Suggestions for beginner reading

  • Thread starter Thread starter cloakedcrow
  • Start date Start date
C

cloakedcrow

New member
Hello, all. This is my first post here, and I am, by every definition of the word, a newbie.

Recently, I wrote a song that, in my opinion and that of my close friend's, is (to be blunt) the shiznaught. Granted, we were not completely in our right minds at the time I picked to reveal the song to my friend, but regardless, he took it and started writing a guitar part for it. Since then, I've written several other songs that have potential, at least in my own little self-deluded world. Anyway, the point of my post is this: I'm a singer. I sing. I know nothing about recording. But I want to get these babies down on tape, get together some musician friends of mine, make a record. Not a spiffed-up, clean-cut album by any means, but just five or six songs that I can send to a CD duplication place, put in paper sleeves, and hand out in front of the campus union or something. Let people know I exist, and that, if they have the same warped sense of reality that I do, they might be able to enjoy my ideas.

So I'm looking at four-tracks. I'm thinking pretty seriously about the Tascam 414mkII, because it's cheap enough that a poor college student like me can afford it, if I save up, and because it looks like I could use it for a while. As in, I could maybe actually make a lo-fi album with it in the future, instead of saying, "Hmm, this MF-P01 was good for getting my ideas down before I forgot them, but now I want to make something actually listenable, so I guess I'll go plunk down two-hundred fifty bucks for yet another machine. . ." Anyway, if anybody has got advice regarding why I should or shouldn't get this particular 4-track, please speak up. Because I know nothing about recording. (Which brings us to the actual point of this post.) In fact, I'm looking for a book that will help me out. The internet is great, but I can get a lot more from a single bound, complete work that from scattered articles. So I need advice on a book on home recording that starts with the extreme basics but eventually goes far enough that one could use its advice to, like I said, record a low-fi album. (Hey, Neutral Milk Hotel's first big album was made on a four-track. And just look where they are now! Oh, wait. . . Well, regardless, In The Aereoplane Over The Sea was freaking awesome.) I glanced at Home Recording for Dummies online, but I'm not sure if it focuses completely on "modern recording techniques" like digital, or if it goes into analog tracking as well.

Whew. There I go. So more succinctly, I'm a complete recording novice who has an idea of the recorder he wants but needs a book to tell him what he's doing. Any advice?

-ravienne
 
Hey man...I know you're looking for a book of sorts but this page actually has so much more information. Granted, it is semi-scattered but incredibly up to date.

Anyways, seriously think about the 424mkIII instead of the 414. I realize you're on a budget (as am I) - but the 80-100 bucks difference is well worth it. Save up for it - recycle cans, go for clear beer pong cups instead of colored...whatever it takes. The 424 has better adjustable EQ. The overall product you create will sound much better.
 
If I can find the 424, I'll definitely spring for that. I took a look on the website, and it does look like it could offer me more long-term bang. But I can't seem to find any. All of the online retailers I find it at say it's been discontinued. Is there a good place where I'm not looking?

EDIT: Whoops, I just found the website of a local retailer, and the site says they've got it. $329, not terribly bad. You were right, about $80 more than the 414.
 
hey, i am new to this too, and i feel your pain. i have two thoughts from my recent experiences...
1) i recently got a 424 mkIII. it is great for analogue 4-tracking. i got mine on e-bay for $150. it is barely used, works great, not even a smudge. there are are a few for sale under $200 rite now, along with many fancier machines (watch out there are many 424's that are older and not mkIII's). be patient, bid smart, you can have one too!

2) while i thought my mkIII was a great cheap entrance to recording i soon learned it was only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. i know you planning kwikee lo-fi, but, it takes many pieces to even do that well. plan on mics, booms, cables, (maybe a pre-amp) -to get sound in; pro cassettes, de-gausser, cleaning fluids, headphones -to run the 4-track; good cables, studio monitors, compression & reverb, and a mixdown burner/deck -to get sound out. and those, my friend, are just the basics.

so, i am not trying to scare you, but i think its worth the effort to present those hit singles in the light they deserve. IMHO, amazing recordings require excellent equip, excellent talent, and years of engineering experience. decent recording requires good equip, good talent, and common-sense (and experimentation!). cheap equip whipped out without effort will put your material on tape, but not much more. of course, that may be enough for you. i have found ways of getting good equip cheap. and there is certainly nothing wrong with starting with what you got; you will find out what you need to acquire next real fast!

last thought: i found "idiot's guide to home recording" and the ubiquitous "billboards guide to home recording" at my local library. oh yeah, i'm cheap bas***d.
 
You will find Modern Recording Techniques by David Miles Huber hard to beat.
 
beginner books

i'd agree that there's lots to be found on the web - but sometimes - you just wanna book! in the bath for instance (when WILL they get round to a totally bubblebath proof PC?)

anyway:

Recording & Production Techniques - Paul White
Sanctuary Publishing
ISBN: 1-86074-443-5
very very readable intro from the editor of the UKs biggest semi-pro studio magazine

also a good read is:
Behind The Glass - Howard Massey
ISBN: 0879306149
more about the way the top producers do it - but i found it a very useful read.

enjoy and good luck

paul d
 
Thanks for the great advice, everyone; it's helping me quite a lot.

I've got one more question. (I hope somebody knowledgeable will bother reading down to this post so I won't have to post a whole 'nother topic to get in people's way. . .) Anyway, as I was glancing through the site, specifically the area talking about Dragon's setup, I noticed that after the Tascam 424, he got the 488 8-track. I glanced at the review and, on a whim, put in a search on eBay. There are mkII 488s there that are as cheap or cheaper than the 424s.

The review said that the 488 was easy to use. Would that be, easy enough for a newbie to use, starting with the basic features and slowly expanding into the real meat of it? Or easy enough for the casual musician, already familiar with the most basic recording techniques, to use without confusion? Would a machine like the 488 pretty much overwhelm a complete novice?

Thanks for the advice so far, y'all!
 
if you go to the tacam forum you will find threads on the pros /cons of the 488 vs. 424.
i realized as soon as i got the 424 (which, i admit, was on a bit of a whim) that 8 tracks are more then double the benefit of 4. particularlly if there will be drums, or drum machine, involved.
however, 8 tracks on one cassette tape gives me images of clowns in a vw bug. they say it works though. also, there are no xlr inputs on the 488 (why? why?). last concern is that they are older and unsupported cause the industry now believes that 8-track and up is a digital only market.
for me, i wanted to spend less than $200 and figured, in the long run, i would eventually take over my wife's very nice new laptop and go digital that way. so i am satisfied. i think for live recording to cassette i would rather have the 4-track with balanced xlr pre-amps.
but, to answer your question, no i don't think the 488 is any harder to use than the 424. tascams are very intuitive, imho. just move slow so you don't tweak the wrong dial (there are a lot of them!).
 
Back
Top