But you can route the SBLive! output to 2496 audio in, and monitor thru the 2496...
You know, I see this suggestion a bunch, and I scratch ny head and wonder...
Why?
If you route the SB Live's own Line Out to a mixer, and the Audiophile or whatever other sound card too, that's all you need to do.
If you route the SB Live's Line Out to the L and R ins of the Audiophile, you tie up both your inputs, and you go through an extra conversion step:
SB Live's internal synth --> {D/A conversion} --> SB Line Out --> Audiophile Line In --> {A/D conversion} --> Audiophile WAV stream
I think a lot of people mus be assuming that since the Audipohile is a superior soundcard, routing to it and monitoring from it must improve over the SB Live's output.
But the SB Live's output is what it is, and all this processs does is re-digitize it, and even if it were a perfect rendering of the original signal, it would never be better.
So, what's the point? The only reason I can see is if you only have powered speakers and no mixer, and hence can only monitor off of one sound card. But that still leaves you with the problem of tying up the imputs on the primary soundcard, meaning you'll have to disconnect and reconnect them over and over to do any recording.