what hifi-vcr to buy

  • Thread starter Thread starter cluster0ne
  • Start date Start date
C

cluster0ne

New member
As poor as I am,I cannot afford a DAT so my next bet for mixing down and mastering would be HiFi-Video.But what models are good for audio recording...?
 
Why do people keep talking about mastering to VHS? We used to do that in the 80's but wouldnt Minidisc or even regular casette be better nowadays? I cant remember the last time I played a VHS tape and thought "Now that is some sweet sound."
 
I think VHS is actually much better sounding than Cassette and Minidisc....

Although I might be wrong... but thats my mileage..


What puzzles me is, with the money this guy is spending to get the VCR, he could get a cheap stand alone cdr burner....


I've seen 'em around up here (canada) for $459.... So im sure you could get one in the states for $299

Joe
 
Cassette uses 1/8" tape, and Minidisks use a compressed storage format. Hi-fi VHS uses the hifi heads on the video head drum for printing and reading 1/2" tape much like a dat player does. Although the entire width of the tape is not used for audio, if you use a good quality SVHS tape your using a LOT more particles than cassette. Therefore, of the 3 it's probably not a bad choice for mastering. Although I agree with VOXVENDOR; For what you will spend to get a quality HIFI VHS deck you could easily afford a stand alone burner. Just my $.02.
:p
 
Last edited:
The HiFi VCR route can be very useful.

There's just a whole lot of tape (width AND length) on a VHS tape vs. a cassette.

Stay away from the SONY SLV-N51. While a decent VCR for $100
and it does have RCA HiFi audio outs, and the rewind is rocking and rolling (full VHS tape in less than 60 seconds) they ARE NOT HiFi by a Long Shot.
My last SONY VCR WAS really HiFi but cost me nearly $400.
Unfortunately it died an early death, freash out of warranty, as if they had a freekin' timer built into it. Time to buy it again. NOT!!!

> I cant remember the last time I played a VHS tape and thought "Now that is some sweet sound."

The $400 SONY I mentioned made me feel that way. Really low noise floor. Great detail and frequency response.

Of course I'm using my SONY receiver as a "standard". If the source material is noticeably noisy through this receiver, then I have to blame the source. If not, I can't tell you how much better than the receiver the source is.

Other stuff I've run through the SONY:

CDRW-5000 burner. Cleaner than the receiver.
GINA analog outs: Cleaner than the receiver.
TASCAM Porta-07 and 424 portastudios. Not as clean as the receiver.
SONY hifi stereo VCR: As clean as the receiver.
 
currently I own MD4s that I was thinking to mixdown the tracks from Tascam 238 syncaset 8-track machine(maybe i'll buy adat in the next 5 years).I kind of like how the MD sounds,I've bought it to record some ideas at home,I upgraded from tascam 244 witch i really enjoyed,but it feels so damn easy to edit on the MD.I don't want to go the easy way.I wan't my equipment to fight back a little(to work little harder to archieve my goals,'cause in the end it feels much more satisfying).I don't need or want any computer based system,I don't trust computers that much..
I think the vcr is good enough fo me
sorry,little tired...zzz...
 
Hey,whatever works in a pinch!I did a vcr session recently cause the drummer didn't want to cart his gear to my house.I used 4 hi fi VCRs and dumped the tracks to pc for mixing.I posted a clip.Everything synced up,which kinda surprised me.Of the 4 machines,3 were different brands,so that doesn't seem to matter.
Tom
 
Back
Top