
Sky Blue Lou
Well-known member
Old wood is good wood, eh? Maybe it's a function of the wood and stresses in construction. Does vibration play any part? I dunno dunno.
lou
lou
I guess my tendency would be to go with that answer. You talk about tests and whatnot. Has the subject been "laboratory" tested and disproved?
Timber and it's relative properties play a huge part in the subjective value of an instrument. The key is in the word subjective.Old wood is good wood, eh? Maybe it's a function of the wood and stresses in construction. Does vibration play any part? I dunno dunno.
lou
I guess my tendency would be to go with that answer. You talk about tests and whatnot. Has the subject been "laboratory" tested and disproved?
lou
It's probably fairly heavy reading - I'll take yer word for it.I could point you at some if you are interested.
It's probably fairly heavy reading - I'll take yer word for it.
Have you ever heard of the guy in northern central USA (Wisconsin, Minnesota...?) that started a huge business salvaging sunken timber from the old river log drives? These are 100+ year old oaks and maples and such the size of which you just can't get anymore. He had furniture and instrument makers all agog a few years back. Don't know what came of it but I saw a show on TV back then and it looked pretty interesting. Somebody was going nuts about making violins out of this preserved old wood.
lou
So I bet you don't believe in love, either
Cya- I have to go home...
Just taking the piss, feel free to ignore if you like:
"[W]e all know guitars get better sounding with age, and part of that aging process is being subjected to string vibrations that act upon the wood and entrain it to respond sympathetically and in with more euphonic sound."
Well, I don't know about strings acting upon the wood, but I suppose the guitar as a system will age. Timber, joints, glue, structure, strings,etc... all will age, like a newly built house settling after the first few season cycles. Whether it sounds better or not is probably 90% chance and 10% design.
What happens to wood as it ages?? Maybe outgasses CO2 and absorbs water... Maybe the vibrating strings expedite the process, but would it really make any difference? Seems negligable to me.... but what do I know?
And as for vintage pickups vs NOS pickups: There's too many other variables to consider before age plays a factor. imho, of course....![]()
Im back...
OK- so we're on the same page. As wood ages, it changes and affects the tone of the guitar.
Whether it affects it positively or adversely is in the ears of the beholder. My ears tell me that usually it's for the better.
Add to that years and years of vibrations, and that wood, glue and everything else is surely gonna settle into a state different from where it started.
That was a long way around to an agreement
The thing about the P/Us, however, is just a hunch. I've heard it, but it makes no sense to me why.
At about the 20 year mark, I took out the cymbal and it was completely different,
Even cymbals change with age, and sometimes radically. I have a cymbal I bought in the mid-70's. It's a 22" swish and it was always extremely loud and somewhat unruly. I used it for about 10 years like that and then put it in my cymbal bag.
At about the 20 year mark, I took out the cymbal and it was completely different, and I'm not talking about from being covered with grime. The metal changed. The disagreements worked themselves out. Now it's super playable. The typical thing of "less treble" with age. Who would think that metal would do that.
I tend to not like new acoustic instruments. The best guitars I've worked with (I don't play guitar) are Martins from the 1920's and 30's. I use mostly old K cymbals from the 1950's and my drums are Gretsch from that era and some Ludwigs.