Scale Length - 24.75" VS 25.5"

  • Thread starter Thread starter miroslav
  • Start date Start date
miroslav said:
That's cool...we're cool. :drunk:

I guess you do have a sense for humor. :D

So just to confirm...are you SURE math has nothing to do with guitar scale length? :confused:

:laughings:
Click to expand...

A string under tension will vibrate. How you employ that phenomena is art and craft not science and maths.

And I'm a scientist.;)
 
ggunn said:
Chemistry is a Pauling.
Physics is a Bohr.
Click to expand...

Excellent.

Pythagoras did something Euclid was too proud to do: test his theories in the real world. Too bad, P. That's the sign of a prole.
 
lpdeluxe said:
Excellent.

Pythagoras did something Euclid was too proud to do: test his theories in the real world. Too bad, P. That's the sign of a prole.
Click to expand...

Euclid's "Elements" was and is "the" text book for teaching geometry, math, conic sections, et al....It's thousands of years old but still relevant, That is genius.

I love Pythagoras but seriously, he was a dude, Euclid was a genius.;)
 
201844037_7dbd27025f.jpg
 
man ..... did doc take over muttley's account for a little while?

:laughings::laughings:
 
He looks pissed off in the pitcure...he must have messed up the calculation...that explains a lot about Fenders!

:laughings:

;)
 
muttley600 said:
Euclid's "Elements" was and is "the" text book for teaching geometry, math, conic sections, et al....It's thousands of years old but still relevant, That is genius.

I love Pythagoras but seriously, he was a dude, Euclid was a genius.;)
Click to expand...

Haha. I remember writing a booklet in junior high geometry which I thought was a terribly daring thing to do: in about 8 folded pages I explored some of the implications of "non-Euclidean" geometry. I don't think I would have called it "non-Pythagorean" geometry. Maybe if I were writing about scale lengths. I don't know that Mr E discussed electric guitars.
 
lpdeluxe said:
Haha. I remember writing a booklet in junior high geometry which I thought was a terribly daring thing to do: in about 8 folded pages I explored some of the implications of "non-Euclidean" geometry. I don't think I would have called it "non-Pythagorean" geometry. Maybe if I were writing about scale lengths. I don't know that Mr E discussed electric guitars.
Click to expand...
His best work was to do with conic sections.

What a guy..:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top