
Kingofpain678
Returned from the dead
i own a shure pg-57 and i get some crappy results from it. im actually getting better results with a mic i got for free with a stand i bought. would a shure sm-57 be a good step up from the pg57?
i own a shure pg-57 and i get some crappy results from it. im actually getting better results with a mic i got for free with a stand i bought. would a shure sm-57 be a good step up from the pg57?
If you want a dynamic mic, check into AKG or BeyerDynamic. Also look into condensers, ribbons, etc., depending on what you're trying to record.
Alot of the records you hear on the radio have guitar tracks miced with the SM57....maybe more than all the other mics combined...you dont need to be fancy to amplify a guitar amp.
True. For guitar amp purposes, it's a commonly used tool. Of course, the original poster also wanted something for acoustic, where IMHO it would sound pretty terrible.And voice.
I think PG stands for Pretty Good. Nothing great, nice cheap live use stage mics imo. SM's are way better than PG's...
isnt an sm57 a live mic too?
well then im not really seeing what the big difference between the pg and sm series is![]()
the PG's are a budget version of a budget mic.