I spent a little time with a Peavey Ecoustic today. (That name - "Ecoustic" - why don't they take themselves a little more seriously). 100 watt, 2 channel, one with XLR and high - impedence inputs, 12 " speaker. Each channel has a small graphic EQ and basic reverb controls. The amp is voiced for an acoustic guitar and marketed to an acoustic oriented musician.
I played a Taylor 12- String jumbo, maple sides / back (pant, pant) with a Fishman Matrix (I think) dual source signal. I then played the other end of the spectrum, a Tacoma carved archtop jazzbox, sitka top and wild flame maple back & sides, all solid woods, with an EMG floating magnetic pickup. This is a neat and clean acoustic jazz guitar that has tone and volume controls peeking out from underneath the pickguard.
The Taylor sounded magnificent though this amp. Very bright (although perhaps inherent in a 12 - string) and balanced. Now, perhaps that guitar would sound good through a transistor radio, but I had been skeptical and was pleasantly surprised by the sound.
When I tried the Tacoma, I found it to be very bottom end heavy, with weak highs - not what
a jazzbox should be. I fooled around a while, and finally cranked that sucker up to a rude level. What a change. This amp really came to life and I had a real jazz sound, with punchy highs and quick delays. Both guitars responded to a "presence" tone control.
So I dunno, nobody is doing any modeling here, but for under five bills, this packed a pretty serious punch with two radically different signals. Enough so that I might go back and experiment some more.
Maybe the way to look at this stuff is to listen to the sound without preconceptions of what it "ought to be" or "tries to emulate." Sounds pretty good, all in all.
Now, if I can find an extra
SWR California Blonde kicking around, I will probably get converted.