
Myriad_Rocker
New member
Okay, so I'm doing my very first full blown large scale project. It just happens to be with my own band. We have recorded drums, bass, and guitars. Everything sounds good. Our first vocal recording session was Saturday. I have three vocal mics to choose so we go through the paces of trying out each one.
First up was the SM7b. Sounded good...not mind blowing, but good. There was something odd about it, though. Next up, the Rode NTK. Now, this mic seems to have a bad rep. We let this mic warm up while we were testing the SM7 since the NTK is tube. We threw it up and and got to work. Immediately, I noticed this odd upper mid range about it that didn't sit well with me for some reason. It sounded hyped or just strange. And it also shared something in common with the SM7b...there was that same "odd" thing about it. The next mic up was an AT4033. I think of this mic as the cheapest vocal mic I have. And probably one that you wouldn't want to use for the lead vocals on a rock album. We got to work with this one and the sound of the mic just seemed to sit better in the mix. That upper mid thing was gone. And that "odd" thing was gone.
And I realized what that "odd" thing was on the SM7 and NTK. The vocals SOUNDED like they were recorded separately, if that makes sense. They just stuck out. It sounded like he was singing over a CD...kareokee or however you spell it. The 4033 didn't have that. In just waltzed in and sat down right in the middle of the mix.
So...here's the deal. I don't know WHY, but it bothers me that the cheapest mic in my vocal mic closet was the chosen mic here. I can come to terms more about it beating out the NTK than I can with it seemingly beating out the SM7. The SM7 is a staple! I also can't help but wonder what other mics are out there that mic sound better than the 4033. It did sit better in the mix, but I didn't hear any "magic" with it, if that makes sense.
Was it an EQ thing on the SM7 and NTK? Could I have made it better? I can't help but wonder if I was missing some of the magic on the SM7 and/or NTK...more so on the SM7. And what was with them sounding like they were being used "outside" of the mix? The SM7 and NTK just sounded like they were being recorded separately.
Anyway, just looking for some advice. Sorry about the long post. Should I snag a TLM103? Or perhaps a Soundelux U195? Or maybe a Puelso? Or should I think about picking up an AT4050 or 4060? Would it be worth it? I don't have all kinds of money. If I had deep pockets, I would just buy everything I could. And I also have no choice but to buy used.
By the way, I was running through a Great River pre.
First up was the SM7b. Sounded good...not mind blowing, but good. There was something odd about it, though. Next up, the Rode NTK. Now, this mic seems to have a bad rep. We let this mic warm up while we were testing the SM7 since the NTK is tube. We threw it up and and got to work. Immediately, I noticed this odd upper mid range about it that didn't sit well with me for some reason. It sounded hyped or just strange. And it also shared something in common with the SM7b...there was that same "odd" thing about it. The next mic up was an AT4033. I think of this mic as the cheapest vocal mic I have. And probably one that you wouldn't want to use for the lead vocals on a rock album. We got to work with this one and the sound of the mic just seemed to sit better in the mix. That upper mid thing was gone. And that "odd" thing was gone.
And I realized what that "odd" thing was on the SM7 and NTK. The vocals SOUNDED like they were recorded separately, if that makes sense. They just stuck out. It sounded like he was singing over a CD...kareokee or however you spell it. The 4033 didn't have that. In just waltzed in and sat down right in the middle of the mix.
So...here's the deal. I don't know WHY, but it bothers me that the cheapest mic in my vocal mic closet was the chosen mic here. I can come to terms more about it beating out the NTK than I can with it seemingly beating out the SM7. The SM7 is a staple! I also can't help but wonder what other mics are out there that mic sound better than the 4033. It did sit better in the mix, but I didn't hear any "magic" with it, if that makes sense.
Was it an EQ thing on the SM7 and NTK? Could I have made it better? I can't help but wonder if I was missing some of the magic on the SM7 and/or NTK...more so on the SM7. And what was with them sounding like they were being used "outside" of the mix? The SM7 and NTK just sounded like they were being recorded separately.
Anyway, just looking for some advice. Sorry about the long post. Should I snag a TLM103? Or perhaps a Soundelux U195? Or maybe a Puelso? Or should I think about picking up an AT4050 or 4060? Would it be worth it? I don't have all kinds of money. If I had deep pockets, I would just buy everything I could. And I also have no choice but to buy used.
By the way, I was running through a Great River pre.