
Monkey Allen
Fork and spoon operator
You can configure your room and learn your monitors and produce decent results with pretty much any old mid range 'monitors' right? Mackies, Yamaha, M-Audio...
Interesting post.No one is saying that anyone *needs* anything -- We're saying that "if you don't want to make excuses then you're going to need..."
Not every aspiring race car driver can afford a Ferrari - But he should understand that his Chevy, while a fine and decent car, isn't going to top 190MPH on a curve.
It's here all the time - "How do I get professional results with..." and "Why don't my mixes done with $200 monitors sound like..."
There are realistic expectations and unrealistic expectations. And if someone can't hear the complete range accurately and consistently, he shouldn't even have expectations. All other things being equal, the monitoring chain is the deciding factor - of everything. Every single sonic decision made from mic selection and placement through the finished mix is based on how your monitoring translates to your brain.
Nice... I'm a heavy-cruiser pilot myself, so although I reflexively think you're slightly insane, I have much respect for the brass you've got clanging.I don't race cars, but do hold an Expert motorcycle roadracing license.
Totally agree and immersed myself in such things when I was a 'noob' myself. These days, it gets difficult sometimes and at some forums...When I first started racing, I was given an invaluable piece of advice by an experienced racer, and IMHO it applies to anything in life that you want to get better at. "If someone with a single-digit number (pro or championship level racer, pro recording/mastering engineer in our analogy) shares their approach to something - listen. Listen carefully."
Interesting post.
As both a club racer and a recording musician I can relate to the point you're trying to make. But...
Let me make some additional analogies.
I don't race cars, but do hold an Expert motorcycle roadracing license.
In any type of racing, there are multiple classes. The guy on the vintage Honda 350 doesn't compete directly against the guy on the Suzuki 650 lightweight twin and neither one competes directly against the racers on the open-class 1000cc superbikes. That being said, I have seen racers on the vintage bikes turn lap times competitive with the lightweight twins and there are guys on the lightweight twins who go fast enough to earn a podium spot if they were to run with the superbikes. And conversely, I've seen neophyte racers on the best equipment available be slow enough that they were basically mobile chicanes to others in their class.
One of the problems we face as home recordists or recording musicians working in a hobby studio environment is that those separate, distinct classes don't exist. To the listener, it's all just music.
Now, how is it that some guys on the "slower" bikes (home/hobby studio) can be faster (make better sounding recordings) than some guys on the "fastest" bikes (high dollar "perfect" studios)?
Several reasons.
Reason number one - know your equipment and how to operate it. A person who knows the limits of their 70 horsepower motorcycle (home/hobby studio) can squeeze more out of it than the person hopping on a full on superbike (pro/"perfect" studio) if they're highly proficient or just plain talented.
Reason number two - tuning. Someone who takes the time and puts forth the effort to learn and apply the precise suspension settings, tire pressures and engine tweaks (microphone selection & placement, gain staging and room setup) can, when coupled with inherent talent (uh... inherent talent) outperform someone with the hottest bike out there that isn't set up properly (great speakers and mics, etc., improperly placed).
Reason number three - flat out desire and belief in their ability to succeed. Irrespective of the endeavor, someone who is determined to do their homework and keep learning is more likely to get great results.
The bottom line is that excellent equipment is definitely a plus, but the most important thing is for people to use whatever they have to the best of their abilities - and keep refining and improving those abilities. The quest to refine and improve those abilities is what keeps bringing people here, and keeps them asking what many experts and pros see as redundant or stupid questions. Those "same old questions" aren't redundant or stupid to the person whose body of knowledge is in an embryonic state. A racer doesn't jump out on a new track and immediately start turning their best lap times. They have to learn the track. And at that point it doesn't matter if they have the fastest, most state of the art motorcycle. It's the loose nut that connects the handlebars to the seat that makes the most difference.
When I first started racing, I was given an invaluable piece of advice by an experienced racer, and IMHO it applies to anything in life that you want to get better at. "If someone with a single-digit number (pro or championship level racer, pro recording/mastering engineer in our analogy) shares their approach to something - listen. Listen carefully."
Not really. Setting them up on their sides really just messes with the stereo imaging. The frequency response remains pretty well intact. So crap speakers set up properly might have better imaging than good speakers set up wrong, but the good ones will probably still be more accurate.I'm guessing lesser equipment set up propelry will sound at least as good as more expensive gear set up incorrectly.
Not really. Setting them up on their sides really just messes with the stereo imaging. The frequency response remains pretty well intact. So crap speakers set up properly might have better imaging than good speakers set up wrong, but the good ones will probably still be more accurate.
Would love to some day. I have enough of a hard time remembering how to get around Road Atlanta, would probably need a GPS at Nurburgring.btw LDS if you ever get a chance to run the nurburgring it will be something you'll never forget...just remember where you see crowds of spectators thats where the crashes happen, they aint there to cheer you![]()
![]()
Would love to some day. I have enough of a hard time remembering how to get around Road Atlanta, would probably need a GPS at Nurburgring.
I know all about the crowds of spectators at the crash spots from running off-road cross country races.![]()
Not really. Setting them up on their sides really just messes with the stereo imaging. The frequency response remains pretty well intact. So crap speakers set up properly might have better imaging than good speakers set up wrong, but the good ones will probably still be more accurate.
Don't recall saying crap speakers versus good speakers. I said less expensive versus more expensive. I just don't get why people put all that money in to high end stuff then set it up wrong. Or build a really nice studio, have mics like Neumans and then record with a Squire guit. Bottom line, you can't polish a turd.
It starts from the ground up mate. You can't start with a poor quality source then try to make it sound good after the fact.
My point was that I can't understand people spending a ton in one area then totally skimping in another. Or spending a ton then setting the stuff up wrong.
While it's true that one shouldn't aim for this nor advise sloppiness and "couldn't care lessism", not only can you polish turds, you can make them good enough to eat ! Almost.It starts from the ground up mate. You can't start with a poor quality source then try to make it sound good after the fact.
What I don't understand is how people don't understand progression, learning and joy. When many start out, they may have dreamed of having one particular super bit of gear. They get it. They don't have the cash for big plunders in other departments or perhaps the present knowledge or experience to know that they may need this or that. The day Eddie Kramer or Bruce Swedien started engineering, they didn't know which kind of mics went best with which voices.....my point is that all these things take time and many {most ?} home recorders, from what I've picked up are more conscious of simply recording their stuff initially than all the 'big deal touring' that comes after.My point was that I can't understand people spending a ton in one area then totally skimping in another.
That's the joy of progression. We do. We ponder. We learn. We re-learn. We progress.Or spending a ton then setting the stuff up wrong.
get your point...but its wrong![]()