise I agree.

"Pity for your hallucinations". Good song title. :)

OK, OK, despise, then? Loathe? Fear? :D

Have you heard of Don Quijote? You don't. Nobody is critizising it. so the questoin is, why do you constantly feel a need to defend it, even in the complete absence of criticism? 1. OK, please quote me where people suggest that you stop using analog. 2. Please quote me the places in the computer...

They don't. There are nobody here that "stands fiercly by digital".

Exactly! Except that after conversion to analog there is nothing "choppy" about it. It just has a upper limit of frequencies, which in theory is 22khz (but in practise is slightly lower, of course). You won't find many vinyls with higher frequencies than that either.

Well, the Zoom 606 output is a line output, so you should put it in the line in. You need to keep your monitoring as accurate as possible. Tweaking the EQ there will usually make things worse. ;) Then again, PC monitors is not exactly ideal from the start, but, that's another issue. If one of...

I feel it's subjective, yes. Can't say I have ever thought of laserdisc as superiour. But then, I haven't made double-blind testing on the issue, so i can't possibly know for sure.

Well, no there are discrete steps there too. But you are right in that low ISO films will have a higher "resolution" than digital. This is however nothing we can see. However, high-class film has grain sizes in the micron-scale. That's at least several hundreds per millimeter. Medium format...

Large film cameras simply have a resolution that would be to expensive to do with digital. Film is in it's nature "digital". There are silver crystals, known as "grains" that get affected by light and turn dark. There is nothing much analog about it. But then again, the same is true for analog...

Well, up until recently, DAW software was a pain in the ass to use. Still aint as easy as tape.

Yes. You missed Reels repetetive unprovoced attacks, and his admission that his apologies are in fact completely insincere lies. He's not sorry, he thinks he have done nothing wrong. He thinks it's OK to insult people for no reason, and obviously enjoys being an asshole. I think it makes him a...

Possibly. But what if I'm not?

So why do you apologize then? In any case it proves what I said: You do not think you said anything wrong, so you your apologies are bogus, so you will soon start your unprovoced attacks on people again, and start hurling insults around for no reason. You are a deeply and genuinely bad person...

well, I can do that, on all pointd except one, noted above. I'm not willing to, once again, forgive somebody who obviously will not learn not to make the same mistake again. However, that noted, this fact does not in any way prevent me from having serious discussions about anything.

No, you have no clue about real insults. This was a thoroughly pathetic attempt, as it lacks any kind of insight. Try again. :p

What is there to recover? I mean, really? If there was something in this thread you actually found interesting, start a new one about that. ;) if you want to continue the religious wars, do that, and I will continue to claim that the religious war between analog and digital is stupid. :p

Besides, I thought Pro Tools was digital, and so it that pocket studio, so hence they must both be crap, right? :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :p