The RME Fireface UFX has landed

  • Thread starter Thread starter thefees
  • Start date Start date
T

thefees

New member
Well I pulled the plug and went in deep. I ordered the new RME Fireface UFX. It is new just out in October or November of 2010 and when you read what it does, really does, I couldn't help but go for it. I have to say out of all of my research, the RME 400 and 800 were the only interfaces that garnered 5 star reviews across the board, with unparalleled compatibility, no driver problems, and superb audio quality, and that is saying something considering it came out in 2004. After all of that time if there was a problem it would have surfaced by now.

Some of the new features that took me over the top. USB and Firewire. Plus a USB on the front that they are working on the firmware update for, and you will be able to plug a portable hard drive or USB dongle into and automatically record everything that is coming through the mixer which is built in. So you don't need a computer plugged in to record. Also has effects, EQ, compression, reverb etc built in. Next item up for bid is the ability on the front panel screen to see indicators of all levels, and not just for input levels, but for every parameter which are fully adjustable on the fly. You press a button and it brings up multiple screens, one at a time. You can also do a preset with your computer like the Motu 896, as a matter of fact you have 6 user presets plus one factory preset, but then you can edit any preset on the fly without a computer attached. This unit truly has standalone capabilities. As a matter of fact with dual DSP chips onboard, if you are playing live, the mixer works in standalone mode so if your computer crashes the audience won't even notice, not to mention that the mixer and effects carry a zero CPU load.

It is the only one that has universal acceptance across the board in all reviews for Mac and PC's. Both platforms work equally as well. That is important because with this unit and running Pro Tools 9 which I just picked up, you have the option of running it in your PC now, and then picking up a Mac and running it in that also. With the cross compatiblity of Pro Tools 9, and their now universal hardware acceptance (you don't need to run it on MAudio anymore) and being able to load it in an unlimited amount of machines both Mac and PC and then use only one at a time with the iLok USB key you can load it into your laptop, desktop, and Mac machines all for one license. I am a PC guy but there is a Mac in my future; gotta love em.

Then when someone wants to collaborate, I can do so in either platform. Just unplug the RME UFX usb port from one machine, and plug it in the other. Wahlah dual platforms in an instant. Like fireface better, pick up a good fireface card and use it instead, although the rep from RME stated that their new technology using USB is with certain configurations actually now giving them better preformance than a PCI Express firewire card. The online test review I just read proved that to be the case with the USB connection providing half the latency of the firewire connection.

In plain words the RME is the most compatible platform to work in both the PC and Mac enviroment without driver problems. You hear expressions like, "This thing works in all my PC's, and this thing works in all my Macs". Pro Tools 9 works in both as well, however it requires Win & or Mac's newer operating systems, and since PT9 has such a great video component you need at least 128MB dedicated video memory, or even better yet one of their approved cards. For live recording, I can just use Pro Tools LE 8 in my laptop and then do final mixing in the home studio with PT9.

I guess you can tell that I am nuts about the new toy. RME is expensive and they only give you 4 super high quality mic pre's instead of 8. They take the technology and some of the components from their dedicated pre's and put them in the UFX. They also have dual AD DA converters on every mic pre and they say that is technological breakthrough providing new levels of signal to noise ratio, and quality of sound.

I also love the dual MIDI in and out on the front, and a second pair of MIDI in and out on the back for a total of 2 ins and 2 outs. Great if you don't want to have to purchase a MIDI plug in port.
They also have 2 separate headphone jacks on the front, and you can create up to 15 different sub mixes. It's a 12 channel input if you include the combo pre/line ins on 4 of them, but it will record up to 30 channels in, and 30 channels out at the same time using additional peripherals running through SPDIF or ADAT.

This RME is an all in one stand alone mixer, preamp, effects unit, AD DA converter. It does what a whole rack of gear usually does.
It is 2 or 3 times the price, and I can see that people are having luck with the Motu and Presonus equipment. What tilted me in this direction was someone I grew up with who is the pro sound guy in my local guitar center told me something that opened my eyes. He said that let me give you the proper perspective. Dedicated mic pres are 1800 dollars each, as in one channel. You want stereo get 2. So for them to make a combo box with 8 mic pres, and all of the rest is a feat of magic, so something has to give somewhere.

I also found that no matter what level you see there are people who are still aspiring to something else. I also noticed that a lot of people go through a lot of converters before settling in on something that they love. I thought after all of that why not just get what I believe in from the beginning. I also see what they are going for used and realize it is not spending money, it is somewhat of an investment. Can I sell it used for what I paid for it, of course not, but the difference of what it sells for new and what they are going for used is not that harmful. I don't ever plan on selling it. I was told that when I want to add more mic pre's go with a focusrite.

I guess I am talking too much already. I should be listening instead. I have been a musician for a long time, had a MIDI studio back when DOS was out, but I haven't been involved in the home recording enthusiasm in a long time, so I am back. Hope to learn a lot here.

By the way Avid.com Pro Tools 9 sys req is Windows 7 32 or 64 bit or MAC OS I think 10.5 or higher. They also have only 4 video cards listed that they approve so I picked up the Nvidia Quaddro FX 580 and the Windows performance test built into 7 gave me a 40 percent increase in performance ratings because of it. It automatically disabled my onboard video on my ASUS board. The NVidia has dual outs supporting 2 monitors so I am excited to find out if the split screen between the mixer screen and other screen is possible. That way the 24" HD LCD monitor can have one, and with an HDMI plug fed into the big screen Samsung LCD HDTV will provide the other. I'm dreaming of creating You Tube videos in the studio so that will be a totally cool environment/backdrop to shoot from. Pro Tools 9 also provides a video track. I have from before the Pinnacle Studios Ultimate Collection HD video editing package which is also made by AVID, the maker of Pro Tools so the two should merge nicely.
I bought the DVD video because I have a ton of learning to do. Then you start staring at the HD video cams... Does it never end? :-)
 
Last edited:
Control Surface with RME Fireface UFX

Can / Are you using a control surface with the totalmix-fx mixer?
Very important feature in my opinion and RME hasn't been clear on this in the past.
 
Maybe someone can chime in and help with this question. Far from being a pro with RME equipment I am instead someone new to it. I'm anxiously awaiting the arrival.
 
Is RME stuff thought of as having excellent stable drivers under Windows, especially Windows 7?

I'm probably going to ditch a MOTU interface soon; I've had trouble with it under both XP and Win7.
 
Is RME stuff thought of as having excellent stable drivers under Windows, especially Windows 7?

I'm probably going to ditch a MOTU interface soon; I've had trouble with it under both XP and Win7.

Yes, Yes, Yes. I am not here to offend anyone, but I have to be honest. Look at the first page of this forum, it is FILLED with people who are having problems. The thing that kept driving me to the RME stuff was that they build the most rock solid drivers, and oddly enough they have done so successfully in both Windows including 7 both 32 and 64 bit, and Mac.

Before somebody shoots me, let me say that Motu is made for Mac's and by the way they have thrown in some Windows drivers, and conversely PreSonus, and I was staring at the 2626 for he longest time seems to be built for Windows, and by the way they have some Mac drivers. There are many reports of each of these that people are having some luck with in their respective versions for the operating system they are using. For example the Motu 828 seems to be designed more for Windows, and the 896M3 is designed for Mac. It is possible to match up a Motu or Presonus piece of gear and get pretty good results, as long as you don't do a side by side comparison in actual results with the RME stuff; anything RME by the way, even the RME 400.

As one high end studio engineer put it in another forum, RME is better than anything that Motu or Presonus makes. Many say that the Motu, even the 896Mk3 is muddy. What they actually say is that the Motu has a good clock but muddy pre's, and the Presonus has pretty good pre's but a clock that is not so good. Like I said in my opening post in this thread, trying to take the job of an 1800 to 2800 preamp for one channel, and provide 4 to 8 of them plus converters, effects and the works for 600 to 1000 dollars is impossible; something has to give. So the RME UFX gives you 4 very high quality mic pres, with a total of 12 inputs. With attached peripherals you can have 30 inputs and 30 outputs all controlled by the RME UFX. RME has an 8 channel mic pre unit that is designed to work with an outbound complete unit like the UFX for cheap. Also I was advised to get the Focusrite if you want more pre's. The Liquid 56 gives you 2 high quality pres, and then 6 more that are pretty good.

The bottom line is that I am more interested in making music than I am in fighting with reliability issues.

I do want to say that no matter how high you are in the food chain with this stuff, there is always something better. I heard an online forum comparison of the RME Fireface 800, and then the same clip for the RME Fireface UFX, and then the UFX using a $3800 Lavry Blue handling the AD DA chores and the sound was excellent in all three, but you could hear a little more "solidness" in the UFX, over the 800, and the clip with the Lavry AD DA also was a little more solid but it also had even a tad more "smoothness" to it. If you had to do a comparison, and took a ten minute break between hearing the clips, you wouldn't know the difference, but clicking back and forth you could discern a slight difference.

I think perfection is an elusive trap. No matter how high you go it is always one step further out of your grasp. Be that as it may, when you get to the RME UFX you are up where where the air is rare, and you are reliably going to get a first class product every time. I have read reviews, and more reviews, and more reviews, and they all love it. One guy said I have one as the center of my professional studio, and use it all day long for the past three years, and it didn't let me down once in all of that time. On the other hand, I have read reviews from another brand where they had reboot problems and couldn't get another manufacturers machine to work for the last 2 hours of a session. Five musicians took a day off and they couldn't finish their work because the converter was not functioning.

I have a saying that I have been using for a long time. I believe in saving money, as in saving dollars, but "Every time I save a dime, it winds up costing me a fortune".
My Dad used to buy cheap faucets, and then had to replace them, by the time he was done, he paid for a quality faucet, but still had a cheap one.

I'm not rich nor am I trying to show off. I put the RME on a 6.24% credit card that is costing me only $13 and some cents per month in interest, and I hope to pay it off within a year. I also decided to sell some junk/stuff I had lying around that I knew I would never use again, and was able to raise over $800 toward the purchase. So that is how much it means to me. Also as I mentioned, the depreciation on a product heralded so high is no more than 25% for the first two years if you keep the box, and all the stuff that comes with it. So you are not walking off of a plank.

The converter is really your whole studio. Everything else is just your musical instruments, and it doesn't matter in terms of quality what level of computer you are using because all the computer is doing is capturing zeros and ones; digital data and spewing it back out again. Sure more powerful machines can handle larger amounts at the same time, enabling bigger projects, but the point I am making here is the quality of your sound all comes down to how good the microphone pre and inputs are, and the AD DA converters. It takes the analogue sound and makes zeros and ones (digitize) and then reconverts that back to an analouge sound again. So the quality of your studio really is for the most part your converter. So if you are serious about recording your, or other peoples music, that is something that you don't want to scrimp on.

This all of course is my opinion, and I can't see someone who just wants to do some playing around with laying down some tracks having to go out and spend 2 grand on a converter. I guess it depends on what you needs are. Now that I have gotten that off of my chest, I feel better and I hope I haven't offended anyone. Sometimes you just gotta tell it like it is. I have been studying this for a long time, and that is what I found. I couldn't find a rock solid answer in terms of other converters reliably doing the job. They all had compatiblity issues with different hardware components etc, BUT the RME work with just about everything, new, old, Windows, Mac you name it. Like two different reviewers said, this thing works in all my PC's, and another guy said, "This thing works in all my Macs." I'm sure there are a lot of people who are very happy with their gear and didn't have to spend all of that money.
 
I've begun thinking about this piece of gear as the first piece in setting up a home recording studio for a band I mix for. I am also looking at the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56 as the alternative. I'm totally new to evaluating this stuff, and it does seem like you could spend a small fortune just on one pre. Can anyone offer some real world based comparisons of the pre's in these two devices? Thanks in advance. By the way, I'm planning on going with Cakebread's X1 Producer as the software component.
 
Back
Top