Newbie needs advice: interface for mobile recording

  • Thread starter Thread starter FiveMiles
  • Start date Start date
F

FiveMiles

New member
Hi folks,

I've been doing research for the past couple of weeks on firewire interfaces for a mobile studio. The goal is to be able to make high quality demos and spend as little money as possible. I'm working within the following constraints:

1. My band plays into a single condenser mic. We are attempting to duplicate the sound of string bands from the 20's and 30's. We are a three piece band with fiddle, banjo, guitar and three part harmony.

2. I need the interface to be both MAC and PC compatible. I have a G4 iBook for mobile recording, and I'll use a homebuilt PC for home recording.

3. I want the best possible sound from the preamps. I really would like this aspect of the interface to be very high quality.

4. I need the interface to be rugged, portable, reliable and easy to use.

The units I've got my eye on are:

Edirol FA-66: http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/FA66/

The Edirol looks good because it has zero-latency monitoring, is small, cross-platform compatible and with the special I can get Sonar LE. I don't have any recording software other than Audacity.

MOTU UltraLite: http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/UltraLite/

I've heard great things about the quality of MOTU products. I like the ability to monitor levels right on the interface display. I am concerned about PC compatibility as I know MOTU is a MAC focused company.

So, are there any other firewire interfaces that I should be considering? At the 350-550 dollar range, am I going to get a unit with a high quality sound? Is zero latency monitoring a big deal if I'm only really using one to two mic inputs with no overdubs? Would either of these units be good to expand on when I eventually put together a real home recording studio?

Also, is there a setup that would allow me to use just an interface and a portable firewire harddrive to record the raw sound? Then I could download it to my PC at home (which has a ridiculous ammount of processing power and tones of RAM) and do the final mixing there.

Finally, I'm lacking software as I mentioned above. I use Audacity and a simply Sony stereo mic for my current recordings (found on www.newhottimes.com). Is Audacity sufficient, or should I really be using a different software package (like the Sonar LE that comes with the FA-66).

Thanks in advance for your knowledge and wisdom! It's a bit of a maze out there for the traditional acoustic musician who wants to capture his music digitally.
 
I use this and for your use you'd be foolish to go any further upscale than this.

I use Audacity too, and it serves my purpose just fine.

There are two important principles at work here: don't spend money just for the sake of spending money, and if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

And welcome to the board! :)
 
ssscientist said:
I use this and for your use you'd be foolish to go any further upscale than this.

ssscientist,

Can you elaborate on that comment? I'm really new to this stuff. Is the Firebox you mentioned low latency? Does low latency even matter in my setup? What about sound quality?

How would you compare the Firebox with the Edirol FA-66? The FA-66 is only 50 bucks more and it has a zero-latency monitoring function.

Thanks for your reply, and the welcome to the boards. This is a great resource!
 
Unless you're planning to monitor through your converter, the latency doesn't really matter.

The firebox and FA-101/66 are both alright units, and bot huse firewire, so you're set for your PC/Mac issue
 
cpl_crud said:
The firebox and FA-101/66 are both alright units, and bot huse firewire, so you're set for your PC/Mac issue

Is one better than the other? My main concern is sound quality. Are there others I should consider?
 
Back
Top