Trump on Trial!

Megyn Kelly talking about how full of crap Stormy Daniels is and what a farce the trial is. They get into it pretty quickly at the start of the video - the point is also made that what she has to say has nothing to do with what the charges are, it's just salacious noise.


 
Missionary position...? At his age? With that belly!?
I'm calling Bull$hit!
What's the point of screwing a porn star if you're not gonna' get a professional blowjob!?

I WANT A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF DONALD TRUMP'S DICK!
 
Last edited:
Dave Matthews said:
To establish the credibility of the alleged facts.
Click to expand...
Well if she was paid hush money, she’s not doing a good job of keeping ‘hush’. She should give the money back.

She already lost the civil defamation lawsuit and refuses to pay what she was ordered to.

So I don’t see a high level of credibility there.

Now maybe Trump banged her, maybe he didn’t. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. No one invited me for a three way.

from what I’ve seen it’s really a he said/she said type of situation.

But regarding the alleged crimes her testimony serves no purpose other than to paint Trump in a bad as possible light.
 
RFR said:
Well if she was paid hush money, she’s not doing a good job of keeping ‘hush’. She should give the money back.

She already lost the civil defamation lawsuit and refuses to pay what she was ordered to.

So I don’t see a high level of credibility there.

Now maybe Trump banged her, maybe he didn’t. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. No one invited me for a three way.

from what I’ve seen it’s really a he said/she said type of situation.

But regarding the alleged crimes her testimony serves no purpose other than to paint Trump in a bad as possible light.
Click to expand...
Well neither one of us is a lawyer, but as a layman I don't see how you can establish the facts without the witnesses in the case, ie Pecker, Daniels, McDougall, Cohen, etc.
 
leddy said:
Trump admits payment to Daniels. If it wasn’t for sex, what was it for?

Trump refused to provide a dna sample for 3 years to Carroll’s team of lawyers.
Click to expand...
Cite the New York law that says payment for an NDA is required to be reported as a legal expense.

leddy said:
If he never met her as he said, why would he fear his dna being on her dress?
Click to expand...
You mean the Donna Karan dress she claimed she was wearing that didn't exist at the time of the alleged encounter? Lol. :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
RFR said:
Well if she was paid hush money, she’s not doing a good job of keeping ‘hush’. She should give the money back.

She already lost the civil defamation lawsuit and refuses to pay what she was ordered to.

So I don’t see a high level of credibility there.

Now maybe Trump banged her, maybe he didn’t. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. No one invited me for a three way.

from what I’ve seen it’s really a he said/she said type of situation.

But regarding the alleged crimes her testimony serves no purpose other than to paint Trump in a bad as possible light.
Click to expand...
It's a he said/she keeps changing her story situation.
 
RFR said:
Well if she was paid hush money, she’s not doing a good job of keeping ‘hush’. She should give the money back.
Click to expand...
Yup.
RFR said:
She already lost the civil defamation lawsuit and refuses to pay what she was ordered to.
Click to expand...
Contempt of court?
RFR said:
So I don’t see a high level of credibility there.
Click to expand...
I trust my hoes. You know what -- I heard a story once, friend of a friend got an escort who was drunk as a skunk. So drunk that he was able to take his money back before leaving.
RFR said:
Now maybe Trump banged her, maybe he didn’t. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. No one invited me for a three way.
Click to expand...
Again--not a crime.
RFR said:
from what I’ve seen it’s really a he said/she said type of situation.
Click to expand...
She didn't mention any rape etc in her pornhub commentary. So it isn't he said / she said. Should be a cinch if they can trace the money (can they?).
RFR said:
But regarding the alleged crimes her testimony serves no purpose other than to paint Trump in a bad as possible light.
Click to expand...
Exactly.
 
brassplyer said:
It's a he said/she keeps changing her story situation.
Click to expand...
Trump and Biden are both quite capable of painting themselves in a bad light within the court of public opinion. Bad light aside, one of 'em is gonna be elected for a second term as POTUS by that same court.

Voters will decide their fates on Nov 5, 2024

And that's the way it should be.
 
Dave Matthews said:
You guys are concentrating on the wrong (salacious) crap.
It's not about the sex, it's about the cheques.
Click to expand...
Hmm? I think that's your side's idea, right? to keep the jury brooding over Trump having an oranger cock than they do?
Serendipity Records said:
She didn't mention any rape etc in her pornhub commentary. So it isn't he said / she said. Should be a cinch if they can trace the money (can they?).
Click to expand...
 
Serendipity Records said:
I trust my hoes. You know what -- I heard a story once, friend of a friend got an escort who was drunk as a skunk. So drunk that he was able to take his money back before leaving.
Click to expand...
Hmmmmm? Trump pays Stormy $130,000 (hush money) years after their hotel one night stand. The American people deserve to be told how much Trump paid her on the night of that one night stand....amirite?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top