Studio monitors for under $300

  • Thread starter Thread starter lttoler
  • Start date Start date
L

lttoler

New member
I am looking to get a set of monitors to run to my computer becuase I have been using the stock speakers (dell) for a few months and they just really suck for what I'm doin. I'm under a kinda tight budget, preferably around $200. I've been looking at the Samson line, but I really don't know much about them. I also need to get a soundcard so I can run both the monitors and headphones to my comp. If anyone can suggest a soundcard and a set of monitors, it would be a great help.
 
The KRK RP-5's are 150 a piece, but are well-worth it. If ya can't swing more than 200 bucks, I'd hold out, but that's just my opinion - I know scrapin cash together can be difficult. As for soundcards, I record outboard so I got no suggestions there. Check out the computer recording category for probably a lot of similar questions that have been answered.
 
Tascam vl-x5 - $240. I've heard good things about them, and plan to get them myself.

How are you recording? Are you recording? You could get a very small mixer and plug from the line-out of your soundcard to the mixer, and then from your mixer to monitors. Also from you mixer to the line-in of the soundcard, giving you the option to record. This would give you volume control of your monitors, a headphone amp, a preamp for mic, and maybe other inputs and outputs/options.

You could instead get something like the M-AUDIO Fast Track USB, or even the Behringer USB Podcast Recording Package, which would probably give you less latency issues than what you'd experience with the line-in/out of your on-board soundcard.
 
Last edited:
Check out the Behringer Truths the passive joints and get you a nice lil amp. That will put you at around 175 or so cause i paid 127.50 for mines brand new from musiciansfriends. Then get a Tascam US-122 since it comes wit a decent preamp and inputs for mics/guitars/other gear.
 
misscc803 said:
Check out the Behringer Truths the passive joints and get you a nice lil amp. That will put you at around 175 or so cause i paid 127.50 for mines brand new from musiciansfriends. Then get a Tascam US-122 since it comes wit a decent preamp and inputs for mics/guitars/other gear.
Can you recomend an amp for them? I'm always stuck when it comes to amps for studio monitors. I don't really know what I'm looking for. I'm more of a live sound guy.
 
$300 under for monitors...

Monitors:
I like the Tascam suggestion. Never heard them either, but your price pointing. $249 pair, they have amps built in, known company.

card:
PC recording interface box. USB type or fire
they now start around $79 for 2 channel digital, most including full Recording software and more. USB, Firewire... and thats new. Used is probably half-off?

$99 US Mobile- M-Audio for one that seems to be on most shelves, has hundreds of reviews and rates around a 6 of 10.
$79 Behringer

this level-budget recording stuff rarely holds its value, over 5yrs...

its better bang than tools costing thousands though years ago...like my $1200 Cassette 4 track in 1979! Now you can get 500 tracks of digital for $99?

of cvourse you have the pc already, so your set good.
 
Okay, thanks for the replies. Actually I record with a Line 6 Toneport that has been working fairly good for me. I read on another post that the toneport works as a sound card so I wouldn't need to buy another. I also forgot to add that I need something with really good bass responce. We play sort of classic rock but with hip hop style drums and bass.
 
pandamonk said:
Can you recomend an amp for them? I'm always stuck when it comes to amps for studio monitors. I don't really know what I'm looking for. I'm more of a live sound guy.


I use the American Audio VLP600 amp with the Truths. I set my amp mid way and get a good response. The VLP gives off 300W Per Channel at 4 ohms and all the Behringer Truths need is 150W at 4ohms so that amp offers more than enough power to power them but if fully blasted I could blow my SPEAKERS. You want to look for an amp that offers 150W or more(more is usually better) at 4 ohms. For instance the amp below thats a pretty decent price at Musicians Friends would power the Behringer Truths b/c it offers 150W at 4 ohms.

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Nady-XA300-Stereo-Power-Amplifier?sku=482059


-----------------------

To Poster: You said u have a soundcard so thats fine well if you take the route I took(more options are available im just offering a solution that worked for me) then this an estimation of what you might spend.

Behringer Truths-$150( I paid $127.50 b/c they did a price match up)
Amp-$65(Try ebay first for new priced gear at a lower or best offer price)
Behringer MX802A Mixer:$50

Total:$265.00

What are your thoughts on that lil setup?


Nicole

 
Last edited:
lttoler said:
Okay, thanks for the replies. Actually I record with a Line 6 Toneport that has been working fairly good for me. I read on another post that the toneport works as a sound card so I wouldn't need to buy another. I also forgot to add that I need something with really good bass responce. We play sort of classic rock but with hip hop style drums and bass.
Yup, the toneport seems pretty decent. The Tascam vl-x5s have a, supposed, freq response of 45Hz-22kHz, which is well enough. The lowest you will need is probably 60Hz. The Behringer Truths offer 55Hz-21kHz, although they have much bigger woofers, so I'd of thought they'd have much better bass response than the Tascams.
 
misscc803 said:

I use the American Audio VLP600 amp with the Truths. I set my amp mid way and get a good response. The VLP gives off 300W Per Channel at 4 ohms and all the Behringer Truths need is 150W at 4ohms so that amp offers more than enough power to power them but if fully blasted I could blow my amp. You want to look for an amp that offers 150W or more(more is usually better) at 4 ohms. For instance the amp below thats a pretty decent price at Musicians Friends would power the Behringer Truths b/c it offers 150W at 4 ohms.

http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Nady-XA300-Stereo-Power-Amplifier?sku=482059

So, would something like this be ok? I'd of thought you'd need a different type of amp, or higher quality, than you'd use for live sound. Also, I don't understand how you'd blow the amp rather than the speakers from running them too high. I should know this for live sound also, but I've never really been told or found out.
 

LOL I meant to say blow my speaker not amp. My bad. Yep that amp would work fine wit those monitors.

Nicole

 
misscc803 said:

LOL I meant to say blow my speaker not amp. My bad. Yep that amp would work fine wit those monitors.

Nicole

Really? Shouldn't it be a higher class amp? Won't this one be of much lesser quality than a better one, and have a detrimental effect on mixing? If not, then why do people bother getting the actives? You could save a lot and just get the passives with a cheap amp.
 

Thats were preference comes in to play. You get passive monitors u can then control what type of amp pushes your monitors. Which I feel gives you alot more control over your mixes and sound output from the monitors.

Nicole

 
pandamonk said:
Really? Shouldn't it be a higher class amp? Won't this one be of much lesser quality than a better one, and have a detrimental effect on mixing? If not, then why do people bother getting the actives? You could save a lot and just get the passives with a cheap amp.
Active moniters are a bit different from just supplying your own power amp to passive moniters. Mainly an active moniter has its crossover splitting the high and low frequency of your signal BEFORE it gets amplified. It then feeds TWO seperate power amps within the same box so both the woofer and tweeter get thier own individual powered signal at thier ideal wattage and respective frequency. The advantage of this is minimal signal loss compared to passive moniters which use a passive resistance type crossover that splits the powerd signal AFTER the power amp.

As a result, active moniters tend to have a more pure sound with better presence and clarity over passives which is why people like them. Thats not to say quality passives cant also sound great too, but when you start to add up all the extra components and features that go into active moniters, you begin to see what justifies thier higher price tag. To duplicate the same thing with passive moniters you would need to use an active external crossover with two seperate stereo power amps yhen modify your moniters to receive both hi and low inputs.

misscc803 said:
Thats were preference comes in to play. You get passive monitors u can then control what type of amp pushes your monitors. Which I feel gives you alot more control over your mixes and sound output from the monitors
Although I'd definately agree with that when it comes to high powered PA stuff, I wouldnt nessisarily apply that same logic when shopping studio moniters for the reasons I stated above. On a tight budget however, good passives with a cheap amp might very well work out better than any bottom of the barrel actives in the same price range.
 
Last edited:
hrmm I'm in the market to buy some new monitors as well.... but as my luck has it my fridge and stove just went on me.. (fridge leaks water.. oven pretty much literally exploded) thus my budjet for monitors has greatly depleted (I'll be lucky to get anything really) that in mind I do have a decent power amp... in town here I can get a set of yorkville actives for about 300 or a set of yorkville passives for about 250.. i have yet to hear the passives.. i liked the actives until they turned it up really loud and I noticed some distortion.... but it was rediculously loud and I can't imagine pumping the volume that loud.. that being said.. would it be more likely that the passives will be much better?

Also what about some of the m-audio monitors.. I hear the bass reponse on some of the more "affordable" models are terrible.. is this something I could get used to you think?

I'm mixing a couple projects and I NEED monitors and I can't wait a few months to save more money.. just something to get me by until I can get good monitors.
 
NRS said:
Active moniters are a bit different from just supplying your own power amp to passive moniters. Mainly an active moniter has its crossover splitting the high and low frequency of your signal BEFORE it gets amplified. It then feeds TWO seperate power amps within the same box so both the woofer and tweeter get thier own individual powered signal at thier ideal wattage and respective frequency. The advantage of this is minimal signal loss compared to passive moniters which use a passive resistance type crossover that splits the powerd signal AFTER the power amp.

As a result, active moniters tend to have a more pure sound with better presence and clarity over passives which is why people like them. Thats not to say quality passives cant also sound great too, but when you start to add up all the extra components and features that go into active moniters, you begin to see what justifies thier higher price tag. To duplicate the same thing with passive moniters you would need to use an active external crossover with two seperate stereo power amps yhen modify your moniters to receive both hi and low inputs.


Although I'd definately agree with that when it comes to high powered PA stuff, I wouldnt nessisarily apply that same logic when shopping studio moniters for the reasons I stated above. On a tight budget however, good passives with a cheap amp might very well work out better than any bottom of the barrel actives in the same price range.
Very well explained. I suppose I kind of new all this anyway, but just didn't think, haha. Thanks
 
doesn't it cost more money to put together a good quality active crossover than a passive? what's the chance of getting good active crossovers in a pair of low buck monitors?
 
engine joe said:
doesn't it cost more money to put together a good quality active crossover than a passive? what's the chance of getting good active crossovers in a pair of low buck monitors?

I think you mean active moniter and I'd imagine the biggest expense in an active moniter is more its internal power amps than the crossover itself, although I'd also think the crossover in an active system costs more to build than a passive one.

Shopping active moniters on a tight budget might just mean you have to settle for moniters with smaller drivers and less power than you would prefer but since accuracy and fedelity are way more important in mixing than having the biggest baddest drivers, small moniters shouldnt nessisarily cripple you.
 
NRS said:
I think you mean active moniter

no, i meant active crossover. how good can the power supply, amps, and crossover be in a low budget monitor in comparison to a passive monitor and external amp?
 
Back
Top