Marduk...the "recorded" sound I refer to is: the difference in the way a guitar sounds live as opposed to transferring a signal to audio tape or digital. I think anyone who has had experience recording guitar sounds can attest to the fact that the "recorded" sound of a guitar can be way different than the live sound you expected to hear on playback. Hence, good recording engineers know how to adjust to that fact. I've used rack units that sound awesome live, but that same "recorded" patch sounds way different on playback. It takes time to learn how to record a guitar....especially acoustics. You can use all the electronics and or plug ins you want man...There is no substitute for micing a guitar amp.
Now I'll respond to Chattbox:..Didn't mean to get you in a huffy man. If you have read any of my previous posts, you would have "understood" my reply as constructive...NOT destructive. I'm hardcore man, I don't pull any punches. If I have nothing nice to say, I won't respond. But, people here are looking for honest, and candid responses..If you can't take criticism, you shouldn't be posting for replies.
"I found the sound to be rather offensive to my ear". Rude or not, that was my impression. I hated the sound. That "recorded" guitar sounds like shit to me man,(NOT the playing) piezo under the bridge or not...I don't care. The higher register of the gtr was thin and ugly, more percussive than warm. The balance between high and low notes was aurally disturbing to my ear. AND...this is just my own HUMBLE opinion...it means nothing...I'm just 1 response man!
You state "that is the sound I try to achieve with a multiple mic technique,". Well, good for you man...go for it. I humbly disagree is all. As far as "showing off". I have no response to that 1 man.The answer to your question,"Was this an honest reply?"...yes...brutally honest. As is every reply I post.
peace