
diggy_dude
Now 169% diggier!
Yamaha SPX-50D
Would you pay $70 for one or spend an extra $50 for an SPX-90?
Would you pay $70 for one or spend an extra $50 for an SPX-90?
Last edited:
And if you google up the SPD50D it just comes up this this thread!And another one in Japanese.
I think he meant SPX-50D
The $120 includes shipping, by the way. The asking price is more like $75 to $80.
Wanna part with one of your 90s and save a poor boy some change?![]()
I already bought an SPX-90. (Did I spell the model number correctly this time?) Pro Sound Web wasn't particularly pleased with the M350. The Yamaha unit is a well-loved piece of vintage kit.
Listen, Henry. Does a houseful of Casiotone keyboards and a vocoder sound like a guy who's shooting for the aural equivalent of photorealism? Miking drums and tweaking Marshall stacks in search of some elusive "tone" would bore me to tears. I think the ancient 16-bit processor will fit what I'm doing quite nicely.![]()
Casio? Don't they make watches
Yes Diggy. One could equate that as photorealism as long as you don't try and cross over into trompe l'oeil territory. For I don't think that 16-bit processors can tromper l'oreille that easily.
My sound will tromper in the same sense that the Aeon Flux movie did. I want that cartoonish semi-realistic style.
The difference between the SPX-50D & the SPX-90 & 90II,...
Is the fact that there are distortion sounds mixed with reverb, delay, etc
The SPX-50D is a very underrated effects unit, IMO...it is better than the 90.
If you learn your way around it, just like anything else,...it is a good tool / piece of gear.
Which one has the distorted sounds?
What makes the 50D better, in your opinion?