
gecko zzed
Grumpy Mod
I climb hundreds of mountains and they do not call me Dave the mountain climber - but one goat! just one goat . . .
I'm in for the collaboration challenge.
I'm just asking why rules? Has anyone been offended by the process of the challenge thus far? Does anyone feel they are less productive than they could be verses worry about rules?
Just being the devil's advocate, but why are we messing with the challenges if it is efficient and non-offensive?
Collaboration will mean a commitment to another party, but that is just basic respect, do we have to demarcate it?
Being a latent anarchist, I like your devil's advocacy!!
To go one step further, I wouldn't be too concerned if the challenge process was inefficient (though I'd draw the line at offensive).
But the most important statement for me is your last sentence. Furthermore, I continue to frequent this forum because of the high level of respect shown to contributors. I know that there have been the occasional burst from flame-throwers, but these have been rare, and haven't contaminated the forum itself.
So I'd like to see this forum continue as a place where anybody can contribute without feeling silly, without feeling inadequate, and without being publically humiliated.
Hakea made this observation: "But it does boil down to whether the goal is to attract people who already have a minimum level of skill, or whether you're going to run some kind of nursery on the side too", and from my preceding remarks I conclude that I don't think it needs to boil down to anything, and that it is not necessary to even consider a goal.