Can Clicks kill the life in a recording ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grimtraveller
  • Start date Start date
When I was drumming in a band, we had backing tracks, so every song was played to a click. I actually prefer it.
 
The rest of the band should react to the drummers feel, because the drums are actually part of the music, the metronome is not. If everyone plays to the metronome, no one is playing together and everyones performance will relate to something that will not be heard as part of the song.
That sounds more like a very plausible justification of not using a metronome ! In fact, if your overall point is understood, I think you might leave a number of people thinking "then why use a click if you're recording with a drummer ?"
 
I try to avoid this myself. But, for your listening pleasure, listen carefully to the drum intro to Weezer's "Undone - The Sweater Song". The click from the dummer's headphones comes through in the overheads.

Lol I never would have noticed but its defiantly there. My bandmates are real haters of the click track as we prefer to track live. For our next album there are some time restraints with the drummer. No pun intended. And Overdubs might be the only way to go. To me the thought of overdubbing without a click is very scary.
 
A band I work with has just gotten a real drummer after four years of Acid Pro drums. It was a convenient expedient for those years but there's something about the real drummer that's so much nicer to listen to. Some of it is the sound of the drums, but a lot is the natural interaction between the players. I will say that the guys playing to the looped drums really improved their timing.
 
That sounds more like a very plausible justification of not using a metronome ! In fact, if your overall point is understood, I think you might leave a number of people thinking "then why use a click if you're recording with a drummer ?"

To keep the drummer in tempo. The metronome is just there to keep the tempo from changing. The feel still needs to come from the band playing with/against each other. A real groove has a steady tempo, the click provides the steady tempo, the drummer plays to it and the band grooves around the drummer.
 
A real groove has a steady tempo, the click provides the steady tempo, the drummer plays to it and the band grooves around the drummer.

This is what so many click haters never get. They don't understand how you can "groove" when you have a steady click going....and they think "groove" really means NOT having any kind of steady tempo.
 
This is what so many click haters never get. They don't understand how you can "groove" when you have a steady click going....and they think "groove" really means NOT having any kind of steady tempo.
While the idea of a click track isn't new to me, the concept of professional musicians who have spent a lot of time in the studio recording using click tracks is new to me. That is something that I never considered. That is what I like about this place, I am always learning something new.
 
The use of click tracks I would say is a studio "invention"....so yeah, it's been pretty common for recording.
 
While the idea of a click track isn't new to me, the concept of professional musicians who have spent a lot of time in the studio recording using click tracks is new to me. That is something that I never considered. That is what I like about this place, I am always learning something new.
That has been the case for a very long time. All those old 70's disco songs were done to clicks. There are other examples, but that is the most obvious. Money, by Pink Floyd was played to the loop of cash registers as a metronome. (until the 4/4 part)
 
Money, by Pink Floyd was played to the loop of cash registers as a metronome. (until the 4/4 part)
Five years before that, they did a loop of a Nick Mason drum part on "Saucerful of secrets" and played the middle section to that. It's a freeform piece, one of the earliest avant garde pieces of rock, nascent progressive rock, at that. But the rock steady timing and the fact that you hear it very clearly do not detract from the piece at all. Indeed, it forms the centrepiece of that particular section.
 
I once recorded "O Come O Come Emmanuel" for a vocalist. I played the piano part in with feeling and verve and then sat down with my DAW (Cakewalk at the time) and was amazed at how much tempo change went on. It sounded marvelouse, dah-ling, so I went ahead and "built" the click track around the performance and added drums, bass and pads on top of the varying click. Took a lot of work, but she was very pleased.
I know of at least one major performing drummer that has a "click" run into his monitors from the keyboardist's computer. I complimented him on his "perfect" live performances and he said as much. So using a live click is not unheard of, either.

If anyone's ever seen Steven Wilson play, then his syncing of video to the music can only be done by time mapping, so I suspect his various drummers are playing to a click of some sort..
 
apparently chic didn't use click tracks! have you heard how in time and tight they sounded? I'm talking about the original chic not the modern version
Clicks don't make the band in time with each other or play tighter, they keep the tempo constant.

Do you really think that Le Freak is exactly 120 bpm from start to finish by accident? There was some sort of metronome involved.
 
Do you really think that Le Freak is exactly 120 bpm from start to finish by accident? There was some sort of metronome involved.
There wasn't. These are Nile Rogers own words;
"The rhythm track was always played completely live, without a click track, and we'd select one particular take. No song that we ever, ever, ever recorded was compiled from different takes. We knew which take was it because that's the one we kept, and then we'd overdub onto that. There are no alternative takes on anything. If we weren't satisfied with a take, it didn't live. We'd make up our minds right on the spot — we'd play it, listen to it and go 'Uh, that was good. Let's try another one.' And then if we tried another one and it was better, that's the one we would keep and we'd erase the other one. So, there is only one 'Le Freak'.

"I almost wish the world was like that now"
from this Sound on Sound interview.
I also recall, in the vague mists of time, possibly before I got into recording, reading or hearing one of the Bee Gees saying that in the disco era, a drummer's quality was often gauged by their ability to remain at 120BPM throughout a song. They often didn't play to metronomes but to test them, they'd time them; "how many beats did that cat play in that minute ? !"
 
A couple of quotes from people that engineered during the disco era, for balance;
Right at the beginning real drums with lots of gate and compression. Some people used loops to get the beat dead on. The Roland TR66 came out in 1975ish and was sometimes used with compression and gates.

1980 - Then a click or similar


EARL YOUNG DID NOT DO LOOPS LIKE PEOPLE THINK..he did full albums beds alone!

Once I saw him play thru 3 15 ips 24 track reels with NO click track so that later on Vince Montana could make songs from his tracks
So it obviously worked both ways.
 
When a song is 120 BPM you can just use an analog clock as the metronome. :D
 
There wasn't. These are Nile Rogers own words;
from this Sound on Sound interview.
I also recall, in the vague mists of time, possibly before I got into recording, reading or hearing one of the Bee Gees saying that in the disco era, a drummer's quality was often gauged by their ability to remain at 120BPM throughout a song. They often didn't play to metronomes but to test them, they'd time them; "how many beats did that cat play in that minute ? !"
Yes, and Eddie Van Halen used a variac on his marshall that was modded by that guy, and a lot of other stories that didnt happen, that made those guy seem like gods that no one could touch. I can't tell you how many stories like that I've found out were complete hogwash designed to either bolster their legend or throw people off when trying to copy them.
 
Yes, and Eddie Van Halen used a variac on his marshall that was modded by that guy, and a lot of other stories that didnt happen, that made those guy seem like gods that no one could touch. I can't tell you how many stories like that I've found out were complete hogwash designed to either bolster their legend or throw people off when trying to copy them.
I'm not really interested in what Eddie did or didn't do.
And I'm also dubious about many of the stories that 'celebs' tell.
But face it, the overwhelming majority of recordings done that involved drums or percussion up until the start of the 80s didn't involve click tracks or metronomes {though for balance, I demonstrated that Pink Floyd did as early as 1968}. Orchestras had conductors. Latin percussionists had super timing. Jazz drummers deliberately played about with the tempo. Even lowly pop/rock bands like the Beatles had many of their early records being the result of edits of two or three takes. Why ? Because they were so tight that the various takes hardly differed in tempo so they were easy to line up.
All I was doing was responding to your comment about all disco tracks being recorded with clicks. And to be fair and to show balance, I also included quotes that showed some were.
Clicks as a standard tool of recording is a relatively modern thing. But for a heck of a lot of musicians, recording without metronomic assisstance is also a matter of pride, rather like a carpenter that uses a manual saw rather than an electric one.
If Nile Rogers says Chic never used clicks back in the day, I've no reason to disbelieve him.
I wasn't there.
 
Clicks don't make the band in time with each other or play tighter, they keep the tempo constant.

Do you really think that Le Freak is exactly 120 bpm from start to finish by accident? There was some sort of metronome involved.

absolute rubbish! bob clearmount says otherwise in interviews about mixing chic in the late 70s, the man would not lie.
 
Back
Top