snare mic picking up mostly hi-hats??

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keith_H
  • Start date Start date
K

Keith_H

New member
I have a sm57 on my snare drum mounted with an LP claw about midway between my hi-hats and my first tom and it's picking up more hi-hat sound than it is snare. What is a good way to reduce this?? I don't have much equipment but I do have that mic running into a 6 channel peavey mixer then out to a tascam mkii- so you get the idea - mostly cheap stuff. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

If it would help to hear it, check out
www.mp3.com/marla-singer
and pick either song, it's pretty bad in both of them but I think it's the worst in "posthumously disenchanted"

Thanks!!
Keith
 
First of all the SM57 must be most common mic to use on the snare, so no complaints there!!
I guess you´ve tried to point it away from the hi-hat? Doesnt help cause the sound is reflecting against the snare head...
Use two mics, one under and one at the top. Maybe you can reduce some of the high-freqs on the top and compensate with the one under!!
But on the other hand the one under will probably pick up some of the kicks sound as well. It´s really a question of how much you have to tweak the sound with your eq and the way the drums being played!! I dont mean one have to pound the snare to pieces just so the hi-hat leak will decrease.

I use two overhead mics to get the over all sound and the close mics just to get some more attack on each drum when needed.
It gets me an natural sounding , not over-tweaked and good balanced kit.
As always the drum has sound like a million dollars from the beginnig.It rarely gets any better in the mix with eq´s afterwards...

Or you can always buy yourself a drum machine!!

//Flounder :D
 
Location, location, location

You are in luck! A SM57 is one of the better mics to use for the purpose you are using it for. But like in business, there are three things to consider: Location, location, location. Or for our purposes, the way you position your mic has a lot to do with it. Since an SM57 has a cardoid pattern, it has some decent off axis rejection. Try to move your hi-hats a little farther away from the snare and increase its' height a little bit. Next Lower your snare a little (every little bit helps). Then position your microphone between your snare, hi-hat and tom, but this time, the capsule is a little forward, facing you and the snare head, with the hi-hats behind its' capsule (hoping off-axis rejection to ward off some hi-hat db's) and ensuring the height of your mic stand is adjusted so that the mic is closest to the snare than the other three. Adjust the mic head so it is pointing at an angle at the snare head, but not too much so it won't pickup reflected hi-hat sounds. You said you have limited equipment, with this arrangement, you get away with lowering the sound from your hi-hats and increading the sound of your snare. using only one mic. Be warned, at this close micing scheme, you are bound to pick up snare rattles...
 
OK, Flounder gives in for Dr. tony A. Very well explained operation.
It´s just that you now have to deal with a whining drummer.
I have never come across moreperfectionistic people...
-Lowering my snare ?!! -Get out of here you `###`....

I think i´ll try it myself though. //
 
Ok, I think I'm going to have to raise the hi-hat and lower than snare some- as much as I don't want to!! I really would like to place one 57 on the bottom of the snare as well, but like I said- i have very limited resources. It might be hard for me to move the hi-hats much- because...i have my set crammed in a corner of my room, but i think I can adjust it a little..Thanks, I 'll try it tongiht!!

Keith
 
TRY PLAYING WITH EQ

Another thing, I don't like to do this because I like everything natural and transparent, but you could play with your EQ and see what you get. Lower your highs...
 
Re: Location, location, location

tonyA said:
Try to move your hi-hats a little farther away from the snare and increase its' height a little bit. Next Lower your snare a little (every little bit helps.

Hi Tony,

Wrong Answer. It's like telling a guitar player he needs to raise or lower his strings, when that's not the problem.

There's a reason his drummer has his kit set up that way-because it's what is comfortable for him.

I personally have 1 SM57, and I use it to pound nails into drum risers (Literally) in front of creeping kick drums. I can't stand them, myself...After running live sound for years, I just do not like 57's. The reason so many have them is because it's under $80, not because it's the best mic for the job.

I would suggest you try a Beyer M422 for the snare. I have converted several people over from SM57's, and I have even inspired several drummers that I've recorded to actually purchase them for themselves based upon Demo's I've done for them.

The M422 goes for about $130 Bucks, it's about 3/4" in diameter, and about 2" long and a Hypercardioid pickup pattern.. Best snare Mic I've ever used.
Put it on a claw, and it will basically go anywhere on the kit, even in really tight setups.

Also, another killer SMALL mic for snare is the Shure Beta 98. It's a Condenser and goes for about $230 with the drum mount.

Tim
 
It might be the walls reflecting the Hats back at the mic, try moving the kit out of the corner, or if you can't, rotate the kit 180 degrees (or 90 or whatever you can) and see if you still have the same problem.
 
Hi Tim,

My intention in moving the hi-hats and the drum is to ensure that the mic is closest to the snare and away from the hi-hats. I couldn't see why having a mic closer to the sound source to get increased input would be a wrong answer. Cardoids response are very much affected by the distance of the sound source. This is where it is being exploited for the problem Keith is having.

I am a drummer too, though I play keyboards and lead. I know what you are talking about being comfortable with the drum set up. But if you could recall, I said, "a little bit". Any drummer who couldn't accomodate a "little" bit change in the set up must be a begginner. One must understand that no matter how expensive your drum set is, and how much preparation you do in setting your set up, it will move and distances will change as you play them. And if as a drummer, this will factor will ruin your gig, I suggest pick a different instrument to play or your band will be better off getting a different drummer!

There a lot other mics better than an SM57, I grant you that, but remember what Keith said, "I have limited equipment". We have to work within that parameter which he had defined. The word "best" is of course relative. I am sure you have good reasons to prefer other mics than the SM57 as do others have good reasons to prefer the SM57. Cost or otherwise, SM57 is a standard in home and professional recording studios. Yours may be diferent. But I do not believe that cost is the only factor why people choose SM57, otherwise, there is a boatload of Radio Shack mics and similar equipment that never make it to any studio, and if they do, heaven forbid!
 
Put that sm57 1" from the head of the snare. Don't use eq going to tape and at mix down if you really want that high freq. turn the treble knob to 2 o'clock at most. I heard you're mp3 it sounds like you're putting eq to tape, DO NOT! I had the same recorder and mic when I first started, that was what I did and my recordings sounded like hiss too.
The hi hats should not be louder than that snare with the mic so close. You'll obviously have to lower your trim but thats good.
rock on
Adam
 
Adam,

When you say do not use eq going to tape, i take it as - leave the eq knobs at 12 o'clock for the highs and the lows on mixer, is that correct? Then at mixdown, I can turn the high eq knob on the 4-track to around 2 o'clock to boost the highs?

That brings me to another question- should i leave the all eq's on all three of my mics set at 12 o'clock on my mixer during recording? Because- after I record I can't adjust them seperately (obviously) since they are mixed to 1 track on the 4 track.

Thanks..
Keith
 
I got this little trick out of the March issue of the Home Recording Magazine (The Top 100 Recording Tips & Tricks) and I think it may be right up your alley;

"Get a cardboard paper cup and pop out the bottom. Next, mount your snare mic on the mic stand and put the mic through the cup, allowing the cup to cover the entire shaft of the mic. Next, tape the cup on to your mic and then stuff the inside with Kleenex (this will prevent a comb filter effect on the snare). After you've done this position the mic perpendicular to and about an inch or two above the snare."

I haven't tried this little trick yet but it sounds like it would do the job, so give it a try and let us know how it works out. :)

-tkr
 
Keith_H said:
Adam,

When you say do not use eq going to tape, i take it as - leave the eq knobs at 12 o'clock for the highs and the lows on mixer, is that correct? Then at mixdown, I can turn the high eq knob on the 4-track to around 2 o'clock to boost the highs?

That brings me to another question- should i leave the all eq's on all three of my mics set at 12 o'clock on my mixer during recording? Because- after I record I can't adjust them seperately (obviously) since they are mixed to 1 track on the 4 track.

Thanks..
Keith

Leave them all @ 12 o'clock. Eq is there to take out frequncies that sound like crap or are making same frequencies on other instruments not audiable. Here is where mid sweeps come in handy on that tascam. Turn both midrange knobs all the way to the right ( only at mix down, leave every eq knob alone while you're recording), now the bottom midrange knob controls what frequency you're gonna boost or cut, turn it to the left til you find where it sounds the poorest, now use your top midrange knob(this knob should still be turned all the way to the right), and cut that frequency by turning it left past 12 o'clock. If you don't go past 12 o'clock you'll boost that signle you didn't like.
 
What do you mean by mid-sweeps? The only knobs I have on the tascam are eq high and eq low, is thayt wat you are talking about?
 
I think all the advice about placement is dead on. Certainly, a cardiod mic is going to reject really well from directly behind the mic. Actually, if you check to cardiod pattern, excellent rejection can happen with anything 90 degrees from the top of the capsule. Try playing with that and you should get better results.

Bottom micing is totally overrated. I will not say don't try it if you have to mics, preamps, and tracks to do so, but don't sweat it. I find myself usually turning that track off at mix time anyway.

Tim, I am sure that the Beyer is an excellent sounding mic. But, I have done too many great sounding snare tracks with a 57 to discount it on snare. Having never heard any of your work, I cannot comment of course on it. But really, a lot of great drum tracks have been recorded with SM-57's. If your 57's are not too banged up from you *gasp!* "driving nails with them", please feel free to send them to me in exchange for a nice hammer I have....;)

Now, let's address this issue of drummers not adjusting to the situation.

I am about to shoot the lot of you drummers who feel that you have to have every single drum within 1mm of each other, and every damn cymbal 2" above the toms!!!

I cannot count how many drummers I have mixed live and recorded who do this and WILL NOT adjust. Without fail, the drum sounds are compromised because of this (I have found that most drummers that do this don't tune their set's so well either, but that isn't the discussion here....). I think tonyA said it best when he suggested that a drummer who's playing is going to be effected by moving some stuff around to foster more room for mic placement is probably a beginner. I will add that if you are NOT a beginner and are like this, you haven't accepted the reality of modern drum mic techniques, or maybe don't hear so well, or something. This is some of the most complained about stuff from sound engineers world wide for me to accept that it is our lack of competency.

Without fail, the best drum tracks I have recorded, or mixed live is where the drummer played cymbals at least 1' above any drum. I have seen them as high as 2'. I can settle for cymbals 1' away from any drum. The isolation this provides is excellent when micing.

I have drummed before in bands. I found that once my chops were up that having cymbals away from drums was abosolutely no problem to do, and engineers appreciate this. The reason is that I have found the most natural drum sounds to come from having the mics around 3-5" off of the head. If you have cymbals right there, of course you will have unappropriate bleed. The reality is that if you are playing live, the soundman 95% of the time is going to be using SM-57's, not some tiny capsule specialized drum mic. This is the REALITY that drummers MUST deal with if they want good drum sounds. The soundman is not going to be able to pull out some other mic out of his ass on the spot. I can assure you too that most competent soundmen are not going to want to deal with an unfamiliar mic. Unless you have the benefit of a nice long soundcheck, the soundman needs to go with what he knows, and some new mic does not fit the equasion. Drummers, this is the REALITY here, not shit I am making up. Accept it and start practicing with a setup that is more cooperative to micing and in no time you will never know the difference in your playing.

Okay, that part of the rant is over.

Next!

Drummers!!!!!!!! Do you HAVE to beat the shit out of your cymbals? Really, do you?

Set dynamics are very important. In most recording situations, 2 overhead mics and a kick drum mic can sound awesome and provide the most natural drum sound. The problem starts with drummers who beat the hell out of their cymbals compared to how hard they play their snare and toms. Especially with the TOMS!!! Too many times, I have a great sound on the snare and toms with overheads but end up cutting out all the low end on those mics at mix because the drummer just plain flat out plays their cymbals too loud. So loud that they are out of balance with the rest of the kit! Again, sound is compromised because the drummer will not compromise or has no real understanding of what what it takes to get good sound drums on tape.

So, off I go to close up micing being the prominent sound. Then I get to listen to the drummer bitch about how his drums don't sound all that natural. Blah blah blah, etc etc etc......Then I deal with the cymbals being too close to the close up mics....blah blah blah, etc etc etc...... Now I have to use noise gates, or spend a shit load of time in a digital editor (if budget allows) to deal with this, and the sound becomes MORE unnatural. Like it is MY fault that the drummer is basically messed up and cannot work with the reality of micing drums. Compromised sound, and usually with the types of musicians who cannot afford the band aid fixes.

Bullshit!!!

It is like the guitar player who has all low end and high end in his guitar sound with no mids at all, and with too much distortion. I am supposed to deal with THAT?!?!?!?!?!?!? just because the guy does not have enough control on his chops to play with a tone that actually works within a band context?

It is like the bass player who beats the hell out of his bass strings and then complains that he cannot get a clear sound. He increases his low end to try to compensate, and in the back of the room it is nothing BUT low end. (hey bass players, tell me I am wrong, but you could more easily count the times a soundman DIDN'T ask you to turn down right? I will be money on it.....)

It is like the singer who wispers 4" off of a mic, then shouts right on it, then complains that he cannot hear the wisper and that the monitors are distorting when he shouts. (oh, thanks for blowing my monitors dude!)

It is about compromise, and for too long, it is the soundman compromising all the way with people who lack the experience and/or talent to do it the way it works well.

I NEVER question the soundman (unless I have heard really shitty mixes from them on bands I have mixed that I know sound very good) when they ask me to do certain things with my sound when I play live. In the studio, on the rare cases I let others record me, I certainly take into account the engineers ideas about my sound. If I am unfamiliar with their room or monitors, I have little choice in the matter really. The reality is that I hired them in the studio because they know their business. Live, if I have heard great mixes from them, I do not question what they need from my sound one bit. If it effects my playing too much having to move a cymbal, or change the eq on my guitar, I may bring this up and ask them what they think, but I do so in a manner that makes them feel that what they need is JUST as important and what I need. In the end though, I tell them that I will do whatever they need to make it sound good and sacrifice what I want to achieve that. I have had live board mixes on nights when I couldn't hear myself at all and found that I played just fine. This is because I PRACTICE enough to be confident that I can play with only a tempo reference. I have played drums just fine not hearing the rest of the band because of bad monitors.

Do I like not hearing myself the way I want to? No. Do I like having to accomodate the soundman in my setup? No. Do I want to sound the best that is possible and am willing to do what it takes to achieve that? YES!!! THAT is what being professional is about.

I could go on and on about this. All's that I can really say is that the more professional the musician is, the more willing I find them to compromise on sound issues. It is usually the inexperienced and/or sloppy musicians, and one's with ego's bigger than the number of people paying to see them that are the problems. Any other pro's find this to be the case? Feel free to speak your peace for the benefit of others. One thing I hate about this business is how most people in production feel that they have to accomodate the musicians ego at the sacrifice of doing what would be best for the sound. Ever asked the soundman how you sounded and they say "Great", then when you ask your musician friend for an honest to god truthful answer, they list off a bunch of things? Don't ask your girlfriend and expect a real answer, she was just checking out your dick all night and making sure that other girls knew she was with you. As long as she could hear YOU she was happy, and she probably moved all over the room until she could.....:)

Keith_H, take a bit of advice from a guy who played his first gig in 1982 and played hundreds of shows on three different instruments AND sang too, and has mixed countless bands live (many signed artists and a handful of grammy award winning artists), recorded over 100 bands, and is still doing it, LEARN TO COMPROMISE! You are going to find that doing certain things in certain ways is going to work out a majority of the time. If your drum sounds are compromised because you cannot set up a little bit differently, THAT is the reality. You either compromise a bit on your set up and/or the way you play, or the sound is compromised. Until the day that you can AFFORD to have whatever the hell you want in a setup, playing dynamics, etc.....you will find much better receptivity from people you have to WORK WITH if you are versatile.

Good luck.

Ed
 
Last edited:
AMEN!
THANK YOU!
I had a band come into my home studio to record and they did all the same things you're talking about. The bass player had to hear those intriket little parts he made up while in the mean time his bands rhythm section fell apart. And mix down is terrible with these guys, people think that because they can set eq on their guitar amp and home stereo they know evrything about eq.
And one other point for bands who are recording, if you want your kick drum loud and your bass guitar loud, learn to hit those bass notes when that kick drum hits, this technique might cause your drummer to quit hitting the kick drum anytime he feels like it and your band might actually sound a little more tight.
 
HELL YEA!!
I love the fourth of July!!
Well I finally did some recording today and the best recording of my drums ever. I rearranged my set some a few days back and finally got some time to record today. I raised my hi- hats about 2 inches and dropped my snare about an inch. I messed around with the recording for like 2 hours but finally got it sounding good!!!


Thanks!!
Keith
 
ED...

For many of those reasons you mention are the ones that keep from wanting to do live sound ever again. One more to add to your list: I hate when bands feel they have to play louder than the PA system. How are you supposed to mix?... Better yet, what are you supposed to mix? By the time you push the PA into the "RED" to get over the stage noise, everything is so loud that nobody listening can truely enjoy the music.

I do think musicians need to respect the engineer's experience when it comes to sound. In the studio environment, If you don't trust or like the way he works, then you should not hire him. I have to agree 100% with the following statement made by Ed:

"If I am unfamiliar with their room or monitors, I have little choice in the matter really. The reality is that I hired them in the studio because they know their business." - Ed

I hate when people come into my studio and fuss that their mix does not sound like their home stereo. Another dislike is when they insist on a mix that is dynamically a mess, resulting in a low level master. I always warn them of their descisions when they demand such things. It is their money, I guess they will learn the next time they go into a studio and listen to the engineer.
 
Back
Top