
Chris F
New member
I keep seeing all kinds of gear ads for expensive "Channel strips" which usually include EQ and compression as well as a pre. While I'm no expert on recording matters (to say the least), I have done a fair amount of studio work, and in my experience in that capacity the engineer who gets the best results almost never uses compression or EQ while tracking. He says that it would be a shame to process a signal on the way in, since you're stuck with the changes once it's recorded, and adds that it's almost always better to just keep working at mic placement and tone production before recording to get what you're looking for naturally, then tweak as needed to make the sound sit in the mix the way you want.
This makes perfect sense to me, and after working with this guy over the past couple of years I can't see why I'd want to do it any other way. If this is the case (and I'm sure there's room for argument, but...), wouldn't the compression and EQ on most channel strips be kind of superfluous? Enlighten me, oh wise ones!
This makes perfect sense to me, and after working with this guy over the past couple of years I can't see why I'd want to do it any other way. If this is the case (and I'm sure there's room for argument, but...), wouldn't the compression and EQ on most channel strips be kind of superfluous? Enlighten me, oh wise ones!