T
Twinhit
You gotta speak up!
I pesonally think the "energy and feel" argument is often rather overstated: First, the "energy and feel" of live performance seems to happen a lot easier in a bar at 1AM than in a studio at 3PM. Second, when you actually play back such live "energy and feel" moments caught on tape, that "energy and feel" often winds up being more a matter of experiencing the moment though Budweiser-colored cans than an actual lightning-in-the-bottle moment of performance excellence. Third, a good guitarist (just for an example) should be able to get just as much "energy and feel" listening to the drums whether those drums are being played now live or now through a playback. Fourth, if the guitarist (again, just for an example) makes a mistake in the fifth measure, it's a lot cleaner to punch in on a separate track than it is on a live mix track. And finally, the whole "energy and feel" starts to head out the door right about when the tracking engineer hits that talkback switch and announces, "Let's try that again" for the third or fourth fourth take.
I'm not dissing live-style recording, it has it's own advantages and charms. I'm just saying that the whole "getting that live energy and feel" thing ain't all its cracked up to be either.
IMHO, IME, YMMV, ADAT, MBC, ETC.
G.
ABC, NBC, CBS AND BBC, ETC....., YMMV, IMHO.....
Curiously, could the band simply drink a pint of JD at three or would it HAVE to be a simple case of drinkin' beer for
breakfast and 20 more for dessert to get that LIVE feel at 3pm in the studio?
Maybe someone will come out with a Live at the Bar Night fitness program for X-box and the band could get drunk and
play to screamin' rowdy dancin' carousin' fans who are themselves displayed on a real big LCD screen.
Different dances for different styles of music. Maybe put some punk rockers in a country scene line dancin' and
some hillbillies breakdancin to rap or somethin.
Whatcha think? Think that would help, too?