Thoughts on my new Orange Thunder 30 head

  • Thread starter Thread starter thebigcheese
  • Start date Start date
thebigcheese

thebigcheese

"Hi, I'm in Delaware."
Being a little impulsive, I decided to put in my order for the new Thunder 30 head before it was shipping, so now that I finally have it sitting here in my house, I thought I post my thoughts on it for those considering picking one up.

First, the gear I'm using. I'm playing in a small basement that isn't very well treated, so that colors the sound a little bit (but I often sit right in front of the amp, so not that much). I'm plugging the amp into a 1x12 cabinet I made--it's half-open in back and it's loaded with an Eminence Cannabis Rex speaker. I have a 1979 Gibson The Paul (which is a walnut guitar) and a fairly recent G&L Legacy.

The amp features two footswitchable channels, 3 speaker outputs (two @ 8 ohms, one @ 16 ohms), and can run on 4 or 2 power tubes. You can also switch the output between full and half, though I have found that it doesn't seem to make much difference. In fact, 2 tubes vs 4 tubes isn't that much quieter, either. This amp is not really meant for quiet practicing.

The amp itself is, like other Orange amps, quite sturdy. The handle seems a little less solid than I was expecting, but probably nothing to worry about. The amp is a good deal bigger than I thought it was going to be, though I suppose it's about standard head size (not quite as wide as, say, a Dual Rectifier, but just as tall). It looks a little silly sitting on my 1x12 box, though, considering it's half as tall and wider...

The clean channel has three controls: volume, bass, and treble. As I understand it, the bass control also handles the mids to the extent that turning it up is supposed to cut some of the mids. That does seem to be the case, though that obviously means that you have to have more bass if you want to cut the mids, which is not always preferable. The treble control does what you'd think it would do, though there seems to be a range on most of the controls on this amp where there are only slight adjustments possible, despite what seems to be a huge tonal difference from one side to the other. Having said that, two controls is plenty for the Legacy, which sounds really great through this amp. It's warmer than, say, a Vox Night Train (which is what I was using until now), but definitely not as bright/present as that amp (or a Twin Reverb, probably). As I said, that works out quite well for the Legacy, but The Paul could use a bit of brightening up, in my opinion. It is a bassy guitar and not as bright as the Legacy, but cutting the bass some helps. It's fine for live, though I'd probably EQ it when recording. At the end of the day, I guess I would say that it's a fairly standard Orange clean tone. It can go pretty loud, but turn it more than about halfway with the Legacy (and less with The Paul) and you'll start getting some crunch in there. Not that that's a bad thing, but it does inhibit the clean volume.

Flip it to the dirty channel and you have gain, shape, and volume controls. Cranking the gain control way up provides more gain than I will ever need and certainly enough for any type of metal. With The Paul, palm muting gets a little less chuggy and a bit more spongey on higher gain settings, but rolling it back some and putting an OD pedal in front of the amp clears that right up. The Legacy doesn't suffer from the same problems, probably because it's not as bassy to begin with. You can also dial the gain way back and get a clean sound, or just stick somewhere in the middle for more of a rock sound. The shape control is useful to an extent, though I suspect I will likely just leave it where it is. All the way counter-clockwise gives you nothing but mids; conversely, all the way clockwise gives you all bass and treble. I don't think I would use either extreme, but just a bit scooped (about 2 o'clock) is where I like it best. A bit more to the left and you'd get a more classic rock tone. Actually, the scooped tone could be useful on cleaner gain settings to drag a bit more sparkle out of The Paul.

Taken as a whole, the amp gets quite loud, perhaps a little louder than my 50-watt speaker is ready to handle. Hum is more prevalent than I remember it being on other amps I've owned (a Fender Blues Jr. and the Vox Night Train), but seems to be mostly related to the Legacy. Some better shielding and some ground loop elimination would probably go a long way.

I also use the effects loop, though only with one pedal. It is very transparent with just my TC Nova Delay in the loop, though adding a custom reverb pedal seemed to quiet the signal down and change the color a bit. I decided that was probably the pedal's fault and took it back out. The Nova Delay gets subtle enough to be mistaken for reverb, anyway. It's also worth noting that I run a rather full pedalboard in front of the amp and there doesn't appear to be any major tonal changes vs going straight into the amp.

All in all, the Thunder 30 is a very good, relatively versatile amp, though it is not perfect for all situations. It is more of a modern rocker than a classic rocker, though that depends on the classic band we are referencing (it would do Van Halen quite nicely). Not as sparkly as a Vox or a Twin Reverb, but the dirty channel absolutely blows away anything you'll find on amps from either of those companies, so decide for yourself what's most important. I, for one, am not disappointed.
 
The clean channel has three controls: volume, bass, and treble. As I understand it, the bass control also handles the mids to the extent that turning it up is supposed to cut some of the mids. That does seem to be the case, though that obviously means that you have to have more bass if you want to cut the mids, which is not always preferable. The treble control does what you'd think it would do, though there seems to be a range on most of the controls on this amp where there are only slight adjustments possible, despite what seems to be a huge tonal difference from one side to the other.

Flip it to the dirty channel and you have gain, shape, and volume controls.

I had to read this several times because I couldn't believe my eyes. An amp that costs around $1199 and has eq controls akin to what you would find on a Barbie clock radio. :eek: Excuse me while I go and ROFL.
 
I had to read this several times because I couldn't believe my eyes. An amp that costs around $1199 and has eq controls akin to what you would find on a Barbie clock radio. :eek: Excuse me while I go and ROFL.

The Rocker 30's clean channel has only a volume knob. The Tiny Terror has just a shape knob for EQ. Orange's philosophy seems to be that if you plug a good guitar in, it will sound great. If you don't, it won't. (In fact, here are the designer's thoughts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBm9JKisP7Y) Both of my guitars are at least decent, so they both sound reasonably good. It's maybe not the best amp for guitarists who need a lot of variety, but for people like me who tend to set the controls once and then leave them, there's not a whole lot of point to having a bunch of EQ knobs if just a couple will get me what I need. I was playing around with the Mesa amps before I got this one, but most of them were nothing special and had far too many options. So I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

As an addendum to my write-up, let me also say that this amp has punch! A lot of amps I've played will give you a decent amount of bass, but it's always just sort of... there. This amp has the tightest bass of all the amps I can remember playing, so the tone never gets muddied up.
 
Orange's philosophy seems to be that if you plug a good guitar in, it will sound great. If you don't, it won't.

So if you plug your guitar into an Orange amp and it sounds crappy then you must not have a good guitar. Because there is just no way that one of their amps could possibly suck. What does a "good guitar" sound like? According to Orange's philosophy they must all sound exactly alike. That's why proper eq controls are not necessary on their amps. And speakers must all sound alike as well which means midrange and presence controls are not required. Are people actually dumb enough to believe that nonsense?
 
I would imagine that, basic settings aside, there's at least a need to do a bit of EQ shaping in live settings depending upon the room you're playing in... asuming your'e not miking it, that is...
 
So if you plug your guitar into an Orange amp and it sounds crappy then you must not have a good guitar. Because there is just no way that one of their amps could possibly suck. What does a "good guitar" sound like? According to Orange's philosophy they must all sound exactly alike. That's why proper eq controls are not necessary on their amps. And speakers must all sound alike as well which means midrange and presence controls are not required. Are people actually dumb enough to believe that nonsense?
Most people who have the Rocker 30 love it, so it seems to be working out. I'm not saying that I wouldn't like to have a mids and presence control on this amp, because I would, but they aren't completely necessary to get a good sound. The Legacy sounds quite good, but a mids and presence control would be nice for my boomy Paul. I'd probably just get an EQ pedal for that, though.

If you want three-band EQ on both channels, the Rockerverb amps have those. I got this one because it was lower wattage (my speaker is only a 50w speaker) and it was about half the price. And also because, if I ever need those additional tone controls, I'll just get an EQ pedal. Much cheaper than buying a Mesa, and the amp sounds much better, too.
 
So if you plug your guitar into an Orange amp and it sounds crappy then you must not have a good guitar. Because there is just no way that one of their amps could possibly suck. What does a "good guitar" sound like? According to Orange's philosophy they must all sound exactly alike. That's why proper eq controls are not necessary on their amps. And speakers must all sound alike as well which means midrange and presence controls are not required. Are people actually dumb enough to believe that nonsense?
It's like anything else; they put it out there and let the market decide. If it sells, it was the right offering. One amp I have has one control - a combination on-off switch and volume pot. It sounds great.
 
It's like anything else; they put it out there and let the market decide. If it sells, it was the right offering. One amp I have has one control - a combination on-off switch and volume pot. It sounds great.

And a car with no headlights works great in the daytime. I just hate to see people falling for Orange's hype and getting totally ripped off. For about the same price as the Thunder 30 you can get a Carvin VL2100 which by comparison makes the Orange look like something that you would buy at Walmart. But if someone wants to flush their money down the toilet then whatever.
 
And a car with no headlights works great in the daytime. I just hate to see people falling for Orange's hype and getting totally ripped off. For about the same price as the Thunder 30 you can get a Carvin VL2100 which by comparison makes the Orange look like something that you would buy at Walmart. But if someone wants to flush their money down the toilet then whatever.
That's your opinion, I guess, but Orange sells lots of amps and their customers cannot all be braindead. Like I said, let the market decide. I don't own any Orange equipment (though I may buy one of their small bass amps), so I don't have a dog in this hunt. I have a couple of friends who have them, though, and they seem happy.
 
Most people who have the Rocker 30 love it, so it seems to be working out.

The flip side of that, of course, is that most people who don't love a Rocker 30 don't buy one.

My only experience so far with Orange was with a Tiny Terror, which I hated. It just wasn't my thing at all. Is this anything similar, tonally?
 
Orange sells lots of amps and their customers cannot all be braindead.

I never said that anyone was braindead. "Brainwashed" would be a much more appropriate term.


I have a couple of friends who have them, though, and they seem happy.

Dogs seem quite happy to eat Alpo until they get a taste of what you're eating.
 
I never said that anyone was braindead. "Brainwashed" would be a much more appropriate term.
Dogs seem quite happy to eat Alpo until they get a taste of what you're eating.

Whatever blows (or doesn't blow) your skirt up. Chocolate is very bad for dogs, BTW, however much they like it. :D
 
Whatever blows (or doesn't blow) your skirt up. Chocolate is very bad for dogs, BTW, however much they like it. :D

Well now you're finally making some sense. What about feeding chocolate to an orange amp? Will it roll over and play dead?
 
Well now you're finally making some sense. What about feeding chocolate to an orange amp? Will it roll over and play dead?

No, but feeding oranges to a dog will make him fart in Eb.
 
I wuv my JCM 800 2204 head + cab - used it for a lot of gigs and some recording, and it only has bass,mid,treble, and presence (the last of which is normally all the way down). I think I paid like 1200 for the head and cab in the mid 80's. Not all guitars sound good through it, but many do.
 
Back
Top