The Results Are In...............
............and you ALL suck!!!
Before I post - here's the preamble.......
I expanded the scoring range from 1-5 to 1-10 instead...... and I added another category - OVERALL MIX IMPACT - mainly because there were certain songs that sounded good sonically, but lacked punch, and vice-versa.....
As before, the scope of the ratings are within the group of mixes themselves. I wasn't comparing each mix to a commercial reference one at a time. This means all the scores are more or less relative to each other across mixes and it should be clearly audible why a mix scored low compared to another.
And again, I did the scoring "blind" - the entrant's names were only put into the chart after I entered all the scores, so I never knew who I was scoring at the time I was listening. (I put all the entries onto 2 CDs - so while I was listening, I only had track numbers as a reference, not names)
Also, one more change from the last time -- I level-adjusted each mix for roughly the same SPL before they went to CD, meaning those who used limiting as a means to get a very hot mix wasted their efforts (except to lop off dynamics!)
So, without further ado...... the results will follow... congratulations to the winner, and A for effort to everyone for participating!
PS - Finster -- I noticed some serious flanging on the drum OHs on nearly everyone's mixes - I take it that was on the original tracks?? (If not -- then everyone needs to deduct an additional 4 points!!!
)