Bummer you’re so far away I was going to say pull the boards (there are two of them siamesed together with the monitor select switches sandwiched between them) and send them to me and I’ll repair it.
“I’m a musician who just wants the gear I own to work properly.”
To which I respond:
“And this is why we don’t have nice things.”
lol…not trying to make fun but that idiom just popped into my head immediately when I read that last sentence of your last post. I can relate and even empathize. I think the reality is, in the realm of vintage equipment, and progressively so as that equipment ages, you either have a good reliable tech at your disposal, or learn how to troubleshoot, diagnose, repair and maintain said vintage equipment, acquiring the necessary tools and diagnostic equipment in the process, -OR- acquire more reliable equipment. Those are your choices because there are **always** issues to varying degrees with which to contend with this bracket of vintage equipment. My Studer console circa 2000 is, relatively speaking, very trouble free, but it also was a high-bracket console in its day and you get what you pay for in terms of performance and reliability. But in the more “budget” bracket (and that’s not meant to be a judgmental statement…the lower cost arena was Tascam’s target with their consoles like the M-200 series) it’s not possible to have all your cake and eat all of it too. In the 1980s, in particular with their Tascam analog audio production equipment, Teac generally did a great job of innovating and incorporating unique and usable feature sets into their products compared to their competitors, and doing so without implementing what I’ll call stupid value-engineering decisions. Sure there was necessary value engineering to meet their objectives, but they were pretty smart about it. But there are still age-related reliability issues stemming from things like the quality of the pots and switches (which were good for the price bracket, and better than many and certainly better than what you’ll find in more contemporary “budget” consoles!), the type of board-to-board and board-to-cable connections (tin-plated steel) as well as issues stemming from the use of phenolic resin PCBs (also very common), so it is what it is. But if you want to use a console like the M-208, and you want it to be dead-nuts fully-operational as much as possible, you have to understand this reality that it will have issues from time to time, and as you are experiencing, every time you open it up and do *anything* you increase the risk of something else going awry. So you either have to be personally prepared to rectify the driving issue and the secondary issue that arises when you crack it open (or tertiary issue, etc.), or have somebody available to do that for you, or replace it with something more reliable, though that understandably comes with compromises either in cost or features or whatever…no free lunches.
Some of us, who are also musicians first, want reliable and tip-top performance so bad, but also have a strong desire to have very specific vintage gear AND know how to fix it themselves they spend years and years…decades even, studying, learning, finding kind people from whom to learn and receive assistance, diving into project after project scalp-deep, and making LOTS of mistakes in order to learn until they can fix most anything that happens with the range of equipment in their fleet. And that essentially describes me. That is the crux of why I deviated at all from a focus on playing and recording was to just learn how to maintain and repair and/or upgrade anything I use. And that bred a curiosity about how different manufactures design their circuits and engineer their product designs, which, along with a journey to find the equipment that best suits me, led to a LOT of different devices coming and going, sometimes just to satisfy the simple curiosity of cracking it open and looking inside. When I started down this path of learning I barely knew the business end of a soldering iron, and certainly couldn’t understand it find my way around any kind of electrical schematic. That’s different today, but of course the deviation comes at a cost too. No free lunches. Our resources both in time and money are always limited.
As to your meter problem, there’s that “mother” PCB that goes across the bottom of the PCBs in the master section. Those connections are notorious for getting oxidized or developing cracked solder joints. You could try gently manipulating those connections where they plug into the MONITOR PCB A & B boards…the one with the monitor level pot and meter source select switch on it, and then there’s the one right next to it to which the other side of the switches are mounted. On the second board the black two pin connector is what goes to the meters. Exercise that. Look for compromised solder joints where the pins of the connector on the board solder to the board. And then where both of those boards connect to the mother PCB. It’s also possible this set of connections where the MONITOR PCB array connect to the MOTHER PCB is the cause of your headphone issue. Run some audio to the headphones and listen while gently manipulating the connections of the MONITOR PCBs to the MOTHER PCB. If you get intermittent signal in both sides of the headphones and also look at the meter performance…if you can get intermittent performance in the meters by gently manipulating the MOTHER PCB connections you may just need to carefully re-seat the MOTHER PCB, or it may need solder joints re-flowed, but it’s totally fixable. It’s also possible the U405 needs replaced for the headphone issue, but I suspect that’s not the case. But those 4000 series logic chips are known to go bad in a number of period Teac products because they chose to power the circuit at the maximum level the chips can handle, which shortens their service life.