strat vs. tele

  • Thread starter Thread starter musicfan1234
  • Start date Start date
M

musicfan1234

New member
Hi i dont really play guitar :) but i do play alittle enough to record guitar tracks myself and such. I am looking to either buy a cheap strat or tele for recording. I am looking for a nice heavy reverb sound on the guitar. I was wonder if the strat or tele would be better for this type of sound. i know its all a matter of opinion but i would love to hear what you all think.

Thanks,

Billy
 
My Opin-Onion......................

..........nuttin' beats a STRAT!!!!!!!!!!
 
It depends on what kind of music you will be trying to play, what amp you will be using and what your own special ears tell you is better.:D
 
Reverb has probably been added on to every single guitar ever recorded.

I say its about time to hit up GC and mess around with some guitars.
 
I have played some strats, and I've noticed so far that the real sound depends on which pickups they've got.

I found the one having Custom '54 Strat pickups got too much difference over the ones using the Texas series...

Of course the amp counts.
 
I believe you will find that a Strat is more versatile...
 
I agree that a Strat may be more versitile then a Tele. Nothing beats a Tele for country chickin' pinkin' but I think a Strat can give you more sound options. I have a Strat & a Tele.

Obviously, the amp, strings, pick-ups, technique and musical styles all make a difference - but if I had to choose between the two I would go with a Strat
 
strat kicks ass

hey-yo,

My final opinion on electric guitar choice comes down to this:

Playing a strat is easier than other similarly priced guitars. I play a les paul, a casino semi-hollow, a taylor acoustic and a lone star strat and I always feel like I'm at a disadvantage playing anything other than the strat. I feel like I"m cheating with a secret weapon. Strat's the way to go, especially if you're not a terribly strong player.

Stone
 
Frankly, I've never understood the claim that a Stratocaster is "versatile." I've got a couple (including an all-original pre-CBS) and I've always regarded them as extremely limited, pretty much one-trick axes that would have gone into oblivion without the addition of the 2 & 4 pickup switch positions that give the unique Stratocaster "quack." There's nothing that special about them otherwise and the stock ones I've played over the years have always seemed unsatisfactory for what I was trying to do. Particularly, I find the lower tones and pickups inadequate for jazzy chord-based and clean playing. A guitarist needs a Stratocaster in the toolkit for the "quack" sounds, but when a guitarist uses a Stratocaster for his main instrument, I have a pretty good idea beforehand that I'm probably not going to like his music.

The Telecaster, on the other hand, seems to startle everyone with the sounds one can get from it. Particularly, the kind of sound you can get out of the neck pickup on many Telecasters is amazingly rich. I was startled to find that with some of my amps I was getting better jazz tones from my ash/rosewood 2000 American Standard than I was getting from my deep-box dedicated jazz hollowbody. Old Telecaster hands pointed out that the Telecaster was used by Barney Kessel and other jazz greats in some recordings in the '50s and it worked well even then. The combination of bridge and neck pickups also has a very interesting and underrated unique sound.

I think probably the most versatile Fender by a country mile is the Nashville Telecaster, which not only gets the standard Telecaster sounds, but also does a decent approximation of the Stratocaster's "quack" thing. It's an ugly axe, but it works great as a concept.

While I cannot say anything about the MIM Nashville as I've never had one, my MIA "Hotrodded" B-Bender Nashville is simply remarkable. It comes with a combination of Delta-Tone and Texas Special pickups and has a different mid-position configuration than the MIM. The B-Bender makes it a horrifically heavy axe, but it really does do some amazing stuff.
 
bongolation said:
Frankly, I've never understood the claim that a Stratocaster is "versatile." I've got a couple (including an all-original pre-CBS) and I've always regarded them as extremely limited, pretty much one-trick axes that would have gone into oblivion without the addition of the 2 & 4 pickup switch positions that give the unique Stratocaster "quack." There's nothing that special about them otherwise and the stock ones I've played over the years have always seemed unsatisfactory for what I was trying to do. Particularly, I find the lower tones and pickups inadequate for jazzy chord-based and clean playing. A guitarist needs a Stratocaster in the toolkit for the "quack" sounds, but when a guitarist uses a Stratocaster for his main instrument, I have a pretty good idea beforehand that I'm probably not going to like his music.

The Telecaster, on the other hand, seems to startle everyone with the sounds one can get from it. Particularly, the kind of sound you can get out of the neck pickup on many Telecasters is amazingly rich. I was startled to find that with some of my amps I was getting better jazz tones from my ash/rosewood 2000 American Standard than I was getting from my deep-box dedicated jazz hollowbody. Old Telecaster hands pointed out that the Telecaster was used by Barney Kessel and other jazz greats in some recordings in the '50s and it worked well even then. The combination of bridge and neck pickups also has a very interesting and underrated unique sound.

I think probably the most versatile Fender by a country mile is the Nashville Telecaster, which not only gets the standard Telecaster sounds, but also does a decent approximation of the Stratocaster's "quack" thing. It's an ugly axe, but it works great as a concept.

While I cannot say anything about the MIM Nashville as I've never had one, my MIA "Hotrodded" B-Bender Nashville is simply remarkable. It comes with a combination of Delta-Tone and Texas Special pickups and has a different mid-position configuration than the MIM. The B-Bender makes it a horrifically heavy axe, but it really does do some amazing stuff.

What?
 
I'm with bongolation on this one. The tele can go jazz, country, blues or rock. The strat is simply a rock or blues guitar traditionally. Now I really like the sound of a strat and would use one live over a tele if I was a lead guitar player. But studio-wise the tele covers a lot more ground.

I also agree on the Nashville tele having the widest range of tones you can find in one guitar.
 
I've played and owned several strats (Fender as well as copies) and a couple of teles, the strats seemed alittle more flexable as far as tonal range goes but the teles have more crispness so it depends on what sort of sound you are looking (or listening) for.
As I don't know your style, it's hard to recomend either. After playing for a lot of years (well over thirty) I've learned that a lot of what a guitar will do depends on how it feels. Different pickups and different strings will alter the sound more than you may think. I urge you to find the guitar that feels right to you, then make the changes that will make it sound right to you. For what it's worth, of the many (over 100) guitars i have owned only three or four were not modified to give thwm their own sound or to sound like someone else's. In all the jumble don't forget to find your own sound, you know, the one that sounds like you and nobody else.
P.S. I finally got over the names on guitars, there are lots out there that don't have Fender or Gibson on the head that sound and play as good. Personaly I prefer an Ibanez RG170 to a strat but thats just me.
 
Good luck, it's like trying to choose between Ginger or Mary Ann.
 
philboyd studge said:
Good luck, it's like trying to choose between Ginger or Mary Ann.

Ginger for the one night, Mary Anne for life.
 
Maybe I should expand this a little: Stratocasters are immensely popular guitars, currently (this was not always the case), but saying that a Stratocaster is used in a wide variety of music is not the same thing as saying the Stratocaster has a wide variety of sounds.

Of course, you can get nearly anything to sound like anything else with enough effects, processing, amp diddling and soforth, but if you really want to know what a guitar sounds like and what you sound like as a player, you use a plain guitar cable and an amp set clean with plenty of headroom. Scary, huh? :)

When I talk about a Stratocaster of any vintage, I mean the basic US-made standard model, not an import, a Double-Fat, a Delonge, a Stagemaster, Dipsy-Doodle or any other variant, just the plain-vanilla item. Currently, that's the "American" series.

A Stratocaster straight into an amp doesn't really have that much range. What it has is a few unique, powerful, high-frequency sounds that everyone knows. It has no low end.

The Stratocaster is popular for a couple of reasons that I see. One, it has a limited range of distinctive bright tones can cut through any amount of mush onstage and in recordings. If it's there, you can tell. For that, it's hard to touch (a Telecaster's bridge pickup will also cut through, but it's a lot thinner than the Stratocaster's "quack" 2 & 4 settings).

The other reason is that it's about the cheapest widely accepted pro electric guitar there is. You watch the sales and catch an AmSe for $599.99 at Musician's Friend, set it up right and you can go on any stage in the world and nobody's going to look down on your choice of axe.

These two reasons are very persuasive.
 
christiaan said:
I have a Tele. I like having a fixed bridge.
So do I, which is why the Stratocaster I play the most is this one. :) One of the discontinued "White Blonde" ones exactly like in the picture.
 
No strats, no teles!

Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Cyclones and Mustangs!!!

Peace...

PC
 
Back
Top