rayc
retroreprobate
It's just something I grew up with - putting logos on fakes that is.
My family was almost dirt poor, (we did have wooden floors though), for some of my childhood & I remember asking my mum to sew a little Levi tag I'd found onto an old old no name denim jacket I had.
She did as asked EXCEPT she used good old scout badge blanket stitching so my quest for unwarranted status was undermined in the cruelst possible way and that taught me a lesson.
The 1st guitar I bought, (a Bruno Royal Artist semi acoustic in 1978), had had the Royal Artist badge removed from the headstock & a fairly good version of a Gibson logo painted on in its stead.
I knew it was bogus because, (as did, I'm sure, the pawn shop dealer though he wasn't letting on), I had a fair idea of Gibson gear and the Made in Japan stamp on the neck bolt plate was a pretty good piece of evidence. I managed to wrangle the guitar for $70 as an imposter, got it home & removed the faux Gibson. It's just one of things with me. A thing is what the thing is.
The amp maker has a good name but it's not Marshall.
There's some irony & non irony in paying for and wearing garments that have the most significant design item as a name, logo or reference to a brand. There's intent, sad &/or fun, in wearing a T shirt that advocates a brand of something or a band, (well a band is a brand). I know MM wouldn't try to flog off the amp as a Marshall & would tell any one that asked it wasn't one which starts the merry go round again.
I know, I'm old & I act it!
My family was almost dirt poor, (we did have wooden floors though), for some of my childhood & I remember asking my mum to sew a little Levi tag I'd found onto an old old no name denim jacket I had.
She did as asked EXCEPT she used good old scout badge blanket stitching so my quest for unwarranted status was undermined in the cruelst possible way and that taught me a lesson.
The 1st guitar I bought, (a Bruno Royal Artist semi acoustic in 1978), had had the Royal Artist badge removed from the headstock & a fairly good version of a Gibson logo painted on in its stead.
I knew it was bogus because, (as did, I'm sure, the pawn shop dealer though he wasn't letting on), I had a fair idea of Gibson gear and the Made in Japan stamp on the neck bolt plate was a pretty good piece of evidence. I managed to wrangle the guitar for $70 as an imposter, got it home & removed the faux Gibson. It's just one of things with me. A thing is what the thing is.
The amp maker has a good name but it's not Marshall.
There's some irony & non irony in paying for and wearing garments that have the most significant design item as a name, logo or reference to a brand. There's intent, sad &/or fun, in wearing a T shirt that advocates a brand of something or a band, (well a band is a brand). I know MM wouldn't try to flog off the amp as a Marshall & would tell any one that asked it wasn't one which starts the merry go round again.
I know, I'm old & I act it!