Obi T-Racks 3 Deluxe Review

  • Thread starter Thread starter ObiAudio.com
  • Start date Start date
ObiAudio.com

ObiAudio.com

New member
Well after a lot of hours digging in I thought I'd give you guys a update!


T-Racks 3 Deluxe Review




T-Racks has been around for about as long if not longer than a lot of DAW's. It has been synonymous with quality, professionalism and the choice of top pros. Now lets take a step back. IK Multimedia. Creaters of Amplitube, Ampeg SVX and the newest Amplitube Fender. Each one of these have their places in top studios across the world. Well IK Multimedia is known for their knack to model analogue gear to the T, I mean right down to the little things that make a piece of gear special and quit honestly their one of the best to ever do it. Now they have just released the third generation of T-Racks and wow, they have outdone themselves. I have used a few plug ins in my time but these are special. The T-Racks 3 Deluxe is the 4 classic tools found in the last generation of T-Racks with the addition of 5 new plug ins, 2 of which are revered and favored among the engineering world. The Fairchild and the Pultec. Both favored for their classic color and saturation both present. In the following we will break each plug in down AND figure out how to use them to compliment your tracks!

First we will look at the classic T-Racks processors and figure out just why they are so loved! There are 4 modules in the classic part of T-Racks. T-Racks Equalizer is a 6 band equalizer that can work in both L/R modes but also can be used in Mid Side which is great for eqing that stereo signal! (We will cover this a bit more later.) This EQ has been a go to for many engineers for a reason! The T-Racks Compressor is a versatile compressor with a stereo enhancement that can help widen your mixes. The T-Racks Multiband Limiter that can help compress your mixes in a more precise manner. A lot of times if you use a basic compressor but the low end is out of hand it can ruin your whole mix by compressing more than it should and make the song song "off". With a Multiband limiter it is much like having multiple compressors for a specific frequncy range. So on that same low end problematic mix you can have separate settings for the lows, mids and highs and make the mix sound a bit more balanced! Then there is the T-Racks Soft Clipper. You use the Soft-clipping stage to create warm, saturated mastering effects. It can also help in adding gain to your mixes!

Next we will get into these new plug ins a bit more in depth as they are new. Up is the T-Racks Brickwall Limiter. This is easily one of the most transparent limiters I have heard, BUT it also has a selectable style. Now on clean it can add Gobs and gobs of gain without squashing your sound to death. (magnetic, if you get my drift) The other styles it has are Advanced 1 thru 4, Clip, and Sat 1,2 and 3. Each of these can affect how the limiter works, It can work cleanly or a bit dirtier. Maybe some saturation for that analogue feel. Either way they all sound great but my favorite is the more modern clean setting. Now you usually use this at the end of the chain to prevent any clipping so you can set it to limit the volume to zero or -.05 to make sure there is no clipping. It limits the sound from going over a certain level that can be set by you. It also has attack and release times to precisely set it up to the song your mastering.

The T-Racks Vintage Equalizer EQP-1A is modeled after the famed Pultec EQP-1. Now this EQ is far from accurate. If you want accuracy you should use the T-Racks Equalizer or the T-Racks Linear Phase Equalizer, BUT if you want mojo, thickness, sheen and flavor THIS IS THE EQ TO HAVE! This is the real deal. Easily one of the best things you can add to add color without compressing. You can add a bit of lowend and highs and get a great solid sound on just about any source! Best part even if you dont have any changes to the eq but just have it in the chain it imparts a sonic character to it that sounds sweet and thick but not overly present or hurting the source signal! This EQ, like the T-Racks Equalizer can also be used in both L/R and Mid Side.

The T-Racks Linear Phase Equalizer is as precise as they come. This is the EQ you want when you have surgery to do. This is that precise! Much like the other 2 EQ's that T-Racks has to offer it works in L/R, Mid Side and has 6 bands. Sounds familiar right? Wrong. First of all each of the 6 bands can be configured to work as a high pass, low shelving, peaking, high shelving or low pass, this makes this VERY FLEXIBLE! Linear Phase Equalization in and of it self is a very clean, transparent and precise eq so this is again another go-to to fix, enhance or just try out new things WITHOUT it sounding "EQ'd".

The T-Racks Vintage Compressor Model 670 is a God send. No lie. I have used a few Fairchild 670 compressors before but haven't really liked some of the wierd lowend that has presented itself in some of the mixes. Well this is the best modeled Fairchild I have yet to hear. Now if you haven't heard a Fairchild, well trust me you have. Period. This is the "Holy grail" for compressors. So many people have tried to model this, and many times we have been happy....to an extent. Then along comes IK Multimedia and says "BAM! Here you go Obi, take this and create the best mixes you have ever made!". This works in both L/R and Mid Side. This is my new favorite plug in! It sounds great on just about anything! Now with this plug in we will go in and tackle the Mid Side thing a bit. Now we are only touching base so you understand the basics. With Mid Side (or Lat Vert as it appears on the plug in) you can take the stereo field and compress JUST that and leave the Mid (Middle part of the stereo signal) and compress that separate. So take a drum loop for instance. You can raise the input gain on say the Side and it will make the room and stereo width sound much bigger and wider. now if you crank the Mid you get a more solid sounding kick and snare. This can help you really bring life to mixes! Another great feature about it is you can unlink it and compress the left and right independently and have both sides set a bit different to create interesting mixes!

The T-Racks Opto Compressor isn't modeled after anything really. From what Obi's Intel has gathered it is a "What I would want in the perfect Opto Comp" type of plug in. Basically it's not modeled after any precise piece of gear, but it's modeled after real circuit portions, parts and stages. That is part of the secret that helps make this amazing compressor keep total respect of the incoming signal and gives absolute transparency. It's the purest, most transparent yet musical compressor. Now much like the other plug ins in this bundle, L/R, Mid/Side and linkable. The best way to describe this particular compressor is well you can't really. Its transparent as can be. You don't really hear it, which is a great thing! Perfect for adding some sweetness or less apparent compression. Now just to show you the versatility of these plugs you can crank it for that popular "pumping" effect that some people love but when used at even semi high compression levels it is pretty transparent. It is perfect for just about anything. Vocals were the first thing I tried it on. I had it on the vocal folder in Reaper and it helped glue all the parts together without it being noticed at all!

Now to really get down and dirty I am even going to go in depth on the 10th plug in. Now I know I said in the beginning there were 4 classic modules and 5 new ones. "But Obi that makes 9! How can there be 10!?", listen they packed this thing tight with features! They included a full blown metering suite! Now on most metering software or even mixers there are a few standards: Peak and RMS and on some consoles Phase! Great good for you, but IK Multimedia and T-Racks really wanted to leave a impression! Along with a spectrum meter they included a perceived loudness meter! Not only that but each and every one of these are configurable. For example, the spectum can be adjusted to react slower or faster, the peak can be set and -90 to 0 db for a full view, 60 to 0 db for a zoomed in view or a 50 to +5 db for a very precise view! Even better is even the perceived loudness meter can be set to a specific genre so you can compare to the perceived loudness on average that the particular genre has and gives you a idea of where to head for loudness!

Now I have saved the best thing for last, EVERY one of these can be used INDEPENDENTLY as separate plug ins and on individual tracks! You can add some of that Vintage Compressor Model 670 flavor to your drums, the Linear Phase Equalizer on your acoustic, the Opto Compressor = on those vocals and leave the Metering plug in on the master buss to help you with your levels and spectral balance! This is the best thing you can get for 500! I mean 10 plug ins for 500!? Seriously? Of this quality? Yep. Plus if you don't want the whole suite say you just want the Vintage Compressor Model 670 or the Vintage Equalizer EQP-1A you can purchase each one for $99! I personally recommend getting the budle not only to save money but to have some of the best tools for audio at your fingers! It has been said that today you can spend a few thousand and rival big studios but companies like IK Multimedia is making this more and more of a reality with each release! They have outdone themselves with the newest addition to the T-Racks family with T-Racks 3 Deluxe!
 
Umm sorry for giving my review guys, I think its a good product.
 
Umm sorry for giving my review guys, I think its a good product.
There's nothing wrong with having your opinion. And I admire what you're trying to do with your website (and it looks good too.) And to be fair, I have heard that v3 is indeed noticeably improved over v2.

But I suggest that either you check facts before you publish your reviews, or that you have a editor who knows the business who will do it. The phrase quoted is simply divorced from reality; the number of true professionals who would actually purposely choose any previous version of T-Racks over other choices are few and far between.

This is especially poignant for mastering. In fact, for something that is marketed as "mastering software", it doesn't even *do* most of the functions that mastering is meant to accomplish, let alone do them well. And for the basic processing it does do, the quality of most of the v2 plugs just rarely - if ever - rise to the high bar of audiophiliac expectations set by your average pro mastering engineer.

And, unfortunately, when the second sentence in the review makes such a blatantly dubious declaration, it tends to color one's opinion of the rest of the review as one in which the facts and opinions cannot be trusted, even if they do turn out to be factual or well-grounded.

G.
 
T-Racks has been around for about as long if not longer than a lot of DAW's. It has been synonymous with quality, professionalism and the choice of top pros. Now lets take a step back. IK Multimedia. Creaters of Amplitube, Ampeg SVX and the newest Amplitube Fender. Each one of these have their places in top studios across the world
Really?
I used to use an Amplitude model a fair bit and had no raves about the quality of guitar it produced. I don't even load it up anymore.
There's also a comparison of T racks and UAD? Fairchild on Youtube and sorry but the T Racks sounds like it just boosts the loudness and detracts quality actually from the original sound. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rts4egOBHiU

How about some audio comparisons you could post or link to here. I mean, be good to get a different pov.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry but I stand by every word I said. I do believe it is what I said and just because you don't agree with me doesn't change my thoughts or appreciation for this program.
 
I'm sorry but I stand by every word I said. I do believe it is what I said and just because you don't agree with me doesn't change my thoughts or appreciation for this program.

Well, I was yankin' your chain a little. I think it's fine that you are writing and posting your reviews. But remember, others are going to have an opinion on the product you're reviewing as well as the review itself.

As for me, I find the credibility hard to accept when you write something like, "This is easily one of the most transparent limiters I have heard..." and then I see your age is 21. How many limiters have you become intimate enough with to make such a statement in those few short 21 years? Do you really have that much experience to make an unbiased claim such as that?? I don't think so. So then I have to write off the review, because if I can't believe one part, I can't believe any of it. To me, it just sounds like any other review you would read in a magazine. You know the ones... they hawk up whatever product they're writing about because the manufacturer is also a paying advertiser.

Definitely keep posting your reviews. They will be helpful to someone looking for gear or s/w.
 
Well, I was yankin' your chain a little. I think it's fine that you are writing and posting your reviews. But remember, others are going to have an opinion on the product you're reviewing as well as the review itself.

As for me, I find the credibility hard to accept when you write something like, "This is easily one of the most transparent limiters I have heard..." and then I see your age is 21. How many limiters have you become intimate enough with to make such a statement in those few short 21 years? Do you really have that much experience to make an unbiased claim such as that?? I don't think so. So then I have to write off the review, because if I can't believe one part, I can't believe any of it. To me, it just sounds like any other review you would read in a magazine. You know the ones... they hawk up whatever product they're writing about because the manufacturer is also a paying advertiser.

Definitely keep posting your reviews. They will be helpful to someone looking for gear or s/w.

I can see your point. I understand what your saying but I was just trying to help this community that has helped me.
 
I'm sorry but I stand by every word I said. I do believe it is what I said and just because you don't agree with me doesn't change my thoughts or appreciation for this program.
Like I said, you're entitled to your opinion. And I agre with Chili in that I appreciate your desire to help and to pay back and to educate. It's all very admirable, and I encourage you to keep at it.

But I offer as constructive advice that you not try and pad your opinions with erroneous "facts", because there's always someone out there that's going to call you on it. That's true for *everybody*. I get called to task all the time for my posts and web articles, which is why I try my best to research my "facts" before I use them, and also why when I find out my assumed "facts" are actually wrong, I'll be the first to retract or correct myself before I hit the "Send" button (it's far less embarassing that it is to continue to defend fallacies.) We had one incident where this board corrected Craig Anderton, the editor of EQ magazine, for a fallacy printed in there. Craig asked for the correct explanation, it was provided and he understood the correction. Nobody is immune from mistakes. We're all human.

That's one of the wrinkles of the Internet; everybody thinks their opinion is worth hearing. But only those that can back their opinion up with supportable and sustainable data and the ability to defend their position with more than "that's just what I believe" will survive. It's not a question of whether someone agrees with your personal opinion or not; this board has it's share of happy T-Racks users who share your opinion.

But a statement like "It has been synonymous with quality, professionalism and the choice of top pros" is not an expression of opinion, it is represented as a truth. But it's simply not. That's not my opinion, that's an observation of the real-world reactions of the majority of real professional engineers out there, let alone the "top" engineers.

Nor is it just an opinion that T-Racks is really not mastering software. I'd like to have some one ask you to master their album, and see you use T-Racks to set song order, set track markers, RMS balance the song volumes, set cross-fades, edit reverb tails, edit,save and print the PQ codes list, set blue-book spacing, get ISRC codes, set CD Info data, custom dither to 16-bit, and burn the premaster, which are 90% of the key processes that mastering is all about.

The fact that T-Racks calls itself a "mastering suite" and uses the catchphrase "beyond mastering" is a joke when it's nothing nothing but a collection of EQs and comps and doesn't even address the basics of what mastering actually does. Why is none of that in your review?

G.
 
Last edited:
Like I said, you're entitled to your opinion. Just don't try and pad it with erroneous "facts", because there's always someone out there that's going to call you on it. That's true for *everybody*.

That's one of the wrinkles of the Internet; everybody thinks their opinion is worth hearing. But only those that can back their opinion up with supportable and sustainable data and the ability to defend their position with more than "that's just what I believe" will survive. It's not a question of whether someone agrees with your personal opinion or not; this board has it's share of happy T-Racks users who share your opinion.

But a statement like "It has been synonymous with quality, professionalism and the choice of top pros" is not an expression of opinion, it is represented as a truth. But it's simply not. That's not my opinion, that's an observation of the real-world reactions of the majority of real professional engineers out there, let alone the "top" engineers.

Nor is it just an opinion that T-Racks is really not mastering software. I'd like to have some one ask you to master their album, and see you use T-Racks to set song order, set track markers, RMS balance the song volumes, set cross-fades, edit reverb tails, edit,save and print the PQ codes list, set blue-book spacing, get ISRC codes, set CD Info data, custom dither to 16-bit, and burn the premaster, which are 90% of the key processes that mastering is all about.

The fact that T-Racks calls itself a "mastering suite" and uses the catchphrase "beyond mastering" is a joke when it's nothing nothing but a collection of EQs and comps and doesn't even address the basics of what mastering actually does. Why is none of that in your review?

G.


Becuase none of that is included, but show me a program that offers all of that. There are different tools for different situations and these are just a set of tools. In the right hands they work great and sound great.
 
Becuase none of that is included, but show me a program that offers all of that. There are different tools for different situations and these are just a set of tools. In the right hands they work great and sound great.
Sony's Sound Forge/CD Architect suite or Steinberg's Wavelab package will handle most, if not all, of that, *plus* allow you to incorporate 3rd party plugs such a T-Racks (though they are not technically necessary) just to put the icing on the cake.

You're right, T-Racks is just a set of tools - namely a package of EQ and dynamics plugs - that have as much a right to be called a "mastering suite" that a big piece of blank blueprint paper has being called "CAD software" or a carpenter's hammer being called a "skyscraper maker."

G.
 
There's also a comparison of T racks and UAD? Fairchild on Youtube and sorry but the T Racks sounds like it just boosts the loudness and detracts quality actually from the original sound.
To be fair, many might notice that once vinyl was on the outs, most mastering facilities dumped their FC670's like extremely hot potatoes.

I think the UAD emulation of the 670 is probably one of the greatest digital emulations of an analog piece of gear ever (their Pultec probably at the top of the list). That said, it's just not that great of a compressor. Been there, used that. Very nice piece to be sure (once it warms up for an hour or so). For mastering? There's (much) better. The newer variable-mu type compressors (Manley's Variable Mu, Gyraf's Vari-Mu, etc.) are superior sounding units IMO/E.

Shortly after UAD's version came out, we called it "Child Abuse..." The 670 is the new old black.
 
Back
Top