Question about the older TASCAM mixers...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rickson Gracie
  • Start date Start date
R

Rickson Gracie

New member
Ok, Im literally about to go pick up a M-308 locally and I just want to make sure a few things. Hopefuly someone will chime in.

Is it true that when I connect mixer such as the M-308 to the TSR-8 that I wouldnt have to switch out plugs when I need to bounce, ping pong or mixdown...etc?

Would it almost be like the 388 but two seperate pieces? thanks.

also is $300 a good deal? this is the auction...

http://cgi.ebay.com/TASCAM-M-308-M3...ryZ23785QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 
Yes you can use it just like a 388 for the most part when you want to bounce down to other tracks.
I am not sure 300.00 is what I would call a good price for that mixer.

Someone can correct me here if I am wrong but that is the older 308 and may use older opamps and may not be quite as clean as a m308b.
Plus unlike the m308b that mixer does not have phantom power.
I am not sure what 308,s are going for thease days but for that kind of money you may be able to find a newer version for the same bucks.
 
Plus that one has a dent on top of the meter bridge. The Seller doesn't mention it in the detail...I think he/she expects you to see it in the pics and if not its yer own fault kind of thing... but I wouldn't buy any gear that looks like it has been dropped or had something dropped upon it...probably the reason why the VU meters don't light. Also, generally its okay if an older piece of equipment is a little scratchy. Its common. Both of my PE-40 equalizers and my MX-80 preamp unit had some pretty scratchy pots, but some deoxit and (neat little trick somebody shared on the Tascam Forum) a shoelace wrapped around the knob to rapidly work the lube/cleaner in...works great. Don't get an older piece of gear with a dent in it just because the pots or faders aren't scratchy. My 2p.
 
Yup, good call from the guys above. There's just too many unanswered questions about the mixer and I take issue with the way the smart ass seller tries to 'sell' you on the mixer's condition. I personally wouldn't touch it for that amount. Maybe for 100 bucks, all inclusive. The one redeeming feature is that it's a local pickup for you. That's always preferable but still....... You don't know if / how many times this particular mixer was shipped and dropped all across the country and how many owners it had. That one probably had a hard life.

-------
 
Hell yeah! Keep forgetting about Ramsa (Panasonic). The WR-8118 from the late 80's was one of the better mixers around. The 10-channel in that auction looks like its little brother (same style), but I'm not familiar with that specific one.

:)
 
Yeah, I'd pass on that 308 too. Seems a bit overpriced for only 8 channels and not in great condition. I just bought a 320B a few months ago that is in very nice condition and looks like it was well taken care of. Paid $650 for it which I think is a bit much also but because of the condition I felt it was worth it. I think I made a great choice now that I've been using it. Really like this mixer alot. But with anything this old it will need maintenance. I will be starting to re-cap this board real soon. Haven't been able to dig up any info on how this board performs after a re-cap but I have a great feeling about it.
 
The WR-8118 from the late 80's was one of the better mixers around.

That's one hell of a nice mixer!

Tim, any other suggestions for mixers, other than TASCAM / TEAC, specific models I mean?

------
 

Attachments

  • guitarplayermay19830022.webp
    guitarplayermay19830022.webp
    41.7 KB · Views: 150
I've always liked Studiomaster and the early Mackie's. In fact, my list was down to the Tascam M-216 and a similar Studiomaster back around 1990 when I was looking for a smaller console for all my MIDI modules. I went with the Tascam, and the rest is history... I still have it and it's never given me a bit of trouble... still like-new. :)
 
would that ramsa mixer work well with the TSR-8? as well as the TASCAM? thanks

edit: what i mean is would i have to do a lot of cable swapping?
 
Last edited:
I wish I could say for sure. It looks similar to (but not exactly like) a small version of the larger WR-81xx types from the same era. Unfortunately the pics in the listing are small and the seller failed to provide even the most basic features in the description. I hate when that happens. :mad:

My guess would be it’s a nice little mixer, but I have no idea what Ramsa designed it for. Getting some details from the seller would be the best bet, if possible before auction end.

My gut says it likely has dedicated tape inputs, and is probably a 10x4x2 with buss faders 1 & 2 doing double duty as Left/Right out for mixdown. But that guess is based on a lot of squinting at the small pictures and comparing to the larger Ramsa I’m familiar with. I could be mistaken.

Here’s a similar model, WR-8210 from the early 80’s that I know was made for recording because I have an ad for it in a 1982 Issue of International Musician and Recording World magazine. :cool:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150234043580

:)
 
Last edited:
..... and the early Mackie's.

Tim, from another thread I quote you:

original Mackie CR-1604 (1990) is another fav.

manufacturers really started cutting corners in the 90’s and after the outsource-to-China approach caught on it was all over.

What are your thoughts on the quality of the other, later Mackies, like the VLZ and VLZ PRO series of the same 1604 model? In other words, is it paramount, if one is looking for quality Mackie, to actually look if that particular model was "Made in the USA"? I know the current models are made in china though... which pretty much says it all.

Thanks.:)

-----
 
The only thing I would watch out for one mackie mixers like the 16o4 is they are not a inline mixer that is realy made for recording. It does have direct outs on the first 8 channels though. And alot of people dont really care about their eq. Thats why they redesigned the new models and went with british eq.
I had their 24 channel 8 buss mixer and it was ok but put that eq with a alesis adat and oh man the cats in the neiborhood will leave town.
 
new Mackie Onyx mixers are pretty damn tight. I think they would compare quite favorably to a 20+ year old Tascam/TEAC/Panasonic/Ramsa whatever mixer. Onyx series is a notch or two above the old VLZs. I'm not 100% sure, but they are prolly made in China...
 
The only thing I would watch out for one mackie mixers like the 16o4 is they are not a inline mixer that is realy made for recording

I should add that this is also kinda the case with the onyx series as well. that, and the EQ/insert is not in the recording send. There is a mod to get it set up that way (which I am gonna eventually have done on mine). plus the Onyx stuff is prolly 2 or 3 times as much as you pay for some of the other mixers mentioned in this thread. EQ and preamps are really nice, nice monitoring capabilities, 4 aux channels, built like a tank, FW option, 4 stereo channels (which I use as playback monitoring). If you can't tell,I'm a big fan of the Onyx line!
 
Tim, from another thread I quote you:

original Mackie CR-1604 (1990) is another fav.

manufacturers really started cutting corners in the 90’s and after the outsource-to-China approach caught on it was all over.

What are your thoughts on the quality of the other, later Mackies, like the VLZ and VLZ PRO series of the same 1604 model? In other words, is it paramount, if one is looking for quality Mackie, to actually look if that particular model was "Made in the USA"? I know the current models are made in china though... which pretty much says it all.

Thanks.:)


-----

My church had a VLZ for years and it seemed ok other than loosing a couple channels. I don't know if the model we had was made in USA or not. I really liked the first Mackie's though.

I have a problem in general with the Asia outsource model on principle and quality issues. There are exceptions of course, but only on the quality aspect… Taiwan is generally a better bet than China, Malaysia or Indonesia and Taiwan doesn’t treat her people like dogs.

IMO, It’s harder to find exceptions on the moral issue, which in effect is demonstrating that our way of life isn’t viable without slavery. The United States is both importing what I consider slave labor across our southern border and outsourcing labor to countries like China, which abuse their citizens (well you can’t really call them citizens… they are subjects.) It’s hard to wave a flag for freedom and democracy when the way we are maintaining our own way of life is by exploiting oppressed peoples somewhere else.

Nearly every developed country is outsourcing to China. I feel greed has fostered a new slave trade. China’s industry isn’t very refined as far as energy consumption either. The growing industries in China are part of the reason we’re paying these ungodly prices at the pump. Whatever little we save at Wal-Mart, we lose it all and more when filling up our cars and paying our power bills.

Back to the practical quality issues, one of the reasons I buy vintage stuff is that manufactures didn’t have a throwaway mentality in the early days of personal studio development (late 70’s to early 90’s). Things just don’t seem to last much past the warranty these days without some sort of failure. Also, companies were competing for cost and quality, not just cost. Outsourcing is just one way manufacturers are cutting corners.

It’s impossible to live these days without buying Chinese made stuff, but recording is one area I have some control, so I buy mostly vintage equipment made in the country the company started in. In my experience it has the sound I'm looking for and lasts longer.

Alesis, Lexicon, Mackie and dbx from USA
Yamaha, Tascam, Fostex and Roland from Japan
Yorkville from Canada
Behringer from Germany
Etc.

I don’t have much gear made past the mid 90’s (except my PC). And even newer stuff like my Echo Layla was made in USA and my Fostex CR300 CD recorder (2001) was made in Japan.

It works for me.
:)
 
Behringer is made in china/taiwan, "engineered" in Germany.
But even PRS is "licensing" some of it's guitars to be made in Korea. I hate to sound alarmist but unless you're willing to fork over good $$$ for vintage or older stuff (no matter what-music gear, cars, etc.) cheap Asian labour and manufacturing are here to stay. Not taking sides, there's some plusses, maybe more minuses...just sayin'...
 
You guys make some good points. Well then, what do we do now??:confused::eek::confused::eek::confused:

------
 
Back
Top