Which Radio Shack SPL meter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notCardio
  • Start date Start date
N

notCardio

I walk the line
Does anyone know if one of the Radio Shack SPL meters is more accurate than the other, or if the only difference is in the display? (one's digital, the other has an analog VU meter) Or does anyone have any other suggestions?

Thanks
 
I have the analog meter movement type I'm happy as a clam with it. The model # is 33-2050.
 
Ditto here.

And, as Track Rat knows, you can perform modifications to the 33-2050 to improve performance.
 
Hey guys, got that one too, along with an older version I got at goodwill - what mods are you referring to, and where can I check 'em out? Thanx in advance... Steve
 
what a coincidence! My father came from the States yesterday and he brought me the digital model.
But I don't get itmuch. I don't know if it shows RMS or PEAK. I know it has a MAX button that shows a few more dbs, but I don't if it's another way of calling those two concepts.

Does somebody know? TIA, Andrés
 
Does anyone know if the digital model is as accurate as the analog?
 
Cordura21,

I believe that the MAX feature allows you to see the maximum level that the sound reached during your measurement period. A little more useful for industrial applications.

In other words, if this were temperature you were measuring, 'normal' mode would tell you how hot it is right now, and 'MAX' mode would tell you the highest temperature reached while you were measuring.

And thanks for the responses, guys.
 
thanks Cardiopotent. I'm gonna read the manual again, if it can't do RMS then I'll be pretty dissapointed.

It has a feature where you tell it to sample an x amount of seconds, and after that it will tell you the max, the min and the... well... the not max or min that I don't know what the hell is.

It also has a sensitivity button, but I guess it just changes the number of samples per time unit.
 
Can't comment on the digital as I have the cheaper analot. But, damn I love your avatar. :cool:
 
thanks Cardiopotent. I'm gonna read the manual again, if it can't do RMS then I'll be pretty dissapointed.

It has a feature where you tell it to sample an x amount of seconds, and after that it will tell you the max, the min and the... well... the not max or min that I don't know what the hell is.

Root Means Square only refers to measurements of power and not actual sound. So you will never see dB with an RMS rating next to it. Unless its a cheap POS japaneze gear that is only for impressing car stereo kids that dont know any better.
 
darrin_h2000 said:
... Root Means Square only refers to measurements of power and not actual sound. So you will never see dB with an RMS rating next to it. Unless its a cheap POS japaneze gear that is only for impressing car stereo kids that dont know any better.

Well, you're sort of headed in the right direction, but that's not right. In fact, it's pretty normal to take a RMS measurement, then describe it in decibels.

RMS does not refer to measurements of power, but to measurements of something like voltage or sound pressure level. The whole reason you need to do a root-mean-square calculation (instead of just a mean, or "average") is because you want to express a varying measurement of something other than power in terms of the constant measurement that would produce the same power -- or, to put it another way, that will do the same amount of work over a set period of time.

Say you've got a series of voltages: 1, 1, 2, 8, 2, 1. The mean is 2.5. But voltage is related to power by a square function. The mean power is something like 1 + 1 + 4 + 64 + 4 + 1 / 6 = 12.5 (if 1 volt produces 1 watt in the particular circuit). The square of 2.5 is only 6.25; 2.5 constant volts produces only half the power (and, over the same amount of time, does only half the work) of the sequence of voltages listed above.

A more meaningful way of describing the effect of a sequence of voltages that changes over time is RMS: you square each value, figure the mean of the squares, then take the square root of that. The RMS of the series of voltages above is the square root of 12.5 = 3.54 (approximately). This series of voltages will produce the same amount of power (and do the same amount of work per unit of time) as a constant 3.54 volts. This is a much more useful thing to know than that the mean voltage is 2.5 volts.

The assertion that "you will never see dB with an RMS rating next to it" kind of makes sense, though it's not right, and you've got it backwards. It isn't because "RMS only refers to power" ... indeed, dB (strictly speaking) is a power measurement, and RMS doesn't refer to power, but a changing value of pressure or voltage, expressed in terms of the constant value of pressure or voltage that would produce the same power (or do the same work per unit time).

Electrical power varies with the square of voltage.
Similarly, the power of sound varies with the square of sound pressure.
This makes sense if you think of voltage as akin to pressure: the "push" that makes current flow.

That's why, when you use a dB scale to describe relative voltage or relative SPL levels, the formula is
20 * log10(measurement/reference).

Bottom line: you can certainly take a varying voltage (or SPL), describe the RMS of that varying voltage, and then relate that value to a reference value with a logarithmic decibel scale. In fact, it's the natural thing to do.
 
Hard to imagine all this information from a simple question that I believee has not been answered.
 
Back
Top