Rod Gervais
New member
Hmmm. Money? Exactly. And you, who stands to benefit financially for relaxed environmental regulation, are here arguing against these environmental concerns. Your motives are just too obvious to allow anyone to listen to what you are saying without keeping this in mind.
What a shame you had to make this personal - and be wrong in the process as well......
for example - I just spent the last 5 years working on Adreian's Landing - a 3/4 billion dollar project and we didn't cut down one single tree - in fact we planted them - plus did the environmental clean-up of the site along with the removal of old abandonded buried coal oil tanks in the process (one of which was 30,000 gallons and still filled with coal oil)
Prior to all of that it was a 35 million dollar Hotel Spa which didn't cost a treee - and before that The addition to the Nautilus Museum (which didn't cost a tree) the 15,000 sf movie studio in Waterford and The Bonjovi Recording Studio - which we didn't deforest the land for - BUT - we did clean up and restore a wetlands that feeds one of the last pristine class "A" brooks in the State of CT - and for that one I did the wetlands plantings myself - one plant at a time.........
You don't know me from Adam - so I don't see how you get off making a statement like you just did.
The project I am currently working on is the replacement of a structure destroyed in a fire.
How exactly an I profiting by all of this that you refer to?
I take it you didn't bother to read that nice article - the one that speaks to the indian burning of the lands......... the one written by a green foundation - perhaps you should have - I am certain some of the people here did - and you would probably look better if you were at least acknowledging what it proved instead of attacking me.
I expect you to take a step above the position you were in in that last post.
Respectfully,
Rod