trogdor
New member
I've used it a little bit... Not sure of the differences between it and 1.0 other than the fact that it looks a lot cooler...
The differences between Nuendo 2.0 and SX are subtle, yet very nice. You get separate mixer channels for your inputs (allowing inserts, eq, etc. before tape). The monitoring is quality.
VST instrument use is also greatly aided in a few aspects. Namely, that it automatically creates a track folder with MIDI, VST automation, and audio tracks inside when you activate a VSTi.
The differences between Nuendo 2.0 and SX are subtle, yet very nice. You get separate mixer channels for your inputs (allowing inserts, eq, etc. before tape). The monitoring is quality.
VST instrument use is also greatly aided in a few aspects. Namely, that it automatically creates a track folder with MIDI, VST automation, and audio tracks inside when you activate a VSTi.
R
RD423
New member
I use it with the 428 the only differences is the look of it, it also has a little more effects and I ca create shortcut keys with the 428 and you couldn't do that with nuendo 1 it's only 1 downside to it and that is the color of the faders on nuendo 1 the higher it gets it changes from green to yellow to red but on 2 it's a constant orangish color and then it will go to red when it peaks that's the only downside but it's nothing major I am happy with it
X
xstatic
New member
There are actually many many differences between Nuendo 1.61 and Nuendo 2.2 if I remember right. First, the routing is way more complicated, but incredibly powerful. Also, it allows you to monitor or record the same input to different tracks at the same time which is handy if you want to inout monitor just certain effects on an input and not the whole inout signal (latency issues etc....) The routing is more complicated at first, but once you get used to it its FAR more powerful and flexible. Also, I believe with Nuendo 2 there was an udpated ASIO core, a reworked audio engine, the FX channel options as mentioned above, a phase reverse button added to each channel strip (FINALLY!, now if next time they add a 360 degree variable phase shift I will be really stoked), a more complete input mixer, more surround options, better mixer screen options and more mixer screens (larger meters, more variable etc...), a pre and post insert section on the master and groups, and probably more codecs and video options that I am not aware of because I don't use them. Also, for me its more stable.