Umm, excuse me? Automatic Mastering? ...What?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elbandito
  • Start date Start date
PRHunt said:
Jimmy, the blank page came from a mal-formed link. Here's the download: http://www.curioza.com/AAMS.zip

Come on, you know you want to!
Click to expand...

I did find it, and now I am am a member of the pyramid scheme that will make you all believers. First you need to transfer $20,000 US to my account in Africa. Then you will be bestowed great powers of fur-tility and suck-tual prowess.

PM me if you think this isn't real. Would I make this crap up? Seriously?

Send me some cash now!

PO BOX; yeah, whatever. :)
 
When windows is giving a compatibility error or informs the AAMS program can't be run;
Follow the steps below.
For certain versions of Windows Vista or Windows 7 ;

1. Download AAMS Installer.
2. Rightclick on installer and select properties.
3. Select Windows 95 compatible modus.
4. Install AAMS.
5. Goto AAMS directory , C:\program files\AAMS
6. Rightclick on AAMS.exe, and select properties.
7. Select Windows 95 compatible modus.
8. Runs AAMS.
Click to expand...

It's so cutting edge it's too advanced for the latest operating systems. :O
 
Whatever man. Enough with your bringing down of software that will obviously make you and your 'forum' community obsolete!

Give me your money, and I will prove that you all are stupid, ignorant pthsgfdhgjkeu!


LOL!

:D
 
Luddite!!

jimmys69 said:
Wonder if the asshole has made any money yet? Sure we will see the poor sods here soon, if he did. What a prick....
Click to expand...

I must say, that I've lost a lot of respect for this forum, if it attracts rude and ignorant morons :mad:

How the hell can anyone call someone an 'asshole' and a 'prick' for creating a piece of software, as a further music production tool? Especially if they haven't even tried it out!!? Still I guess there will always be morons about, who are keen enough to belittle others who are trying to be creative in their own way. :cursing:

And guess what - I'm actually going to try out the software (even though I consider myself quite proficient at mastering - after 30 or so years) - and if it's not for me - then so be it - but I won't start insulting those who probably spent a long time, with a lot of passion and enthusiasm developing the product. However, if I find it of any use to me (and that could be possible, as from what I've seen it has an extensive array of manual options) then I will happily purchase it. :)

I think a few of you need a reality check - and to get a life!! :p
 
I have mentioned it before, taste and clicks, bad edits and general QC are not concepts "automastering" will comprehend.
It is like a robot that does 50pct of the job and probably not very well.

SafeandSound
CD Mastering studio
 
I must say, that I've lost a lot of respect for this forum, if it attracts rude and ignorant morons

How the hell can anyone call someone an 'asshole' and a 'prick' for creating a piece of software, as a further music production tool? Especially if they haven't even tried it out!!? Still I guess there will always be morons about, who are keen enough to belittle others who are trying to be creative in their own way.

And guess what - I'm actually going to try out the software (even though I consider myself quite proficient at mastering - after 30 or so years) - and if it's not for me - then so be it - but I won't start insulting those who probably spent a long time, with a lot of passion and enthusiasm developing the product. However, if I find it of any use to me (and that could be possible, as from what I've seen it has an extensive array of manual options) then I will happily purchase it.

I think a few of you need a reality check - and to get a life!!
Click to expand...

First and only post. Hey guys, meet the developer. :P
 
I still want to give the software a run. Trial version link goes to a 404. Go figure....

Downloaded the software, and giving it a run now. Everything gets a fair shot right? :)
 
Well, I wish I had some support from the developer. It actually don't sound too bad. A bit over compressed, but I would expect an asshole to do that. As all assholes should. lol!

Just kidding. Don't get all offended.

@ amu;

I would like to hear more from you, if you are the developer, and willing to speak about your product. Strangely enough, it does seem to have some potential. Obviously, much time has been spent on production of the software. I'm not so sure that it is possible to master anything automatically, though I bet you sell this to those who have not the knowledge, or experience themselves.

If you are not the developer, then well, you just got razzed by those of us that scoff at 'instant' anything. Consider yourself 'razzed'. :)

Topic/software open for discussion.
 
Even surgery can be automated now. Why not mastering? But I think the AAMS concept is just plain wrong from the beginning. Matching the spectral energy of a hit can't transform a turd into gold.
Here's the list of serious questions AAMS can't get the right answer, because none exists:
- What is the correct time window to get a relevant spectral imprint? second, minute, track or the whole album?
- Is a spectral imprint a correct data to match, since two different tracks can produce the same results?
- What happen if tracks have different pitches?
In my opinion, only sister tracks must be used for both imprint, and track to be processed. Same music genre, tonality and tempo are required to expected to obtain a possible correct result using this method.
 
Yeah, I have already wasted to much time wondering, wishing, attempting, and writing this very sentence.

Master that! :)
 
It takes all the fun and creativity out of it! Slam! Bam! Done! Not for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top