Exactly.
I asked in the other "Scholz" thread...what was the goal of the thread?
To prove something beyond a shadow of doubt...or to just kick the can on topics that have been ongoing for years across many forums by many people, pro and amateur alike....?
Bringing up Scholz as the possible "demon seed" of pro-analog/anti-digital views is rather funny.

I'm not defending Scholz, just pointing out that his comments are not threatening anyone's choices...which I guess is what the opposing point was about when his name was mentioned in the other thread, that somehow he started the anti-digital buzz and is responsible for its perpetuation because of some comments in an interview...
...which IMHO is not the case.
The more technical statements made by Scholz are still being made by some top engineers. They still feel that sampling at any rate is slicing and then assembling and interpolating the pieces in order to assemble the audio signal in a digital format, and that they find less than "real" to how analog works....and while at certain bit depths and sampling rates, that can be "acceptable" even to them, they still profess that analog audio sounds better....to them.
Some people need/want someone else to make the decisions for them...to tell them what format they should use, and that their choices are the better choices...etc. Most folks on home-rec forums and audio forums in general have adopted digital mainly for its inexpensive ease of use, and not from hands-on comparisons and tests...and they want affirmation that their choices are acceptable to.......?
Any mention of analog gear and tape recording yielding a better and more pleasing sound...is met with more and more outrage as digital usage spreads.
In the early days of the migration...there were a lot of analog users attacking the digital proponents...but from what I've seen on audio forums, those "attacks" pretty much subsided about 8-10 years ago, and the analog/tape-only folks were happy to pull back into their own (and what has now become a) niche environment.
Not really sure what conclusions will be arrived at here?
If this is all just so we can argue about what Tom Scholz has said as true/false...that will be entertaining enough, but then you might as well pull in dozens and dozens of audio pros who still harbor strong, educated, experienced views on either side of the analog/digital fence, and then also bring their views and interviews into the discussion.
It ain't just about Scholz.
I think it might be best to just not bother with yet one more analog/digital debate, because in the end, little will be proven no matter how many "skilled/experienced" people reply. Use what you use for whatever reason you use it...and go recording some music.