cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
Mark7 said:
Cool! Never seen those before!
The first looks a direct copy of the TASCAM 234. Still pretty cool clone!
The second one looks a monster of a cassette portastudio! 45 lbs!!
GIMMIE!
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
Except with the XLR's and 1/4" Access-Snd/Rcv,...
the back panel looks more on par with the 388!
I must admit, I've seen the Audio Technica model before, in person. Nice!
Both of these models are Dolby B/C NR versions of what's otherwise IMO Tascam clones. The A/T one-ups the Tascam 246 by including XLR inputs, which appears to have borrowed the entire rear panel design of the 388. Feature-wise, this thing's loaded!
Anyway,... nothing screams hifi-audio like wood side panels!
the back panel looks more on par with the 388!
I must admit, I've seen the Audio Technica model before, in person. Nice!
Both of these models are Dolby B/C NR versions of what's otherwise IMO Tascam clones. The A/T one-ups the Tascam 246 by including XLR inputs, which appears to have borrowed the entire rear panel design of the 388. Feature-wise, this thing's loaded!
Anyway,... nothing screams hifi-audio like wood side panels!
Attachments
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
Yeah, if the 246 had xlr's it'd be, imho, a perfect cassette 4 track.
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
I'm sure the Audio Technica was a very well built machine. Certainly looks it.
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
Well, you have the Audio-Technica 6x4 as an alternative.
Local Pickup Only! Be there, or be square!
Local Pickup Only! Be there, or be square!
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
It has the build quality of the M-30!
45 pounds,... baby!
Come to think of it, (I'm remembering now), it's about the same size as the M-30!
A/T: L-21"/ W-24"/ D-5" (weight 45lbs). Metal top-plate/metal construction.
Yeah, that A/T's cool!
45 pounds,... baby!
Come to think of it, (I'm remembering now), it's about the same size as the M-30!
A/T: L-21"/ W-24"/ D-5" (weight 45lbs). Metal top-plate/metal construction.
Yeah, that A/T's cool!
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
Hmm, I wonder where Dave will be in about 4 or 5 days ? Hint: Burbank! 
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
Gee,... you must get a lot done by not being logged on all the time, like me!!
Heh..............
Heh..............
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
A Reel Person said:45 pounds,... baby!
Yeah, that's what blew me away! A guy at a music store once asked me why I'm so hanged up on the weight of audio equipment. I said because whatever weighs more, is better!
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
A Reel Person said:Heh..............
I must have it setup so I appear offline .... Gotta fix that ..
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
There .. I'm "active" now!
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
Still, I think dbx would have been a better choice on the RMX64.
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
Ah,...
so!..............................
So much gear, and so little time!
so!..............................
So much gear, and so little time!
A Reel Person
It's Too Funky in Here!!!
...
Yeah, I agree. I think Dolby SUCKS, but the A/T RMX64 is a nice unit, alright! I'd probably run it without Dolby.cjacek said:
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
A Reel Person said:Yeah, I agree. I think Dolby SUCKS, but the A/T RMX64 is a nice unit, alright! I'd probably run it without Dolby.
Yeah, it'd probably sound very good, without NR, considering the built of this thing!
Agreed on the Dolby! It's pretty useless imho.