
Zaphod B
Raccoons-Be-Gone, Inc.
Muttley, everyone knows how hard you are to get along with. Don't go trying to play "Mister Nice Guy." 

No it wasn't that quote at all. That quote on its own is fine to a point. It was more as I said earlier that you start by saying you internet experts who learn it in an afternoon and then come across that way yourself. I meant no offense by it. Re read my earlier post.Thanks again! So I guess this is the quote which has upset you:
"There are clear and well documented tonal characteristics of different types of wood. But these are very general guidelines and do not make any one species of wood absolutely superior to any other wood in a given application; especially when referring to an electric guitar played though a medium to high gain amp. "
They are not tonal claims. Most are documented and can be substantiated with acoustic modeling and research. Why one is not used over another in all cases is precisely because they ARE different. Thats the whole point. Alder IS a fine tonewood it has and does make fine solid body instruments. It has also been used for fiddles and other bowed instruments with success along with willow and other similar timbers. One note about timber, you also have to be careful what name you give them. What the American continent call alder, poplar and many others is not the same as elsewhere in the world. Its a good idea to give Latin botanical names if you are being specific. The African, Asian and American mahoganies are classic examples of this. There are also at least three types of cherry used in instrument construction and more varieties of walnut. Again you can see how it is no good to be vague about this.I guess I should have been more clear in what I was saying. I'm more than familiar with the traditional tonewoods and the associated tonal claims. I understand the properties of some wood make it more preferable for certain applications, just not absolutely superior. Your example of balsa being a primary example, even if somehow it provided a unique sound it's much to soft to be viable. However, if one wood was absolutely the best why use anything else? At one point, alder was considered an alternative tone wood.
That is not the case with acoustic guitars and like I said there have been many blind listening tests done on many types of instruments. I've done some myself.Asking people to pick out guitar models on a recording is often impossible much less the wood it was made out of as there are there is so much manipulation of an electric guitars sound. And any extra oomph or snap can be completely eliminated using a single tone control. As far as "being careful" about presenting a challenge, why? I'm not afraid of being wrong. I also don't see why yourself or anybody else whould claim that I am trying to present myself as the be-all-end-all expert on guitar. Just another voice.
The title of the editorial is "Challenge the Norm and Form Your Own Opinion", and that's exactly what I try to encourage people to do. If we sat back and accepted tradition, there would be no innovation.
Muttley, everyone knows how hard you are to get along with. Don't go trying to play "Mister Nice Guy."![]()
Oh, shit, I forgot.Don't try getting round me that way. Last week was my nice guy week.![]()
Oh, shit, I forgot.![]()
'Bout time somebody did!Me and Dick Dastardly will swing by in one of our wacky planes and haul your ass outta trouble!
'Bout time somebody did!![]()
Persistent bugger, aren't ya?Awesome.....
so.....
how's your daughter?
![]()
Persistent bugger, aren't ya?![]()
Hey, I've checked out your site a number of times. Would you consider writing anything on Danelectro (both guitars and pedals)?
Stirring up some shit again, eh Muttley?
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi