M
mixaholic
New member
i use adobe audition to record vocals with. should i put the setting on audio to mono or stereo when recording vocals? thanks
not to me. if its one recording done to 2 mono tracks, its still the same as one stero track split in half. the reason i do it that way is because i usually like to add different delay and reverb times to each vocal track and pan them wide. i think it gives a nice effect. it sounds like one vocal track right in the middle until you hear a slight touch of varying delay times in each ear.mixaholic said:thanks. does that make the vocal sound wider?
How would you sing it twice at the same time into two mics to get a stereo track?Elton Bear said:Unless you double-track them... but even then I'd use two mono channels, not one stereo...
how is it a waste of hard-drive space if you want 2 vocal tracks to pan and add effects to?Farview said:How would you sing it twice at the same time into two mics to get a stereo track?
One voice into one mic is mono, it doesn't matter how many tracks you send it to, it's mono. Don't waste hard drive space.
oh okay. i agree with that.Farview said:It is a waste of harddrive space to record a mono signal on a stereo track.
Notice he's asking how to set his software, not how to record vocals.mixaholic said:i use adobe audition to record vocals with. should i put the setting on audio to mono or stereo when recording vocals? thanks
But processing power isn't. Once you get 6 or 7 vocal tracks, all with compression, EQ, etc..., if you record them in stereo, you have just doubled the CPU load. Not to mention the fact that the singers movments would become very distracting in a mix. I'm trying to think of a style of music that would lend itself to having a single vocalist mic'd up in stereo and I'm coming up blank. Help me out.NYMorningstar said:The space utilization shouldn't be a consideration any longer because memory is cheap, real cheap.
polka rap.Farview said:But processing power isn't. Once you get 6 or 7 vocal tracks, all with compression, EQ, etc..., if you record them in stereo, you have just doubled the CPU load. Not to mention the fact that the singers movments would become very distracting in a mix. I'm trying to think of a style of music that would lend itself to having a single vocalist mic'd up in stereo and I'm coming up blank. Help me out.
Tracking in stereo is not going to double your cpu load although it will increase it. Processing power shouldn't be the deciding factor anyhow because you can always freeze tracks once you've apply all the compression and eq you need.Farview said:But processing power isn't. Once you get 6 or 7 vocal tracks, all with compression, EQ, etc..., if you record them in stereo, you have just doubled the CPU load. Not to mention the fact that the singers movments would become very distracting in a mix. I'm trying to think of a style of music that would lend itself to having a single vocalist mic'd up in stereo and I'm coming up blank. Help me out.