
rob aylestone
Moderator
Have you seen how quick people are getting jumped on for miming - I don't say lip-syncing. Ken Tamplin is currently being executed and his attempt to do the Streisand approach has failed big time. People like Fil - Wings of Pegasus and lots of others are applying music technology skills to validate the miming, and it seems so many very big names routinely do it.
I'm not going into the morals and ethics, but the technology.
We take a live performance and we can take the stems and fix mistakes - the trumpet player blasts screaming F sharp instead of an F. A few seconds in Cubase or your favourite DAW and it is fixed. We can take those strangled high notes and overdub them - after all, we've all got older, and while missing the note in front of a few hundred/thousand fans may be forgiven, do you want it replayed millions of times and talked about. The messed up guitar solo - a huge list of common cock-ups.
We can fix them, but it seems as technologists, we're fixing them really poorly. The test, as seen on youtube is isolating the vocal (or other source) then overlaying it on a fan video shot at a different place on a different date. If they line up, the secret is blown. What I don't get is that you can so easily make waveforms NOT fit. You do not have to snap the tuning to exactly C, you could move it to a little high and slowly drift down, and you can so easily stretch and warp the timing, just modifying the timing forward in back, and putting in little extended gaps. It would be so easy to make a 'perfect' vocal that is different. Easy in the studio, but if you are using a live stem, you could set up a template that would make sure lining up two waveforms just didn't work, and apply this to the tracks you are using before the show. A few cents here or there and subtle tempo flow. The technology could fool Wings of Pegasus's method so easily.
My question is that if it's possible, 'names' must be stupid to not do this. We can all spot bad miming, so when some people do it so well, why don't we also make the technology invisible.
I totally get that you want your youtube video to look good and sound immaculate - but if you cheat, cheat properly. Once your cheat is out there, like Ken Tamplin's is - it is too late. They guys is a studio whizz, so doing a poor re-record is really his fault. Deleting and then re-editing even more stupid as deleted videos are always findable somewhere.
I guess I'm saying that if you are going to cheat, make sure you cheat properly!
I'm not going into the morals and ethics, but the technology.
We take a live performance and we can take the stems and fix mistakes - the trumpet player blasts screaming F sharp instead of an F. A few seconds in Cubase or your favourite DAW and it is fixed. We can take those strangled high notes and overdub them - after all, we've all got older, and while missing the note in front of a few hundred/thousand fans may be forgiven, do you want it replayed millions of times and talked about. The messed up guitar solo - a huge list of common cock-ups.
We can fix them, but it seems as technologists, we're fixing them really poorly. The test, as seen on youtube is isolating the vocal (or other source) then overlaying it on a fan video shot at a different place on a different date. If they line up, the secret is blown. What I don't get is that you can so easily make waveforms NOT fit. You do not have to snap the tuning to exactly C, you could move it to a little high and slowly drift down, and you can so easily stretch and warp the timing, just modifying the timing forward in back, and putting in little extended gaps. It would be so easy to make a 'perfect' vocal that is different. Easy in the studio, but if you are using a live stem, you could set up a template that would make sure lining up two waveforms just didn't work, and apply this to the tracks you are using before the show. A few cents here or there and subtle tempo flow. The technology could fool Wings of Pegasus's method so easily.
My question is that if it's possible, 'names' must be stupid to not do this. We can all spot bad miming, so when some people do it so well, why don't we also make the technology invisible.
I totally get that you want your youtube video to look good and sound immaculate - but if you cheat, cheat properly. Once your cheat is out there, like Ken Tamplin's is - it is too late. They guys is a studio whizz, so doing a poor re-record is really his fault. Deleting and then re-editing even more stupid as deleted videos are always findable somewhere.
I guess I'm saying that if you are going to cheat, make sure you cheat properly!