songs copyrights in platforms -Like Fiverr-

  • Thread starter Thread starter nrhoven
  • Start date Start date
N

nrhoven

New member
hello,I am Nrhoven
.I am a new member and Ilike to ask something that bothers me a alot.
Is it safe if i send my song to someone in a platform to mix and master it?could he steal my music ?What can I do to ensure that my song remains mine and avoid any type of fraud?
 
hello,I am Nrhoven
.I am a new member and Ilike to ask something that bothers me a alot.
Is it safe if i send my song to someone in a platform to mix and master it?could he steal my music ?What can I do to ensure that my song remains mine and avoid any type of fraud?
I don’t what this means exactly - what do you mean someone in a platform? Fiverr is a Freelance Website - and it’s hit or miss what the people might do with your work - I would assume they do what they say - but you never know - if you can talk to them first you probably get a better idea of what they about - but the first thing you need to do is copywrite your work before you send it off - that’s just smart and will preclude any problems.
 
In most jurisdictions, the copyright is yours as soon as it's written. In addition, recording it to a drive of some sort makes it a physical artefact. The law varies from place to place, and in some countries you are expected to register it - but copyright issues like you are talking about are theft. So there is an element of protection if you could prove to Judge Jury the ownership path.

Of course the practicalities are that the unknown person you are paying little money to could indeed be a crook, but most mastering people don't steal music. If you want an element of protection, then just proving it existed at a certain date is usually sufficient. In the US, actual copyright and all it entails is done by registering the music, but if you just wish to be able to fight theft in court, then the old sending it to yourself by a tracked and recorded service, and then not opening the envelope is evidence of existence you could use in court, and very simple. In the UK, we dont need to register copyright, it comes into being as soon as it's created. The US is a little different, but very similar. You don't have to register it, as like the UK, copyright automatically exists - but your registration system makes it a bit simpler in a dispute.

If you are really worried, go to a well known mastering studio. To be honest, sending your music to a total stranger is more likely to just come back sounding horrible, than you get ripped off. Most people make very little from their music, and the megastar big bucks are pretty unlikely as your music is unlikely to suddenly get millions of streams or downloads, so I suspect the likelihood of dodgy dealing is low, but the basic protection is pretty simple.
 
thank you both for your answers.I came to the conclusion-correct me if I am wrong- that recording it to a drive,may be one basic act for protection,
the other thing is to search for a well known studio.

have a nice day
 
The thing with evidence is that with a drive, you could alter dates - Imagine it's Judge Judy. What would she say?
The post thing, with a drive inside wouldn;t use the dates on the files, but the date on the package. You could have it forensically examined and they would be able to 100% say it had not been opened, and the official stamps on the package state the delivery date. The idea, is that Judge Judy could open it and what was inside on that date becomes evidence. If the date pre-dates the so called product was released under somebody else's name, then you had it first. You would still need to present this evidence to a court, and if you wind, costs are paid from the other side. In most historic cases, the fact you have the unopened envelope, means the other side gives in. Sometimes, like with the famous cases - Barry Manilow and George Michael, for example - neither side gives in and neither side was poor. This is sadly how rights protection works. Take the basic protection, make sure you nicely make this known to the mastering person, and they won't do anything.
I'm sitting on a recording I made in 1994. A terrible performance by a student of mine. Mind bogglingly awful. When she became mega famous I got a letter from her legal people at the record company. Basically preventing me from letting anyone hear it, using it, or allowing others to use it. It's been very tempting over the years, but frankly - I'm poor, she has very expensive lawyers. I probably have the ownership of the recording, but she is the performer so I couldn't be sure of the outcome. Rights are never 100%.
 
Thank you Rob for your answer and your time .
I think I will go safe with the post.

Have a nice day!
 
Back
Top